Graph-Based Tools: The Contest

  • Arend Rensink
  • Pieter Van Gorp
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5214)


This event is the second instance of the contest for graph transformation-based tools, which was first held as part of the AGTIVE workshop. The aim is to stimulate tool development by providing a sense of competitiveness, as well as the chance to get to know and learn from the features of other, related tools.


Model Transformation Graph Transformation Business Process Modelling Formation Tool BPEL Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dumas, M.: Transforming BPMN process models to BPEL process definitions (2008),
  2. 2.
    Fuß, C., Mosler, C., Ranger, U., Schultchen, E.: The jury is still out: A comparison of AGG, Fujaba, and PROGRES. In: Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques (GT-VMT). Electronic Comm. of the EASST, vol. 6 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geiß, R., Batz, G.V., Grund, D., Hack, S., Szalkowski, A.: GrGen: A fast SPO-based graph rewriting tool. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Montanari, U., Ribeiro, L., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4178, pp. 383–397. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoffmann, B., Perez, J., Mens, T.: A case study for program refactoring (2008),
  5. 5.
    Nagl, M., Schürr, A., Zündorf, A. (eds.): Applications of Graph Transformation with Industrial Relevance. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rensink, A., Schmidt, Varró, D.: Model checking graph transformations: A comparison of two approaches. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Parise-Presicce, F., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3256, pp. 226–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rensink, A., Taentzer, G.: AGTIVE 2007 graph transformation tool contest. In: [5]Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taentzer, G., Biermann, E., Bisztray, D., Bohnet, B., Boneva, I., Boronat, A., Geiß, R., Horvath, Á., Kniemeyer, O., Mens, T., Ness, B., Plump, D., Vajk, T.: Generation of Sierpinski triangles: A case study for graph transformation tools. In: [5]Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Varró, G., Schürr, A., Varró, D.: Benchmarking for graph transformation. In: IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), pp. 79–88. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zündorf, A.: The antworld simulation tool case (2008),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arend Rensink
    • 1
  • Pieter Van Gorp
    • 2
  1. 1.Universiteit Twente 
  2. 2.Universiteit Antwerpen 

Personalised recommendations