Advertisement

Integrating Document Features for Entity Ranking

  • Jianhan Zhu
  • Dawei Song
  • Stefan Rüger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4862)

Abstract

The Knowledge Media Institute of the Open University participated in the entity ranking and entity list completion tasks of the Entity Ranking Track in INEX 2007. In both the entity ranking and entity list completion tasks, we have considered document features in addition to a basic document content based relevance model. These document features include categorizations of documents, relevance of category names to the query, and hierarchical relations between categories. Furthermore, based on our TREC2006 and 2007 expert search approach, we applied a co-occurrence based entity association discovery model to the two tasks based on the assumption that relevant entities often co-occur with query terms or given relevant entities in documents. Our initial experimental results show that, by considering the predefined category, its children and grandchildren in the document content based relevance model, the performance of our entity ranking approach can be significantly improved. Consideration of the predefined category’s parents, a category name based relevance model, and the co-occurrence model is not shown to be helpful in entity ranking and list completion, respectively.

Keywords

entity ranking list completion entity retrieval categories 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailey, P., Craswell, N., de Vries, A.P., Soboroff, I.: Overview of the TREC 2007 Enterprise Track (DRAFT). In: Proc. of The Sixteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007), Gaithersburg, Maryland USA (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Craswell, N., de Vries, A.P., Soboroff, I.: Overview of the TREC-2005 Enterprise Track. In: Proc. of The Fourteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soboroff, I., de Vries, A.P., Craswell, N.: Overview of the TREC 2006 Enterprise Track. In: Proc. of The Fifteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2006), Gaithers-burg, Maryland, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu, J., Song, D., Rüger, S., Eisenstadt, M., Motta, E.: The Open University at TREC 2006 Enterprise Track Expert Search Task. In: Proc. of The Fifteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2006) (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu, J., Song, D., Rüger, S., Eisenstadt, M., Motta, E.: The Open University at TREC 2006 Enterprise Track Expert Search Task. In: Proc. of The Sixteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007), Notebook (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conrad, J.G., Utt, M.H.: A System for Discovering Relationships by Feature Extraction from Text Databases. In: Proc. of SIGIR 1994, pp. 260–270 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Beaulieu, M.M., Gatford, M., Payne, A.: Okapi at TREC-4. In: NIST Special Publication 500-236: The Fourth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-04), pp. 73–96 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hatcher, E., Gospodnetic, O.: Lucene in Action. Manning Publications Co. (2004) ISBN: 1932394281Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cao, Y., Liu, J., Bao, S., Li, H.: Research on Expert Search at Enterprise Track of TREC 2005. In: Proc. of TREC (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianhan Zhu
    • 1
  • Dawei Song
    • 1
  • Stefan Rüger
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Media InstituteThe Open UniversityUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations