Advertisement

CoChemEx: Supporting Conceptual Chemistry Learning Via Computer-Mediated Collaboration Scripts

  • Dimitra Tsovaltzi
  • Nikol Rummel
  • Niels Pinkwart
  • Andreas Harrer
  • Oliver Scheuer
  • Isabel Braun
  • Bruce M. McLaren
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5192)

Abstract

Chemistry students, like students in other disciplines, often learn to solve problems by applying well-practiced procedures. Such an approach, however, may hinder conceptual understanding. We propose to promote conceptual learning by having pairs of students collaborate on problems in a virtual laboratory (VLab), assisted by a computer-mediated collaboration script that guides the students through the stages of scientific experimentation and adapts to their needs for support. We used the results from a small-scale study comparing how singles and dyads solve chemistry problems with the VLab with and without scripts to develop a scripted collaborative experimentation environment. A subsequent small-scale study compared an adaptive and a non-adaptive version of the system. Qualitative data analyses revealed a tendency for the dyads in the adaptive feedback condition to improve their collaboration and be more motivated than the non-adaptive dyads. In this paper, we present our research framework and report on preliminary results from the two small-scale studies.

Keywords

Adaptive Condition Adaptive Feedback Collaboration Script Chemistry Classroom Argument Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gabel, D.L., Sherwood, R.D., Enochs, L.: Problem-Solving Skills of High School Chemistry Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 21(2), 221–233 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fasching, J.L., Erickson, B.L.: Group Discussions in the Chemistry Classroom and the Problem-Solving Skills of Students. Journal of Chemical Education 62, 842–848 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kozma, R.B.: The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In: Jacobson, M., Kozma, R. (eds.) Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning, pp. 11–46. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sumfleth, E., Rumann, S., Nicolai, N.: Kooperatives Arbeiten im Chemieunterricht [Cooperative Work in the Chemistry Classroom]. Essener Unikate 24, 74–85 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hausmann, R.G., Chi, M.T.H., Roy, M.: Learning from Collaborative Problem Solving: An Analysis of Three Hypothesized Mechanisms. In: Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D., Regier, T. (eds.) 26nd annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 547–552. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saab, N., van Joolingen, W.R., van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M.: Communication Processes in Collaborative Discovery. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75, 603–621 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diziol, D., Rummel, N., Spada, H., McLaren, B.M.: Promoting Learning in Mathematics: Script Support for Collaborative Problem Solving with the Cognitive Tutor Algebra. In: Chinn, C.A., Erkens, G., Puntambekar, S. (eds.) Mice, minds and society, CSCL 2007, vol. 8(I), pp. 39–41 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bell, T., Slotta, J., Schanze, S.: Perspectives on Collaborative Inquiry Learning: An International Network for Research, Curriculum and Technology. Special Issue of the International Journal of Science Education (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quintana, C., Reiser, B.J., Davis, E.A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R.G., et al.: A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(3), 337–386 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kollar, I., Fischer, F., Hesse, F.W.: Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review 18(2), 159–185 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Over-scripting CSCL: The Risks of Blending Collaborative Learning with Instructional Design. In: Kirschner, P.A. (ed.) Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL, pp. 61–91. Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rummel, N., Spada, H., Hauser, S.: Learning to Collaborate in a Computer-Mediated Setting: Observing a Model Beats Learning from Being Scripted. In: Barab, S.A., Hay, K.E., Hickey, D.T. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences, pp. 634–640. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar, R., Rosé, C.P., Wang, Y.C., Joshi, M., Robinson, A.: Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support. In: Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yaron, D., Evans, K., Karabinos, M.: Scenes and Labs Supporting Online Chemistry. In: 83rd Annual AERA National Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harrer, A., Malzahn, N., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, U.: Learning Design Engines as Remote control to learning support environments. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (2005); Tattersall, C., Koper, R. (eds.), Advances in Learning DesignGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harrer, A., Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.M., Scheuer, O.: How Do We Get the Pieces to Talk? A New Software Architecture to Support Interoperability Between Educational Software Tools. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Jong, T., van Joolingen, W.R.: Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. Review of Educational Research 68(2), 179–201 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klahr, D., Dunbar, K.: Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning. Cognitive Science 12, 1–48 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    White, B.Y., Shimoda, T.A., Frederiksen, J.R.: Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 10, 15–182 (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Joolingen, W.R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A.W., Savelsbergh, E., Manlove, S.: Co-lab: Research and Development of an On-Line Learning Environment for Collaborative Scientific Discovery Learning. Computers in Human Behavior 21, 671–688 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Groot, R., Drachman, R., Hever, R., Schwarz, B., Hoppe, U., Harrer, A., De Laat, M., Wegerif, R., McLaren, B.M., Baurens, B.: Computer Supported Moderation of E-Discussions: the ARGUNAUT Approach. In: The Proceedings of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2007), pp. 165–167 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., Mandl, H.: Scripting Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Learning Environments. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M. (eds.) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dillenbourg, P., Tchounikine, P.: Flexibility in macro-scripts for CSCL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23(1), 1–13 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mühlenbrock, M.: Shared Workspaces: Analyzing User Activity and Group Interaction. In: Hoppe, H.U., Ikeda, M., Ogata, H., Hesse, F. (eds.) New Technologiesfor Collaborative Learning. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitra Tsovaltzi
    • 1
  • Nikol Rummel
    • 2
  • Niels Pinkwart
    • 3
  • Andreas Harrer
    • 4
  • Oliver Scheuer
    • 1
  • Isabel Braun
    • 2
  • Bruce M. McLaren
    • 1
  1. 1.Deutsches Forschungszentrum Für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI)Germany
  2. 2.Albert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgGermany
  3. 3.Technische Universität ClausthalGermany
  4. 4.Katholische Universität Eichstätt-IngolstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations