L3S at INEX 2007: Query Expansion for Entity Ranking Using a Highly Accurate Ontology

  • Gianluca Demartini
  • Claudiu S. Firan
  • Tereza Iofciu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4862)

Abstract

Entity ranking on Web scale datasets is still an open challenge. Several resources, as for example Wikipedia-based ontologies, can be used to improve the quality of the entity ranking produced by a system. In this paper we focus on the Wikipedia corpus and propose algorithms for finding entities based on query relaxation using category information. The main contribution is a methodology for expanding the user query by exploiting the semantic structure of the dataset. Our approach focuses on constructing queries using not only keywords from the topic, but also information about relevant categories. This is done leveraging on a highly accurate ontology which is matched to the character strings of the topic. The evaluation is performed using the INEX 2007 Wikipedia collection and entity ranking topics. The results show that our approach performs effectively, especially for early precision metrics.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bast, H., Chitea, A., Suchanek, F., Weber, I.: Ester: efficient search on text, entities, and relations. In: SIGIR 2007: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 671–678. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell, C.S., Maglio, P.P., Cozzi, A., Dom, B.: Expertise identification using email communications. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2003), pp. 528–531 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng, T., Yan, X., Chang, K.C.-C.: Entityrank: Searching entities directly and holistically. In: VLDB, pp. 387–398 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craswell, N., Hawking, D., Vercoustre, A., Wilkins, P.: P@noptic Expert: Searching for Experts not just for Documents, Ausweb (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, J., Boley, H., Bhavsar, V.C., Mei, J.: Expert finding for eCollaboration using FOAF with RuleML rules. In: Montreal Conference on eTechnologies (MCTECH) (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McLean, A., Vercoustre, A.M., Wu, M.: Enterprise PeopleFinder: Combining Evidence from Web Pages and Corporate Data. In: Proceedings of Australian Document Computing Symposium (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 697–706 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, J., Ackerman, M.S., Adamic, L.: Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 221–230 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu, J., Gonçalves, A.L., Uren, V.S., Motta, E., Pacheco, R.: Mining Web Data for Competency Management. In: Web Intelligence 2005, pp. 94–100 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianluca Demartini
    • 1
  • Claudiu S. Firan
    • 1
  • Tereza Iofciu
    • 1
  1. 1.L3S Research CenterLeibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations