Impacts of Ground-Level Ozone on Crop Production in a Changing Climate

  • K. Vandermeiren
  • H. Harmens
  • G. Mills
  • L. De Temmerman
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Ozone (O3) is a naturally occurring chemical present in both the stratosphere (the ‘ozone layer’, 10–40 km above the earth) and in the troposphere (0–10 km above the earth). While stratospheric O3 protects the Earth’s surface from solar UV radiation, tropospheric O3 is the third most important greenhouse gas (after CO2 and CH4) (Denman et al. 2007; Solomon et al. 2007). It contributes to greenhouse radiative forcing, causing a change in the balance between incoming solar radiation and outgoing infrared radiation within the atmosphere that controls the Earth’s surface temperature. Besides its role as a direct greenhouse gas, O3 has been identified as one of the major phytotoxic air pollutants. The adverse effects of O3 on plants were first identified in the 1950s (Hill et al. 1961), and it is now recognized as the most important rural air pollutant, affecting human health and materials, as well as vegetation (WGE 2004).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams RM, Horst RL Jr (2003) Future directions in air quality research: economic issues. Environ Int 29:289–302Google Scholar
  2. Allen LH (1990) Plant responses to rising carbon dioxide and potential interactions with air pollutants. J Environ Qual 19:15–34Google Scholar
  3. Ashmore MR (2002) Effects of antioxidants at the whole plant and community level. In: Bell JNB, Treshow M (eds) Air Pollution and Plant Life. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, UK, pp 89–118Google Scholar
  4. Ashmore MR (2005) Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant Cell Environ 28:949–964Google Scholar
  5. Ashmore MR, Bell JNB (1991) The role of ozone in global change. Ann Bot 67:39–48Google Scholar
  6. Ashmore MR, Marshall FM (1999) Ozone impacts on agriculture: an issue of global concern. Adv Bo. Res 29:31–52Google Scholar
  7. Bale JS, Masters GJ., Hodkinson ID, Awmack C, Bezemer TM, Brown VK, Butterfield J, Buse A, Coulson JC, Farrar J, Good JE, Harrington R, Hartley S, Jones TH, Lindroth RL, Press MC, Symrnioudis I, Watt AD, Whittacker JB (2002) Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob Change Biol 8:1–16Google Scholar
  8. Barnes JD, Davison AW (1988) The influence of ozone on the winter hardiness of Norway spruce (Picea Abies (L.) Karst.). New Phytol 108:159–166Google Scholar
  9. Barnes JD, Ollerenshaw JH, Whitfield CP (1995) Effects of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on growth development and physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Glob Change Biol 1:129–142Google Scholar
  10. Barnes JD, Pfirrmann T (1992) The influence of CO2 and O3, singly and in combination, on gas exchange growth and nutrient status of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). New Phytol 121:403–412Google Scholar
  11. Barnes JD, Velissariou D, Davison AW, Holevas CD (1990) Comparative ozone sensitivity of old and modern Greek cultivars of spring wheat. New Phytol 116:707–714Google Scholar
  12. Barnes JD, Wellburn AR (1998) Air pollutant combinations. In: De Kok L, Stulen I (eds) Responses of Plant Metabolism to Air Pollution and Global Change. Backhuys Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 147–164Google Scholar
  13. Bell JNB (1987) Effects of air pollution on plants and their interactions with other environmental factors. In: Perry R, Harrison RM, Bell JNB, Lester JN (eds) Acid Rain: Scientific and Technical Advances. Selper Ltd, UK, pp 535–545Google Scholar
  14. Bender J, Hertstein U, Black CR (1999) Growth and yield responses of spring wheat to increasing carbon dioxide, ozone and physiological stresses: a statistical analysis `ESPACE-wheat’ results. Eur J Agron 10:185–195Google Scholar
  15. Bernacchi CJ, Kimball B, Long S, Ort D (2006) The direct effects of atmospheric change on evapotranspiration from corn and soybean crops. Agronomy Abstracts. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Madison WI. {CD-ROM P22428}. http://arsserv0.tamu.edu/research/publications
  16. Bernacchi CJ, Kimball BA, Quarles DR, Long SP, Ort DR (2007) Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of CO2 are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiol 143:134–144Google Scholar
  17. Black VJ, Black CR, Roberts JA, Stewart CA (2000) Impact of ozone on the reproductive development of plants. New Phytol 147:421–447Google Scholar
  18. Booker FL, Fiscus EL (2005) The role of ozone flux and antioxidants in the suppression of ozone injury by elevated CO2 in soybean. J Exp Bot 56:2139–2151Google Scholar
  19. Bunce JA (2000) Responses of stomatal conductance to light, humidity and temperature in winter wheat and barley grown at three concentrations of carbon dioxide in the field. Global Change Biol 6:371–382Google Scholar
  20. Bunce JA, Ziska LH (2000) Crop ecosystem responses to climatic change: crop/weed interactions. In: Reddy KR, Hodges HF (eds) Climate Change and Global Crop Productivity. CABI Publishing, U.K., pp 333–352Google Scholar
  21. Cardoso-Vilhena J, Balaguer L, Daymond J, Barnes JD (1998) Amelioration of ozone damage by elevated CO2. In: De Kok LJ, Stulen I (eds) Responses of Plant Metabolism to Air Pollution and Global Change. Backhuys Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 281–282Google Scholar
  22. Chakraborty S, Tiedemann AV, Teng PS (2000) Climate change: potential impact on plant diseases. Environ Pollut 108:317–326Google Scholar
  23. Coakley SM, Scherm H, Chakraborty S (1999) Climate change and plant disease management. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 37: 399–426.Google Scholar
  24. Craigon J, Fangmeier A, Jones M, Donnelly A, Bindi M, De Temmerman L, Persson K, Ojanpera K (2002) Growth and marketable-yield responses of potato to increased CO2 and ozone. Eur J Agron 17:273–289Google Scholar
  25. Crutzen PJ, Lawrence MG, Pöschl U (1999) On the background photochemistry of tropospheric ozone. Tellus 51 A-B:123–146Google Scholar
  26. De Temmerman L, Pihl Karlsson G, Donnelly A, Ojanperä K, Jäger H-J, Finnan J, Ball G (2002) Factors influencing visible ozone injury on potato including the interaction with carbon dioxide. Eur J Agron 17:291–302 Google Scholar
  27. Denman KL, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, Ciais P, Cox PM, Dickinson RE, Hauglustaine D, Heinze C, Holland E, Jacob D, Lohmann U, Ramachandran S, da Silva Dias PL, Wofsy SC, Zhang X (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and USA, pp 499–588Google Scholar
  28. Dentener F, Stevenson D, Cofala J, Mechler R, Amann M, Bergamaschi P, Raes F, Derwent R (2005) The impact of air pollutants and methane emission controls on tropospheric ozone and radiative forcing: CTM calculations for the period 1990–2020. Atmos Chem Phys 5:1731–1755Google Scholar
  29. Derwent RG, Kay PJ (1988) Factors influencing the ground level distribution of ozone in Europe. Environ Pollut 55:191–219Google Scholar
  30. Drake BG, Gonzàlez-Meler MA, Long SP (1997) More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annu Rev Plant Phys 48:609–639Google Scholar
  31. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol 14:135–139Google Scholar
  32. Easterling WE, Aggarwal PK, Batima P, Brander KM, Erda L, Howden SM, Kirilenko A, Morton J, Soussana J-F, Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Food, fibre and forest products. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 273–313Google Scholar
  33. Emberson LD, Ashmore MR, Cambridge HM, Simpson D, Tuovinen J-P (2000) Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe. Environ Pollut 109:403–413Google Scholar
  34. Emberson LD, Ashmore MR, Murray F (2003) Air Pollution Impacts on Crops and Forests – A Global Assessment. Imperial College Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. EPA (1996) Environmental effects of ozone and related photochemical oxidants. In: Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants, vol II, Report EPA/600/P-93/004bF, USA, pp 349Google Scholar
  36. European Commission (2003) Ozone-Climate Interactions. Air Pollution Research Report 81, EUR 20623, European Commission, Luxembourg, pp 143Google Scholar
  37. Fangmeier A, De Temmerman L, Mortensen L, Kemp K, Burke J, Mitchell R, Van Oijen M, Weigel HJ (1999) Effects on nutrients and on grain quality in spring wheat crops grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and stress conditions in the European, multiple-site experiment `Espace-wheat’. Eur J Agron 10:215–229Google Scholar
  38. Fangmeier A, Grüters U, Högy P, Vermehren B, Jäger HJ (1996) Responses of some cereal cultivars to CO2 enrichment and ozone at different levels of nitrogen supply. J Appl Bot 70:12–18Google Scholar
  39. Fiscus EL, Booker FL, Burkey KO (2005) Crop responses to ozone: uptake, modes of action, carbon assimilation and partitioning. Plant Cell Environ 28:997–1011Google Scholar
  40. Fiscus EL, Reid CD, Miller JE, Heagle AS (1997) Elevated CO2 reduces O3 flux and O3-induced yield losses in soybeans: possible implications for elevated CO2 studies. J Exp Bot 48:307–313Google Scholar
  41. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M, Van Dorland R (2007) Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and USA, pp 129–234Google Scholar
  42. Fowler D, Cape JN, Coyle M, Flechard C, Kuylenstierna J, Hicks K, Derwent D, Johnson C, Stevenson D (1999a) The global exposure of forests to air pollutants. Water Air Soil Poll 116:5–32Google Scholar
  43. Fowler D, Cape JN, Coyle M, Smith RI, Hjellbrekke AG, Simpson D, Derwent RG, Johnson CE (1999b) Modelling photochemical oxidant formation, transport, deposition and exposure of terrestrial ecosystems. Environ Pollut 100:43–55Google Scholar
  44. Fuhrer J (2000) Introduction to the special issue on ozone risk analysis for vegetation in Europe. Environ Pollut 109:359–360Google Scholar
  45. Fuhrer J (2003) Agroecosystem responses to combinations of elevated CO2, ozone, and global climate change. Agr Ecosyst Environ 97:1–20Google Scholar
  46. Fuhrer J, Booker F (2003) Ecological issues of ozone: agricultural issues. Environ Int 29:141–154Google Scholar
  47. Fuhrer J, Shariat-Madari H, Perler R, Tschannen W, Grub A (1994) Effects of ozone on managed pasture. II Yield, species composition, canopy structure and forage quality. Environ Pollut 86:307–314Google Scholar
  48. Fuhrer J, Skärby L, Ashmore MR (1997) Critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation in Europe. Environ Pollut 97:91–106Google Scholar
  49. Fumigalli I, Gimeno B, Velissariou D, De Temmerman L, Mills G (2001) Evidence of ozone-induced adverse effects on crops in the Mediterranean region. Atmos Environ 35:2583–2587Google Scholar
  50. Gardner MW, Dorling SR (2000) Meteorologically adjusted trends in the UK daily maximum surface ozone concentrations. Atmos Environ 34:171–176Google Scholar
  51. Gauss M, Myhre G, Isaksen ISA, Grewe V, Pitari G, Wild O, Collins WJ, Dentener FJ, Ellingsen K, Gohar LK, Hauglustaine DA, Iachetti D, Lamarque F, Mancini E, Mickley LJ, Prather MJ, Pyle JA, Sanderson MG, Shine KP, Stevenson DS, Sudo K, Szopa S, Zeng G (2006) Radiative forcing since preindustrial times due to ozone change in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere. Atmos Chem Phys 6:575–599Google Scholar
  52. Gauss M, Myhre G, Pitari G, Prather MJ, Isaksen ISA, berntsen TK, Brasseur GP, Dentener FJ, Derwent RG, Hauglustaine DA, Horowitz LW, Jacob DJ, Johnson M, Law KS, Mickley LJ, Müller J-F, Plantevin P-H, Pyle JA, Rogers HL, Stevenson DS, Sundet JK, van Weele M, Wild O (2003) Radiative forcing in the 21st century due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere. J Geophys Res 108:4292Google Scholar
  53. Gielen B, Vandermeiren K, Horemans N, D’Haese D, Serneels R, Valcke R (2006) Chlorophyll a fluorescence imaging of ozone-stressed Brassica napus L. plants differing in glucosinolate concentrations. Plant Biol 698–705Google Scholar
  54. Grünhage L, Jäger HJ, Haenel HD, Hanewald K, Krupa S (1997) PLATIN (Plant Atmosphere Interaction) II Co-occurrence of high ambient ozone concentrations and factors limiting plant absorbed dose. Environ Pollut 98:51–60Google Scholar
  55. Harmens H, Mills G, Emberson LD, Ashmore MR (2007) Implications of climate change for the stomatal flux of ozone: a case study for winter wheat. Environ Pollut 146:763–770Google Scholar
  56. Harrington R, Woiwod I, Sparks T (1999) Climate change and trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 14:146–150Google Scholar
  57. Harris NRP, Ancellet G, Bishop L, Hofmann DJ, Kerr JB, McPeters RD, Prendez M, Randel WJ, Staehelin J, Subbaraya BH, Volz-Thomas A, Zawodny J, Zerefos CS (1997) Trends in stratospheric and free tropospheric ozone. J Geophys Res 102:1571–1590Google Scholar
  58. Heagle AS (1989) Ozone and crop yield. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27:397–423Google Scholar
  59. Heagle AS, Miller JE, Sherill DE, Rawlings JO (1993) Effects of ozone and carbon dioxide mixtures on two clones of white clover. New Phytol 123:751–762Google Scholar
  60. Heagle AS, Vrandenburg RK, Burns JC, Miller JE (1994) Ozone and carbon-dioxide effects on spider-mites in white clover and peanut. J Environ Qual 23:1168–1176Google Scholar
  61. Heath RL, Taylor GE (1997) Physiological processes and plant responses to ozone exposure. In: Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL (eds) Forest decline and ozone: a comparison of controlled chamber and field experiments. Springer, Berlin, pp 317–368Google Scholar
  62. Heck WW, Dunning JA (1967) The effects of ozone on tobacco and pinto bean as conditioned by several environmental factors. JAPCA 17:112–114Google Scholar
  63. Heggestad HE, Gish TJ, Lee EH, Bennett JH, Douglas LW (1985) Interaction of soil/moisture stress and ambient ozone on growth and yield of soybean. Phytopathology 75:472–477Google Scholar
  64. Heggestad HE, Middleton JT (1959) Ozone in high concentrations as a cause of tobacco leaf injury. Science 129:208–210Google Scholar
  65. Hill AC, Pack MR, Treshow M, Downs RJ, Transtrum LG (1961) Plant injury induced by ozone. Phytopathology 51:356–363Google Scholar
  66. Holland M, Kinghorn S, Emberson L, Cinderby S, Ashmore M, Mills G, Harmens H (2006) Development of a framework for probabilistic assessment of the economic losses caused by ozone damage to crops in Europe. Defra contract EPG 1/3/205. http://icpvegetation.ceh.ac.uk
  67. Hooker WJ, Yang TC, Potter HS (1973) Air pollution injury of potato in Michigan. Am Potato J 50:151–161Google Scholar
  68. Hui DF, Luo YQ, Cheng WX, Coleman JS, Johnson DW, Sims DA (2001) Canopy radiation – and water-use efficiencies as affected by elevated CO2. Global Change Biol 7:75–91Google Scholar
  69. Hummel RL, Brandenburg RL, Heagle AS, Arellano C (1998). Effects of ozone on reproduction of twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tatrachynidae) on white clover. Environ Entomol 27:388–394Google Scholar
  70. IPCC (2007) Summary for Policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and USA, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  71. Izrael YA (ed) (2002) Scientific aspects of environmental problems in Russia. Proc. All-Russia Conference, Nauka, Moscow. Vol. 1: 622 pp. and Vol. 2, pp 650 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  72. Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos T Roy Soc B 273:593–610Google Scholar
  73. Kang SZ, Zhang FC, Hu XT, Zhang JH (2002) Benefits of CO2 enrichment on crop plants are modified by soil water status. Plant Soil 238:69–77Google Scholar
  74. Karnosky DF, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Kubiske ME, Hendrey GR, Weinstein D, Nosal M, Percy KE (2005) Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate. Plant Cell Environ 28:965–981Google Scholar
  75. Kimball BA, Kobayashi K, Bindi M (2002) Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment. Adv Agron 77:293–368Google Scholar
  76. Krupa SV, Tonneijck AEG, Manning WJ (1998) Ozone. In: Flager RB (ed) Recognition of Air Pollution Injury to Vegetation: A Pictorial Atlas), 2nd edition. Air Waste Management Ass, USAGoogle Scholar
  77. Ku S-B, Edwards GE, Tanner CB (1977) Effects of light, carbon dioxide and temperature on photosynthesis, oxygen inhibition of photosynthesis, and transpiration in Solanum tuberosum. Plant Physiol 59:868–872Google Scholar
  78. Lathière J, Hauglustaine DA, De Noblet-Ducoudrè N, Krinner G, Folberth GA (2005) Past and future changes in biogenic volatile organic compound emissions simulated with a global dynamic vegetation model. Geophys Res Lett 32:L20818Google Scholar
  79. Lee EH (2000) Early detection, mechanisms of tolerance and amelioration of ozone stress in crop plants. In: Agrawal SB, Agrawal M (eds) Environmental Pollution and Plant Responses. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 203–222Google Scholar
  80. Lefohn AS, Runeckles VC (1987) Establishing standards to protect vegetation – ozone exposure/dose considerations. Atmos Environ 21:561–568Google Scholar
  81. Lehnherr B, Mächler F, Grandjean A, Fuhrer J (1988) The regulation of photosynthesis in leaves of field-grown spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cv Albis) at different levels of ozone in ambient air. Plant Physiol 88:1115–1119Google Scholar
  82. Leipner J, Oxborough K, Baker NR (2001) Primary sites of ozone induced perturbations of photosynthesis in leaves: identification and characterization in Phaseolus vulgaris using high resolution chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. J Exp Bot 52:1689–1696Google Scholar
  83. Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Leakey ADB, Morgan PB (2005) Global food insecurity. Treatment of major food crops with elevated carbon dioxide or ozone under large-scale fully open-air conditions suggests recent models may have overestimated future yields. Philos T Roy Soc B 360:2011–2020Google Scholar
  84. Long SP, Naidu SL (2002) Effects of oxidants at the biochemical, cell and physiological levels, with particular reference to ozone. In: Bell JNB, Treshow M (eds) Air Pollution and Plant Life, (r)2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, UK, pp 69–88Google Scholar
  85. LRTAP Convention (2007) Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads and levels and air pollution effects, risks and trends. Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. http://www. icpmapping.org
  86. Martin MJ, Farage PK, Humphries SW, Long SP (2000) Can the stomatal changes caused by acute ozone exposure be predicted by changes occurring in the mesophyll? A simplification for models of vegetation response to the global increase in tropospheric elevated ozone episodes. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:211–219Google Scholar
  87. Massman WJ, Musselman RC, Lefohn AS (2000) A conceptual ozone dose-response model to develop a standard to protect vegetation. Atmos Environ 34:745–759Google Scholar
  88. McAinsh MR, Evans NH, Montgomery LT, North KA (2002) Calcium signalling in stomatal response to pollutants. New Phytol 153:441–447Google Scholar
  89. McKee IF, Bullimore JF, Long SP (1997a) Will elevated CO2 concentrations protect the yield of wheat from O3 damage? Plant Cell Environ 20:77–84Google Scholar
  90. McKee IF, Eiblmeier M, Polle A (1997b). Enhanced ozone-tolerance in wheat grown at an elevated CO2 concentration: ozone exclusion and detoxification. New Phytol 137:275–284Google Scholar
  91. McKee IF, Farage PK, Long SP (1995) The interactive effects of elevated CO2 and O3 concentration on photosynthesis of spring wheat. Photosynth Res 45:111–119Google Scholar
  92. Meehl GA, Stocker T, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global Climate Projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, UK and USA, pp 747–845Google Scholar
  93. Mills G, Buse A, Gimeno B, Bermejo V, Holland M, Emberson L, Pleijel H (2007) A synthesis of AOT40-based response functions and critical levels of ozone for agricultural and horticultural crops. Atmos Environ 41:2630–2643Google Scholar
  94. Mills G, Hayes F, Buse A, Reynolds B (2000) Air pollution and vegetation. In Annual Report 1999/2000 of UN/ECE ICP Vegetation. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bangor, UKGoogle Scholar
  95. Mills G, Holland M, Buse A, Cinderby S, Hayes F, Emberson L, Cambridge H, Ashmore M, Terry A (2003) Introducing response modifying factors into a risk assessment for ozone effects on crops in Europe. In: Karlsson PE, Selldén G, Pleijel H (eds) Establishing Ozone Critical Levels II. UNECE Workshop Report. IVL report B 1523. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Sweden. http://www.ivl.se
  96. Morgan PB, Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2003) Elevated O3 impact on soybeans, a meta-analysis of photosynthesis, biomass and yield responses. Plant Cell Environ 26:1317–1328Google Scholar
  97. Morgan PB, Mies TA, Bollero GA, Nelson RL, Long SP (2006) Season-long elevation of ozone concentration to projected 2050 levels under fully open-air conditions substantially decreases the growth and production of soybean. New Phytol 170:333–343Google Scholar
  98. Mortensen LM (1990) Effects of ozone on growth of Triticum aestivum L. at different light air humidity and CO2 levels. Norw J Agric Sci 4:343–348Google Scholar
  99. Mulholland BJ, Craigon J, Black CR, Colls JJ, Atherton J, Landon G (1997) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on the growth and yield of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Exp Bot 48:113–122Google Scholar
  100. Musselman RC, Lefohn AS, Massman WJ, Heath RL (2006) A critical review and analysis of the use of exposure- and flux-based ozone indices for predicting vegetation effects. Atmos Environ 40:1869–1888Google Scholar
  101. Musselman RC, Massman WJ (1999) Ozone flux to vegetation and its relationship to plant response and ambient air quality standards. Atmos Environ 33:65–73Google Scholar
  102. NEGTAP (2001) Transboundary Air Pollution: Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone in the UK. Report of the National Expert Group on Transboundary Air Pollution. Department of Environmental Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK, pp 313Google Scholar
  103. Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Schönbeck F, Weber A (1994) Crop Production and Crop Protection: Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops. Elsevier, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  104. Ollerenshaw JH, Lyons T, Barnes JD (1999) Impacts of ozone on the growth and yield of field-grown winter oilseed rape. Environ Pollut 104:53–59Google Scholar
  105. Olszyk DM, Tingey DT, Watrud L, Seidler R, Andersen C (2000) Interactive effects of O3 and CO2: implications for terrestrial ecosystems. In: Singh S.N. (ed) Trace Gas Emissions and Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 97–136Google Scholar
  106. Owensby CE, Ham JM, Knapp AK, Auen LM (1999) Biomass production and species composition change in a tall grass prairie ecosystem after long-term exposure to elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biol 5:497–506Google Scholar
  107. Pell EJ, Schlagnhaufer CD, Arteca RN (1997) Ozone-induced oxidative stress: Mechanisms of action and reaction. Physiol Planta 100:264–273Google Scholar
  108. Penkett AS (1991) Changing ozone. Evidence for a perturbated atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol 25:630–635Google Scholar
  109. Pleijel H (2005) Advantages and disadvantages of the flux based approach. In: Wieser G, Tausz M (eds) Proceedings Workshop “Critical Levels of Ozone: Further Applying and Developing the Flux-based Concept”. Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape, Austria, pp 55–60Google Scholar
  110. Pleijel H, Danielsson H, Emberson L, Ashmore MR, Mills G (2007) Ozone risk assessment for agricultural crops in Europe: Further development of stomatal flux and flux–response relationships for European wheat and potato. Atmos Environ 41:3022–3040Google Scholar
  111. Pleijel H, Danielsson H, Ojanperä K, Temmerman LD, Högy P, Badiani M, Karlsson PE (2004) Relationships between ozone exposure and yield loss in European wheat and potato – a comparison of concentration- and flux-based exposure indices. Atmos Environ 38:2259–2269Google Scholar
  112. Pleijel H, Danielsson H, Vandermeiren K, Blum C, Colls J, Ojanperä K (2002) Stomatal conductance and ozone exposure in relation to potato tuber yield – results from the European CHIP programme. Eur J Agron 17:303–317Google Scholar
  113. Pleijel H, Gelang J, Sild E, Danielsson H, Younis S, Karlsson PE, Wallin G, Skarby L, Sellden G (2000) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide, ozone and water availability on spring wheat growth and yield. Physiol Planta 108:61–70Google Scholar
  114. Pleijel H, Mortensen L, Fuhrer J, Ojanperä K, Danielsson H (1999) Grain protein accumulation in relation to grain yield of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in open-top chambers with different concentrations of ozone, carbon dioxide and water availability. Agr Ecosyst Env 72:265–270Google Scholar
  115. Plöchl M, Lyons T, Ollerenshaw J, Barnes J (2000) Simulating ozone detoxification in the leaf apoplast through the direct reaction with ascorbate. Planta 210:454–467Google Scholar
  116. Polle A (1998) Photochemical oxidants: uptake and detoxification mechanisms. In : De Kok LJ, Stulen I (eds). Responses of Plant Metabolism to Air Pollution and Global Change. Backhuys Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 95–116Google Scholar
  117. Polle A, Pell EJ (1999) Role of carbon dioxide in modifying the plant response to ozone. In: Luo Y, Mooney HA (eds) Carbon Dioxide and Environmental Stress. Academic Press, USA, pp 193–213Google Scholar
  118. Powell MC, Muntifering RB, Lin JC, Chappelka AH (2003) Yield and nutritive quality of serica leapeseza (Lespedeza cunceata) and little bluestam (Schizachyrium scoparium) exposed to ground-level ozone. Environ Pollut 122:313–322Google Scholar
  119. Prather M, Gauss M, Berntsen T, Isaksen I, Sundet J, Bey I, Brasseur G, Dentener F, Derwent R, Stevenson D, Grenfell L, Hauglustaine D, Horowitz L, Jacob D, Mickley L, Lawrence M, von Kuhlmann R, Muller J-F, Pitari G, Rogers H, Johnson M, Pyle J, Law K, van Weele M, Wild O (2003) Fresh air in the 21st century? Geophys Res Lett 30:1100–1104Google Scholar
  120. Rao MV, Hale BA, Ormrod DP (1995) Amelioration of ozone-induced oxidative damage in wheat plants grown under high carbon dioxide – role of antioxidant enzymes. Plant Physiol 109:421–432Google Scholar
  121. Rao MV, Koch JR, Davis KR (2000) Ozone: a tool for probing programmed cell death in plants. Plant Mol Biol 44:345–358Google Scholar
  122. Reich PB (1987) Quantifying plant response to ozone: a unifying theory. Tree Physiol 3:63–91Google Scholar
  123. Reinert RA, Eason G, Barton J (1997) Growth and fruiting of tomato as influenced by elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. New Phytol 137:411–420Google Scholar
  124. Riedo M, Gyalistras D, Fischlin A, Fuhrer J (1999) Using an ecosystem model linked to GCM-derived local weather scenarios to analyse effects of climate change and elevated CO2 on dry matter production and partitioning, and water use in temperate managed grasslands. Global Change Biol 5:213–223Google Scholar
  125. Robinson JM, Sicher RC (2004) Antioxidant levels decrease in primary leaves of barley during growth at ambient and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Int J Plant Sci 165:965–972Google Scholar
  126. Rudorff BFT, Mulchi CL, Lee EH, Rowland R, Pausch R (1996) Effects of enhanced O\(_{3}\) and CO\(_{2}\) enrichment on plant characteristics in wheat and corn. Environ Pollut 94:53–60Google Scholar
  127. Sandermann H Jr, Ernst D, Heller W, Langebartels C (1998) Ozone: an abiotic elicitor of plant defence reactions. Trends Plant Sci 3:47–50Google Scholar
  128. Saurer M, Fuhrer J, Siegenthaler U (1991) Influence of ozone on the stable carbon isotope composition, \(\updelta^{13}\)C, of leaves and grain of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol 97:313–316Google Scholar
  129. Sharma YK, Davis KR (1994) Ozone-induced expression of stress-related genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 105:1089–1096Google Scholar
  130. Sheu BH, Liu CP (2003) Air pollution impacts on vegetation in Taiwan. In: Emberson LD, Ashmore MR, Murray F (eds) Air Pollution Impacts on Crops and Forests – A Global Assessment. Imperial College Press, UK, pp 145–163Google Scholar
  131. Simpson D, Ashmore MR, Emberson L, Tuovinen J-P (2007) A comparison of two different approaches for mapping potential ozone damage to vegetation. A model study. Environ Pollut 146:715–725Google Scholar
  132. Simpson D, Fagerli H, Jonson JE, Tsyro S, Wind P, Tuovinen J-P (2003) Transboudary Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe, Part I. Unified EMEP Model Description. EMEP Status Report 1/2003. Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, pp 74Google Scholar
  133. Sitch S, Cox PM, Collins WJ, Huntingford C (2007) Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink. Nature 448:791–794Google Scholar
  134. Soja G, Barnes JD, Posch M, Vandermeiren K, Pleijel H, Mills G (2000) Phenological weighting of ozone exposures in the calculation of critical levels for wheat, bean and plantain. Environ. Pollut 109:517–524Google Scholar
  135. Soja G, Eid M, Gangl H, Redl H (1997) Ozone sensitivity of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L): evidence for a memory effect in a perennial crop plant? Phyton 37:265–270Google Scholar
  136. Soja G, Reichenauer TG, Eid M, Soja A-M, Schaber R, Gangl H (2004) Long-term ozone exposure and ozone uptake of grapevines in open-top chambers. Atmos Environ 38:2313–2321Google Scholar
  137. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Alley RB, Berntsen T, Bindoff NL, Chen Z, Chidthaisong A, Gregory JM, Hegerl GC, Heimann M, Hewitson B, Hoskins BJ, Joos F, Jouzel J, Kattsov V, Lohmann U, Matsuno T, Molina M, Nicholls N, Overpeck J, Raga G, Ramaswamy V, Ren J, Rusticucci M, Somerville R, Stocker TF, Whetton P, Wood RA, Wratt D (2007) Technical summary. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, UK and USA, pp 19–92Google Scholar
  138. Stoewsand GS (1995) Bioactive organosulfur phytochemicals in Brassica oleracea vegetables – a review. Food Chem Toxicol 33:537–543Google Scholar
  139. Tausz M, Grulke NE, Wieser G (2007) Defense and avoidance of ozone under global change. Environ Pollut 147:525–531Google Scholar
  140. Torsethaugen G, Pell EJ, Assmann SM (1999) Ozone inhibits guard cell K+ channels implicated in stomatal opening. P Natl Acad Sci USA 96:13577–13582Google Scholar
  141. UNECE (1988) ECE Critical levels Workshop, Bad Harzburg. Final Draft reportGoogle Scholar
  142. United Kingdom Photochemical Oxidants Review Group (1993) Ozone in the United Kingdom 1993. Third Report prepared for the Department of the Environment, UK, pp 170Google Scholar
  143. US EPA (1996) Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Other Photochemical Oxidants, Vol III. Report No. EPA/600/P-93/004bF. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  144. Van Breusegem F, Vranova E, Dat JF, Inze D (2001) The role of active oxygen species in plant signal transduction. Plant Sci 161:405–414Google Scholar
  145. Vandermeiren K, Black C, Pleijel H, De Temmerman L (2005) Impact of rising tropospheric ozone on potato: effects on photosynthesis, growth, productivity and yield quality. Plant Cell Environ 28:982–996Google Scholar
  146. Vandermeiren K. Black C, Lawson T, Casanova MA, Ojanperä K (2002) Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of potatoes grown under elevated CO2 and/or O3-results from the European CHIP-programme. Eur J Agron 17:337–352Google Scholar
  147. Vandermeiren K, De Temmerman L, Hookham N (1995) Ozone sensitivity of Phaseolus vulgaris in relation to cultivar differences, growth stage and growing conditions. Water Air and Soil Poll 85:1455–1460Google Scholar
  148. Vandermeiren K, De Temmerman L, Staquet A, Baeten H (1992). Effects of air filtration on spring wheat grown in open-field chambers at a rural site. 2. Effects on mineral partitioning, sulphur and nitrogen metabolism and on grain quality. Environ Pollut 77:7–14Google Scholar
  149. Velissariou D (1999) Toxic effects and losses of commercial value of lettuce and other vegetable crops due to photochemical air pollution in agricultural areas of Attica, Greece. In: Fuhrer J, Achermann B (eds) Critical Levels for Ozone in Europe – Level II. Swiss Agency for Environment, Forest and Landscape, Bern, pp 253–256Google Scholar
  150. Volin JC, Reich PB, Givinish TJ (1998) Elevated carbon dioxide ameliorates the effects of ozone on photosynthesis and growth: species respond similarly regardless of photosynthetic pathway or plant functional group. New Phytol 138:315–325Google Scholar
  151. Volz A, Kley D (1988) Evaluation of the Montsouris series of ozone measurements made in the nineteenth century. Nature 332:240–242Google Scholar
  152. Von Tiedemann A, Firsching KH (2000) Interactive effects of elevated ozone and carbon dioxide on growth and yield of leaf rust-infected versus non-infected wheat. Environ Pollut 108:357–363Google Scholar
  153. Vorne V, De Temmerman L, Bindi M, Högy P, Jones MB, Lawson T, Persson K (2002) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on potato tuber quality in the European multiple-site experiment ‘CHIP-project’. Eur J Agron 17:369–381Google Scholar
  154. Vos J, Oyarzun PJ (1987) Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of potato leaves – effects of leaf age, irradiance, and leaf water potential. Photosynth Res 11: 253–264Google Scholar
  155. Vozzo SF, Miller JE, Pursley WA, Heagle AS (1995) Atmospheric pollutants and trace gasses – effects of ozone and water-deficit on field-grown soybean. 1. Leaf gas-exchange. J Eviron Qual 24:663–670Google Scholar
  156. Wang XP, Mauzerall DL (2004) Characterizing distributions of surface ozone and its impacts on grain production in China, Japan and South Korea: 1990 and 2020. Atmos Environ 38:4383–4402Google Scholar
  157. Weber P, Rennenberg H (1996) Dependency of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) fluxes to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaves from NO2 concentration, light intensity, temperature and relative humidity determined from controlled dynamic chamber experiments. Atmos Environ 30:3001–3009Google Scholar
  158. WGE (2004) Review and assessment of air pollution effects and their recorded trends. Working Group on Effects, Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. Natural Environment Research Council, UK. ISBN 1 870393 77 5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Vandermeiren
    • 1
  • H. Harmens
  • G. Mills
  • L. De Temmerman
  1. 1.Veterinary and Agrochemical Research CentreTervurenBelgium

Personalised recommendations