CallimachusDL: Using Semantics to Enhance Search and Retrieval in a Digital Library

  • Juan Miguel Gómez-Berbís
  • Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
  • Ángel García-Crespo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5288)


Among the challenges of classifying, locating and accessing knowledge in Digital Libraries tackling with the huge amount of resources the Web provides, improving Digital Libraries by means of different strategies, particularly, using semantics remains a promising and interesting approach. In this paper, we present CallimachusDL, a semantics-based Digital Library which provides faceted search, enhanced access possibilities and a proof-of-concept implementation.


Digital Library Semantic Web Ontologies Faceted Search 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kruk, S.R., Decker, S.: JeromeDL - the Semantic Digital Library. In: Proceedings Semantic Technology Conference 2007, San José, California (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fensel, D.: Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer, Berlin (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, H., Choi, C.: XML how it will be applied to digital library systems. The Electronic Library 18(3), 183–189 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xing, W., Dikaiakos, M.D., Yang, H., Sphyris, A.S., Eftichidis, G.: Building a distributed digital library for natural disasters metadata with grid services and RDF. Library Management 26(4/5), 230–245 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han, Y.: ARDF-based digital library system. Library Hi Tech. 24(2), 234–240 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kruk, S.R., Decker, S., Zieborak, L.: JeromeDL - Adding Semantic Web Technologies to Digital Libraries. In: Proceedings of the 16 th International conference on database and expert systems applications, Copenhagen, Denmark (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferrán, N., Mor, E., Minguillón, J.: Towards personalization in digital libraries through ontologies. Library Management 26(4/5), 206–217 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kruk, S.R., Synak, M., Zimmermann, K.: MarcOnt - Integration Ontology for Bibliographic Description Formats. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Madrid (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazurek, C., Werla, M.: Distributed services architecture in dLibra digital library framework. In: 8th International Workshop of the DELOS Network of Excellence on Digital Libraries on Future Digital Library Management Systems (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–44 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Reilly, T.: What is web 2.0? O’Reilly Network Retrieved (July 10, 2008) (2005),
  12. 12.
    Ignacimuthu, S.: Basic bioinformatics. Alpha Science International, Harrow (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borst, W. N.: Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente (1997) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Teevan, J., Alvarado, C., Ackerman, M.S., Karger, D.R.: The perfect search engine is not enough: A study of orienteering behaviour in directed search. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, pp. 415–422 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McEnery, T., Wilson, A.: Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ranganathan, S.R.: Elements of library classification. Asia Publishing House, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fuentes-Lorenzo, D., Gómez-Berbís, J.M., García-Crespo, Á.: CoolWikNews: More than meets the eye in the XXI century journalism. In: Rech, J., Decker, B., Ras, E. (eds.) Emerging technologies for semantic work environments: Techniques, methods, and applications. Idea Group, Germany (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomas, D., Heinemeier-Hansson, D., Breedt, L.: Agile web development with rails: A pragmatic guide. The Pragmatic Bookshelf, Raleigh, NorthCarolina (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oren, E., Delbru, R., Decker, S.: Extending faceted navigation for RDF data. In: Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. LNCS, pp. 559–572. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ankolekar, A., Krötzsch, M., Tran, T., Vrandecic, D.: The two cultures: mashing up web 2.0 and the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 16th international Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 825–834. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Berners-Lee, T.: The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 96–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Al-Khalifa, H.S., Davis, H.C.: Exploring the value of folksonomies for creating semantic metadata. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 3(1), 13–39 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lux, M., Dosinger, G.: From folksonomies to ontologies: employing wisdom of the crowds to serve learning purposes. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 3(4/5), 515–528 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bevan, E.: The House of Ptolemy. Argonaut Inc., Chicago (1968)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Miguel Gómez-Berbís
    • 1
  • Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
    • 1
  • Ángel García-Crespo
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversidad Carlos III de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations