Explore Residue Significance in Peptide Classification

  • Zheng Rong Yang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5271)

Abstract

Although peptide classification has been studied for a few decades, a proper method for studying residue significance has not yet been paid much attention. This paper introduces a novel neural learning algorithm which can be used to reveal residue significance for discriminating between functional and non-functional peptides and for peptide conformation pattern analysis. The algorithm is a revised bio-basis function neural network which was introduced a few years ago.

Keywords

Peptide classification residue significance neural learning bio-basis function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sellers, P.H.: On the theory and computation of evolutionary distances. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 26, 787–793 (1974)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Needleman, S., Wunsch, C.: A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 48, 443–453 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S.: Identification of Common Molecular Subsequences. Journal of Molecular Biology 147, 195–197 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilbur, W.J., Lipman, D.J.: Rapid similarity searches of nucleic acid and protein data banks. PNAS 80, 726–730 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., Lipman, D.J.: Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poorman, R.A., Tomasselli, A.G., Heinrikson, R.L., Kezdy, F.J.: A cumulative specificity model for protease from human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2, inferred from statistical analysis of an extended substrate data base. J. Biol. Chem. 22, 14554–14561 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rabiner, L.R.: A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE 77, 257–286 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakata, K., Maizel, J.V.: Prediction of operator-binding protein by discriminant analysis. Gene. Anal. Tech. 6, 111–119 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, C.P., Rost, B.: State-of-the-art in membrane protein prediction. Applied Bioinformatics 1, 21–35 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Senawongse, P., Dalby, A., Yang, Z.R.: Predicting the phosphorylation sites using hidden Markov models and Machine Learning methods. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science 45, 1147–1152 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hansen, J.E., Lund, O., Engelbrecht, J., Bohr, H., Nielsen, J.O.: Prediction of O-glycosylation of mammalian proteins: specificity patterns of UDP-GalNAc: polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase. Biochem. J. 30, 801–813 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., Worning, P., Lauemoller, S.L., Lamberth, K., Buss, S., et al.: Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations. Protein Science 12, 1007–1017 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gutteridge, A., Bartlett, G.J., Thornton, J.M.: Using a neural network and spatial clustering to predict the location of active sites in enzymes. Journal of Molecular Biology 330, 719–734 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blom, N., Gammeltoft, S., Brunak, S.: Sequence and structure based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J. Mol. Biol. 24, 1351–1362 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ehrlich, L., Reczko, M., Bohr, H., Wade, R.C.: Prediction of protein hydration sites from sequence by modular neural networks. Protein. Eng. 11, 11–19 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zien, A., Ratsch, G., Mika, S., Scholkopf, B., Lengauer, T., Muller, K.R.: Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites. Bioinformatics 16, 799–807 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, J.H., Lee, J., Oh, B., Kimm, K., Koh, I.: Prediction of phosphorylation sites using SVMs. Bioinformatics 20, 3179–3184 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao, Y., Pinilla, C., Valmori, D., Martin, R., Simon, R.: Application of support vector machines for T-cell epitopes prediction. Bioinformatics 19, 1978–1984 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koike, A., Takagi, T.: Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using support vector machines. Protein. Eng. Des. Sel. 17, 165–173 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Qian, N., Sejnowski, T.: Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. In: Proceeding of Int J. Conf. On Neural Networks, pp. 865–884 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thomson, R., Hodgman, T., Yang, Z.R., Doyle, A.: Characterising proteolytic cleavage site activity using bio-basis function neural networks. Bioinformatics 19, 1741–1747 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dayhoff, M.O., Schwartz, R.M., Orcutt, B.C.: A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Matrices for detecting distant relationships. Atlas of protein sequence and structure 5, 345–358 (1978)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cai, Y.D., Yu, H., Chou, K.C.: Artificial neural network method for predicting HIV protease cleavage sites in protein. J. Protein. Chem. 17, 607–615 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Narayanan, A., Wu, X., Yang, Z.R.: Mining viral protease data to extract cleavage knowledge. Bioinformatics 18, S5–S13 (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chou, K.C.: A key driving force in determination of protein structural classes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 264, 216–224 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zheng Rong Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BiosciencesUniversity of ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations