The Verb Argument Browser

  • Bálint Sass
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5246)


We present a special corpus query tool – the Verb Argument Browser – which is suitable for investigating argument structure of verbs. It can answer the following typical research question: What are the salient words which can appear in a free position of a given verb frame? In other words: What are the most important collocates of a given verb (or verb frame) in a particular morphosyntactic position? At present, the Hungarian National Corpus is integrated, but the methodology can be extended to other languages and corpora. The application has been of significant help in building lexical resources (e.g. the Hungarian WordNet) and it can be useful in any lexicographic work or even language teaching. The tool is available online at (username: tsd, password: vab).


Machine Translation Direct Object Salient Object Argument Structure Prepositional Phrase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Firth, J.R.: A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. Studies in linguistic analysis, 1–32 (1957)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Smrž, P., Tugwell, D.: The Sketch Engine. In: Proceedings of EURALEX, Lorient, France, pp. 105–116 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Váradi, T.: The Hungarian National Corpus. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2002), Las Palmas, Spain, pp. 385–389 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sass, B.: Igei vonzatkeretek az MNSZ tagmondataiban [Verb frames in the clauses of the Hungarian National Corpus]. In: Proceedings of the 4th Magyar Számítógépes Nyelvészeti Konferencia [Hungarian Conference on Computational Linguistics] (MSZNY2006), Szeged, Hungary, pp. 15–21 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kilgarriff, A., Tugwell, D.: Word Sketch: Extraction and display of significant collocations for lexicography. In: Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, workshop on COLLOCATION: Computational Extraction, Analysis and Exploitation, Toulouse, pp. 32–38 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuti, J., Varasdi, K., Gyarmati, Á., Vajda, P.: Hungarian WordNet and representation of verbal event structure. Acta Cybernetica 18, 315–328 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gábor, K., Héja, E.: Clustering Hungarian verbs on the basis of complementation patterns. In: Proceedings of the ACL-SRW 2007 conference, Prague (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sass, B.: First attempt to automatically generate Hungarian semantic verb classes. In: Proceedings of the 4th Corpus Linguistics conference, Birmingham (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stefanowitsch, A.: Negative evidence and the raw frequency fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2, 61–77 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sampson, G.R.: Grammar without grammaticality. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3, 1–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bálint Sass
    • 1
  1. 1.Pázmány Péter Catholic UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations