Visualization of Cooperative Options for Small Maritime Companies

  • Sylvia Encheva
  • Sharil Tumin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5220)

Abstract

This paper discuses graphical representation of joint transport cargo operations of small maritime companies. Hasse diagrams facilitate a summary of various cooperation options and their relationships. Such information is beneficial for both companies and their customers.

Keywords

Meet-distributive lattices cooperation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bordat, J.P.: Calcul pratique du treillis de Galois dune correspondance, Mathmatiques et Sciences Humaines (Math. Sci. Hum.) 96, 31-47 (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, F., Zhang, R.: Economic viability of mega-size containership in different service networks. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) 13(2), 221–225 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dyer, J.H., Kale, P., Singh, H.: How to Make Strategic Alliances Work. Sloan Management Review 42(4), 37–43 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edelman, P.H.: Meet-distributive lattices and the anti-exchange closure. Algebra Universalis 10(1) (1980)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edelman, P.H.: Abstract convexity and meet-distributive lattices. Contemporary Mathematics 57, 127–150 (1986)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ganter, B.: Two Basic Algorithms in Concept Analysis, FB4-Preprint 831, TH Darmstadt (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis - Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 3626, pp. 290–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Rai, A., Borah, S., Ramaprasad, A.: Critical Success Factors for Strategic Alliances in the Information Technology Industry: An Empirical Study. Decision Sciences 27(1) (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosenbloom, R.S., Christensen, C.: Technological discontinuities, organizational capabilities and strategic commitments. Industrial and Corporate Change 3, 655–685 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sim, K.M.: Bilattices and Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence: Concepts and Foundations. Artificial Intelligence Review 15(3), 219–240 (2001)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zirger, B.J., Maidique, M.: A model of new product development: an empirical test. Management Science 36, 867–883 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvia Encheva
    • 1
  • Sharil Tumin
    • 2
  1. 1.Stord/Haugesund University CollegeHaugesundNorway
  2. 2.IT-Dept.University of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations