Reproducing human decisions in reservoir management: the case of lake Lugano

Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify a model able to represent the behavior of the historical decision maker (DM) in the management of lake Lugano, during the period 1982–2002. The DM decides every day how much water to release from the lake. We combine hydrological knowledge and machine learning techniques to properly develop the model. As a predictive tool we use lazy learning, namely local linear regression. We setup a daily predictor, which achieves good accuracy, with a mean absolute percentage error around 8.5%. Yet, the behavior of the model is not fully satisfactory during the floods. In fact, from an interview with a domain expert, it appears that the DM can even update the release decision every 6 hours during emergencies. We have therefore developed a refined version of the model, which works with a variable time step: it updates the release decision once a day in normal conditions, and every 6 hours during emergencies. This turns out to be a sensible choice, as the error during emergencies (which represent about 5% of the data set) decreases from 9 to 3 m3/sec.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Work partially supported by the Swiss NSF grants n. 200020-116674/1, n. 200020-121785/1 and 200021-118071/1.

References

  1. Birattari M., Bontempi G., Bersini H. (1999). Lazy learning meets the recursive least squares algorithm In: M. S. Kearns, S. A. Solla, and D. A. Cohn (eds), Neural Information Processing Systems 11, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 375-381.Google Scholar
  2. Bontempi G., Bersini H., Birattari M. (2001). The local paradigm for modeling and control: from neuro-fuzzy to lazy learning. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 121/1: 59-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corani, G. (2005) Air quality prediction in Milan: feed-forward neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning. Ecological Modeling 185: 513-529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Soncini-Sessa R., Castelletti A., Weber E. (2007). Integrated and Participatory Water Resources Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Villacci D., Bontempi G., Vaccaro A., Birattari M. (2005). The role of learning methods in the dynamic assessment of power components loading capability. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 52: 280-290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Corani
    • 1
  • A.E. Rizzoli
    • 1
  • A. Salvetti
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. Zaffalon
    • 1
  1. 1.IDSIA (Istituto Dalle Molle Intelligenza Artificiale)6928 Manno-LuganoSwitzerland
  2. 2.Dipartimento del Territorio Cantone TicinoUfficio dei corsi d’acqua6500 BellinzonaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Elettronica e InformazionePolitecnico di Milano20122 MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations