Multilateral Secure Cross-Community Reputation Systems for Internet Communities

  • Franziska Pingel
  • Sandra Steinbrecher
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5185)

Abstract

The Internet gives people various possibilities to interact with each other. Many interactions need trust that interactors behave in a way one expects them to do. If people are able to build reputation about their past behaviour this might help others to estimate their future behaviour. Reputation systems were designed to store and manage these reputations in a technically efficient way. Most reputation systems were designed for the use in single Internet communities although there are similarities between communities. In this paper we present a multilateral secure reputation system that allows to collect and use reputation in a set of communities interoperable with the reputation system. We implemented our system for the community software phpBB.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borcea-Pfitzmann, K., Hansen, M., Liesebach, K., Pfitzmann, A., Steinbrecher, S.: What user-controlled identity management should learn from communities. Information Security Technical Report 11(3), 119–128 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaum, D.: Showing credentials without identification. In: Pichler, F. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1985. LNCS, vol. 219, pp. 241–244. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clauß, S., Pfitzmann, A., Hansen, M., Van Herreweghen, E.: Privacy-enhancing identity management. The IPTS Report 67, 8–16 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clauß, S., Köhntopp, M.: Identity management and its support of multilateral security. Computer Networks 37(2), 205–219 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dellarocas, C.: Research note – how often should reputation mechanisms update a trader’s reputation profile? Information Systems Research 17, 271–285 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ENISA. Position Paper no.2. Reputation-based Systems: A Security Analysis (October 2007), http://www.enisa.europa.eu/doc/pdf/deliverables/enisa_pp_reputation_based_system.pdf
  7. 7.
    Friedman, E., Resnick, P.: The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, 173–199 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Josang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems 43, 618–644 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahler, T., Olsen, T.: Reputation systems and data protection law. In: eAdoption and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies, pp. 180–187. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pfitzmann, A.: Technologies for multilateral security. In: Müller, G., Rannenberg, K. (eds.) Multilateral Security for Global Communication, pp. 85–91. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E.: Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM 43(12), 45–48 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steinbrecher, S.: Design options for privacy-respecting reputation systems within centralised internet communities. In: Proceedings of IFIP Sec 2006, 21st IFIP International Information Security Conference: Security and Privacy in Dynamic Environments (May 2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franziska Pingel
    • 1
  • Sandra Steinbrecher
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakultät InformatikTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations