EC-TEL 2008: Times of Convergence. Technologies Across Learning Contexts pp 262-273 | Cite as
Interaction Analysis Supporting Participants’ Self-regulation in a Generic CSCL System
Conference paper
Abstract
Interaction analysis can provide information directly to learners and teachers in order to assess and self-regulate their ongoing activity. Omega+ is a generic CSCL system that uses explicit models as parameters for flexibly supporting different kinds of collaborative applications. This paper describes Omega+ model-based generic approach for supporting participants’ self-regulation through interaction analysis. Some quantitative and qualitative results obtained with the proposed approach are discussed.
Keywords
collaborative learning CSCL interaction analysis coaching self-regulation generic system model-based approachPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Resta, P., Laferrière, T.: Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review 19, 65–83 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Baker, M.J., Quignard, M., Lund, K., Séjourné, A.: Computer-supported collaborative learning in the space of debate. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Bergen, Norway, pp. 11–20 (2003)Google Scholar
- 3.Soller, A., Linton, F., Goodman, B., Lesgold, A.: Toward intelligent analysis and support of collaborative learning interaction. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 75–82. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
- 4.Suthers, D., Jones, D.: An architecture for intelligent collaborative educational systems. In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. on artificial intelligence in education, pp. 55–62. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
- 5.Baker, M.J., Lund, K.: Flexibly structuring the interaction in a CSCL environment. In: Proceedings of Euro AIED, Lisbon, Portugal. Edições Colibri, pp. 401–407 (1996)Google Scholar
- 6.Jaspers, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G.: COSAR: Collaborative writing of argumentative texts. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 269–272. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dimitracopoulou, A.: Designing Collaborative Learning Systems: Current Trends & Future Research Agenda. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 115–124 (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Suthers, D.: Technology Affordances for Intersubjective Learning: A Thematic Agenda for CSCL. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 662–671 (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Lipponen, L.: Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Boulder, Colorado, pp. 72–81 (2002)Google Scholar
- 10.Lonchamp, J.: Supporting synchronous collaborative learning: A generic, multi-dimensional model. International Journal of CSCL 1(2), 247–276 (2006)Google Scholar
- 11.Jermann, P.: Computer Support for Interaction Regulation in Collaborative Problem-Solving. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Geneva (2004)Google Scholar
- 12.Suthers, D., Xu, J., Kukakuka, J.: An Online Environment for Artifact-Centered Discourse. In: Proceedings of 11th WWW Conference, pp. 472–480 (2002)Google Scholar
- 13.Dillenbourg, P., Traum, D.: Sharing solutions: persistence and grounding in multi-modal collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences 15(1), 121–151 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.De Chiara, R., Di Matteo, A., Manno, I., Scarano, V.: CoFFEE: Cooperative Face2Face Educational Environment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007), New York, USA (2007)Google Scholar
- 15.Lonchamp, J.: Floor Control in Complex Synchronous CSCL Systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technology (WebIST), Barcelona, Spain (2007)Google Scholar
- 16.Clark, H., Schaefer, E.: Contributing to Discourse. Cognitive Science 13, 259–294 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Lonchamp, J.: Linking Conversation and Task Objects in Complex Synchronous CSCL environments. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technology (WebIST), Barcelona, Spain (2007)Google Scholar
- 18.Dimitracopoulou, A., et al.: State of the Art on Interaction Analysis: Interaction Analysis Indicators. ICALTS Project Deliverable: D.26.1 (2004), http://telearn.noe-kaleidoscope.org
- 19.Ingram, A.L., Hathorn, L.G.: Methods for Analyzing Collaboration in Online Communications. In: Roberts, T.S. (ed.) Online collaborative learning: theory and practice, pp. 215–241. Idea Group Inc., Hershey (2004)Google Scholar
- 20.Nonaka, I., Takeushi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, pp. 61–85. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
- 21.Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lovins, J.B.: Development of a stemming algorithm. Mechanical Translation and Computational Linguistics 11, 22–31 (1968)Google Scholar
- 23.Suthers, D.: Implications of Shared Representations for Computational Modeling. In: Proceeding of the 2nd International Workshop on Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction, Maceió, Brazil, pp. 42–52 (2004)Google Scholar
- 24.Anjewierden, A., Kollöffel, B., Hulshof, C.: Towards educational data mining: Using data mining methods for automated chat analysis to understand and support inquiry learning processes. In: International Workshop on Applying Data Mining in e-Learning, Crete, pp. 27–36 (2007)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008