Crosstalk and Signalling Pathway Complexity - A Case Study on Synthetic Models

  • Zheng Rong Yang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5271)

Abstract

Crosstalk between signalling pathways have been intensively studied in wet laboratory experiments. More and more experimental evidences show that crosstalk is a very important component for maintaining biology systems robustness. In wet laboratory experiments, crosstalk are normally predicted by applying specific stimulus, i.e., various extra-cellular cues or individual gene suppressors or protein inhibitors. If significant difference between a control group without a specific stimulus and an experimental group with a specific stimulus is found, crosstalk is predicted. In terms of time complexity and cost, such experiments are commonly limited to small scales by using very few sampling time points. At the same time, few mathematical models have been proposed to analyse or predict crosstalk. This work investigates how crosstalk affects signalling pathway complexity and if such effect is significant for discrimination purpose, hence providing evidence for crosstalk prediction. Two crosstalk activities (positive and negative) based on simple synthetic transcription models are used for study. The study has found that crosstalk can change the steady-state gene expression order, hence making signalling pathway complex. The finding indicates that crosstalk is predictable using computer programs in top-down systems biology research.

Keywords

Crosstalk signalling pathways transcription degradation gene expression order differential equations steady-state analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., Walter, P.: Cell Communications. In: Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Science, New York, pp. 831–890 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weng, G., Bhalla, U.S., Iyengar, R.: Complexity in Biological Signalling Systems. Science 284, 92–96 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrell Jr., J.E.: Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. Trends. Biochem. Sci. 21, 460–466 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor, J.E., McAnish, M.R.: Signalling crosstalk in plants: emerging issues. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 147–149 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kolch, W.: Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions. Biochem. J. 351, 289–305 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cho, K.H., Wolkenhauer, O.: Analysis and modelling of signal transduction pathways in systems biology. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 1503–1509 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Woolf, P.J., Prudhomme, W., Daheron, L., Daley, G.O., Lauffenburger, D.A.: Bayesian analysis of signaling networks governing embryonic stem cell fate decisions. Bioinformatics 21, 741–753 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zheng Rong Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BiosciencesUniversity of ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations