Fetal Weight Prediction Models: Standard Techniques or Computational Intelligence Methods?

  • Tomáš Siegl
  • Pavel Kordík
  • Miroslav Šnorek
  • Pavel Calda
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5163)

Abstract

An accurate model of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight (EFW) can help in decision if the cesarean childbirth is necessary. We collected models from various sources and compared their accuracy. These models were mostly obtained by standard techniques such as linear and nonlinear regression. The aim of the comparison was to recommend a model best fitting to data measured for Czech population. Alternatively, we generated several linear and non-linear models by using our method GAME from the computational intelligence domain. GAME models can be serialized into simple equations that are understandable by domain experts. In this contribution, we show that automatically generated GAME models are at least as accurate (in terms of root mean squared error and standard deviations of predictions) as the best model computed by means of (time and expert skills demanding) standard techniques.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wlodzislaw, D.: What is Computational Intelligence and what could it become? Springer, Heidelberg (in Press, 2007), http://cogprints.org/5358/1/06-CIdef.pdf Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kolmogorov, A.N.: On the Representations of Continuous Functions of Many Variables by Superposition of Continuous Functions of One Variable and Addition. Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR 214, 953–956 (1957)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hecht-Nielsen, R.: Kolmogorov’s Mapping Neural Network Existence Theorem. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 11–14. IEEE Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ivakhnenko, A.G.: Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 1(1), 364–378 (1971)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madala, Ivakhnenko, H.A.: Inductive Learning Algorithm for Complex System Modelling. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kordik, P.: Fully automated knowledge extraction using Group of Adaptive Models Evolution. PhD thesis, Czech Technical University, Prague (March 2007), http://neuron.felk.cvut.cz/game/doc.html
  7. 7.
    Brown, R.: Diversity in Neural Network Ensembles. PhD thesis, The University of Birmingham, School of Computer Science, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom (January 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hansen, L., Salamon, P.: Neural network ensembles. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 12(10), 993–1001 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tetko, I.V., Livingstone, D.J., Luik, A.I.: Neural Network Studies. Comparison of Overfitting and Overtraining. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35, 826–833 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colman, A., Maharaj, D., Hutton, J., Tuohy, J.: Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies. Journal of he New Zealand Medical Association l19(1241) (September 8, 2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deter, R.L., Hadlock, F.P.: Use of ultrasound in the detection of macrosomia: A review. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 13(8), 519–524 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shepard, M.J., Richards, V.A., Berkowitz, R.L.: An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 142(1), 47–54 (1982)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dudley, N.J.: A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 25, 80–89 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hebbar, S.: Critical Evaluation of Various Methods of Estimating Fetal Weight by Ultrasound. J. Obstet Gynecol. Ind. 53(2), 131–133 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nahum, G.G.: Estimation of Fetal Weight. eMedicine (May 13, 2007), http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3281.htm

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomáš Siegl
    • 1
  • Pavel Kordík
    • 1
  • Miroslav Šnorek
    • 1
  • Pavel Calda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Engineering, FEECzech Technical UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations