HEPAR: An Intelligent System for Hepatitis Prognosis and Liver Transplantation Decision Support

  • Constantinos Koutsojannis
  • Andrew Koupparis
  • Ioannis Hatzilygeroudis
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 166)

Abstract

In this paper, we present the clinical evaluation of HEPAR, an intelligent system for hepatitis prognosis and liver transplantation decision support in an UCI medical database. The prognosis process, linguistic variables and their values were modeled based on expert’s knowledge the statistical analysis of the records of patients from the existed medical database and relevant literature. The system infers from rules the elements relating to prognosis and liver transplantation by combining the risk scores with weights which can vary dynamically through fuzzy calculations. First we introduce the medical problem, the design approach to the development of the fuzzy expert system and the computer environment. Then we present HEPAR architecture, the reasoning techniques in comparison with the probabilistic characteristics of the medical database. Finally we indicate a few details of the implementation. The expert system has been implemented in FuzzyCLIPS. The fuzzy rules are organized in groups to be able to simulate the diagnosis process. Experimental results showed that HEPAR did quite s well as the expert did.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System: Liver and Biliary Tract disease. In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 15th edn (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnston: Special Considerations in Interpreting Liver Function Tests. American Family Physician 59(8) (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shakil,, et al.: Acute Liver Failure: Clinical Features, Outcome Analysis, and Applicability of Prognostic Criteria. Liver Transplantation 6(2), 163–169 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dhiman, et al.: Early Indicators of Prognosis in Fulminant Hepatic Failure: An Assessment of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and King’s College Hospital Criteria, LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 13, pp. 814–821 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soultati, A., et al.: Predicting utility of a model for end stage liver disease in alcoholic liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol 12(25), 4020–4025 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamath, Kim.: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), HEPATOLOGY (March 2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schepke, et al.: Comparison of MELD, Child-Pugh, and Emory Model for the Prediction of Survival in Patients Undergoing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunting. AJG 98(5) (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cholongitas, E., et al.: Review article: scoring systems for assessing prognosis in critically ill adult cirrhotics. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 24, 453–464 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Louvet, et al.: The Lille Model: A New Tool for Therapeutic Strategy in Patients with Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis Treated with Steroids. HEPATOLOGY 45(6) (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Botta, et al.: MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study. Gut. 52, 134–139 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hepatitis UCI database. G. Gong (Carnegie-Mellon University) via Bojan Cestnik, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Yugoslavia (1988) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan, et al, Evaluation of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease for Prediction of Mortality in Decompensated Chronic Hepatitis B. American Journal of Gastroenterology (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katoonizadeh, et al.: MELD score to predict outcome in adult patients with non-acetaminophen-inducedacute liver failure. Liver International (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones,: Fatigue Complicating Chronic Liver Disease. Metabolic Brain Disease 19(3/4) (December 2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forrest, Evans, Stewart, et al.: Analysis of factors predictive of mortality in alcoholic hepatitis and derivation and validation of the Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score. Gut. 54, 1174–1179 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wadhawan, et al.: Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in Cirrhosis: Correlation with the Size of Varices, Bleeding, Ascites, and Child’s Status. Dig. Dis. Sci. 51, 2264–2269 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vizzutti, et al.: Liver Stiffness Measurement Predicts Severe Portal Hypertension in Patients with HCV-Related Cirrhosis. HEPATOLOGY 45(5) (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fawcett, T.: ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Researchers (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lasko, T.A., et al.: The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 38, 404–415 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bonfà, C., Maioli, F., Sarti, G.L., Milandri, P.R.: Dal Monte HERMES: an Expert System for the Prognosis of Hepatic Diseases, Technical Report UBLCS-93-19 (September 1993)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neirotti, R., Oliveri, F., Brunetto, M.R., Bonino, F.: Software and expert system for the management of chronic hepatitis B. J. Clin. Virol 34(suppl. 1), 29–33 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen, J.: Data differentiation and parameter analysis of a chronic hepatitis B database with an artificial neuromolecular system. Biosystems 57(1), 23–36 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Medsker, L.R.: Hybrid Intelligent Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantinos Koutsojannis
    • 1
  • Andrew Koupparis
    • 1
  • Ioannis Hatzilygeroudis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Engineering & Informatics, School of EngineeringUniversity of Patras, RionPatras(Greece)

Personalised recommendations