Advertisement

Justice and Reconciliation in the Aftermath of the Civil War in Gorongosa, Mozambique Central*

  • Victor Igreja

Abstract

In the aftermath of the protracted Mozambican civil war (1976–1992), the national political authorities opted for an unconditional amnesty law for wartime crimes. Neither the cadres from the Frelimo-led government, nor the Renamo leadership offered public explanations as to why no politico-legal initiatives were to be forthcoming in the post-civil war period to actively address issues of accountability for the wartime crimes. The representatives of Christian religious groups and the members of the international community, who played a key role in brokering the Mozambican peace agreement, also remained silenced vis-à-vis issues of accountability in post-civil war period. War survivors were simply advised to forget what had happened, to forgive and to reconcile with one another. The only reference to justice was the emphasis placed on “you shall not take revenge upon your fellow man.” Robert Cover had insightfully observed that in a society “each group must accommodate in its own normative world the objective reality of the other. There may or may not be synchronization or convergence in their respective understandings about the normative boundary and what it implies” (quoted in Minow et al. 1995, p. 125).

Following this perspective of multiple normative sources and boundaries, in a society, the Mozambican state officials failed to consider the implications that their enacted unconditional amnesty law would have in the communities that had been severely affected by the civil war violence. In some of these communities, the normative world or ethics of reciprocity demands accountability over serious past wrongs. In the former war zones of the Gorongosa district, one of the features of the ethics of reciprocity is that micero ai vundi, i.e., a conflict does not get rotten unless when there is an active resolution by the legitimate institutions. Based on the rule that implies the rejection of silence as a mechanism to cease a conflict, this paper analyses the enactment of the local ethics of reciprocity through the intervention of a civil-war-related spirit named gamba (magamba in plural) in the former epicentres of the civil war in Gorongosa district, in the centre of Mozambique.

Keywords

Restorative Justice International Criminal Court Transitional Justice Peace Agreement Spirit Possession 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen T (2006) Trial justice: the international criminal court and lord's resistance army. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen S (2001) States of denial: knowing about atrocities and suffering. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Connerton P (1989) How societies remember. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Elias N (1970) What is sociology? Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Fry D (2006) The human potential for peace: an anthropological challenge to assumptions about war and violence. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenhouse C (2002) Introduction: altered states, altered lives. Ethnography in unstable places: everyday lives in contexts of dramatic political change. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  7. Hanlon J (1991) Who calls the shots? Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayner P (2001) Unspeakable truths: confronting state terror and atrocity. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Igreja V (2003) Why are there many drums playing until dawn? Exploring the role of gamba spirits and healers in the post-war recovery period in Gorongosa, Central Mozambique. Transcult Psychiatry 40:459–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Igreja V (2008) Igreja V (2008) Memories as weapons: the politics of peace and silence in post-civil war Mozambique. J South Afr Stud 34(3): 539–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Igreja V, Dias-Lambranca B (2008) Restorative justice and the role of magamba spirits in post-civil war Gorongosa, Central Mozambique. In: Huyse L, Salter M (eds) Traditional justice and reconciliation after violent conflict: learning from African experiences. International IDEA, Stockholm, pp 61–83Google Scholar
  12. Igreja V, Kleijn W, Richters A (2006) Women's posttraumatic suffering after the war in Mozambique. J Nerv Ment Dis 194:502–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Igreja V, Dias-Lambranca B, Richters A (2008) Gamba spirits, gender relations and healing in post-civil war Gorongosa, Mozambique. J R Anthropol Inst 14:350–371Google Scholar
  14. Kleinman A (1997) Writing at the margin: discourse between anthropology and medicine. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Long W, Brecke P (2003) War and reconciliation: Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Marlin R (2001) Possessing the past: legacies of violence and reproductive illness in central Mozambique. Ph.D. thesis, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. Minow M, Ryan M, Sarat A (1995) Narrative, violence and the law: the essays of Robert Cover. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  18. Molenaar A (2005) Gacaca: grassroots justice after genocide. African Studies Centre, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  19. Perera S (2001) Spirit possessions and avenging ghosts. In: Das V, Kleinman A, Lock M, Ramphele M, Reynolds P (eds) Remaking a world: violence, social suffering, and recovery. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 157–200Google Scholar
  20. Rosenthal J (2002) Trance against the state. In: Greenhouse CJ, Mertz E, Warren KB (eds) Ethnography in unstable places: everyday lives in contexts of dramatic political change. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 316–351Google Scholar
  21. Sriram C (2004) Confronting past human rights violations: justice vs peace in times of transition. Frank Cass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Teitel R (2000) Transitional justice. New York, NY: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomashausen A (2001) Mozambique: a case study. In: Conference on Politics of Identity and Exclusion in Africa. University of Pretoria, Pretoria www.kas.de/db files/dokumente/ 7 dokument dok pdf 5094 2.pdfGoogle Scholar
  24. Tomuschat C (2003) Human rights: between idealism and realism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Trindade J (2003) Rupturas e continuidades nos processos politicos e juridicos. In: Conflito e transformação social: Uma paisagem das justiças em Moçambique. Edições Afrontamento, Porto, pp 97–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Igreja
    • 1
  1. 1.Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict StudiesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations