Reasoning Web pp 125-170 | Cite as

Semantic Multimedia

  • Steffen Staab
  • Ansgar Scherp
  • Richard Arndt
  • Raphael Troncy
  • Marcin Grzegorzek
  • Carsten Saathoff
  • Simon Schenk
  • Lynda Hardman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5224)


Multimedia constitutes an interesting field of application for Semantic Web and Semantic Web reasoning, as the access and management of multimedia content and context depends strongly on the semantic descriptions of both. At the same time, multimedia resources constitute complex objects, the descriptions of which are involved and require the foundation on sound modeling practice in order to represent findings of low- and high level multimedia analysis and to make them accessible via Semantic Web querying of resources. This tutorial aims to provide a red thread through these different issues and to give an outline of where Semantic Web modeling and reasoning needs to further contribute to the area of semantic multimedia for the fruitful interaction between these two fields of computer science.


Multimedia Content Domain Ontology Semantic Annotation Multimedia Document Multimedia Presentation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adali, S., Sapino, M.L., Subrahmanian, V.S.: An algebra for creating and querying multimedia presentations. Multimedia Syst. 8(3), 212–230 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahern, S., Naaman, M., Nair, R., Yang, J.H.-I.: World explorer: visualizing aggregate data from unstructured text in geo-referenced collections. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries, pp. 1–10. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arndt, R., Troncy, R., Staab, S., Hardman, L., Vacura, M.: COMM: Designing a Well-Founded Multimedia Ontology for the Web. In: 6th Int. Semantic Web Conference (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blöhdorn, S., Petridis, K., Saathoff, C., Simou, N., Tzouvaras, V., Avrithis, Y., Handschuh, S., Kompatsiaris, Y., Staab, S., Strintzis, M.: Semantic Annotation of Images and Videos for Multimedia Analysis. In: 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brunelli, R., Poggio, T.: Template matching: Matched spatial filters and beyond. Pattern Recognition 30(5), 751–768 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brusilovsky, P., Maybury, M.T.: From adaptive hypermedia to the adaptive Web. Communications of the ACM 45(5), 30–33 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, H., Shimshoni, I., Meer, P.: Model based object recognition by robust information fusion. In: 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Cambrige, UK (August 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J.: An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.N.: Support vector networks. Machine Learning 20, 273–297 (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D.: Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness. Technical Report GIT-GVU-99-22, Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center and College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA (June 1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding, D., Yang, J., Li, Q., Liu, W., Wang, L.: What can expressive semantics tell: Retrieval model for a flash-movie search engine. In: Leow, W.-K., Lew, M., Chua, T.-S., Ma, W.-Y., Chaisorn, L., Bakker, E.M. (eds.) CIVR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3568, pp. 123–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eco, U.: Einfuehrung in die Semiotik. Wilhelm Fink Verlag, Munich (1985)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falkovych, K., Nack, F.: Context Aware Guidance for Multimedia Authoring: Harmonizing domain and discourse knowledge. Multimedia Systems Journal 11(3) (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Falkovych, K., Nack, F., van Ossenbruggen, J., Rutledge, L.: Sample: Towards a framework for system-supported multimedia authoring. In: Multimedia Modelling, p. 362. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fink, J., Kobsa, A., Schreck, J.: Personalized hypermedia information through adaptive and adaptable system features: User modeling, privacy and security issues. In: Mullery, A., Besson, M., Campolargo, M., Gobbi, R., Reed, R. (eds.) Intelligence in Services and Networks: Technology for Cooperative Competition, pp. 459–467. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flickner, M., Sawhney, H., Niblack, W., Ashley, J., Huang, Q., Dom, B., Gorkani, M., Hafner, J., Lee, D., Petkovic, D., Steele, D., Yanker, P.: Query by image and video content: the QBIC system. In: Readings in multimedia computing and networking, pp. 255–264. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gangemi, A., Borgo, S., Catenacci, C., Lehmann, J.: Task Taxonomies for Knowledge Content. Technical report, Metokis Deliverable 7, (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with dolce. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garcia, R., Celma, O.: Semantic Integration and Retrieval of Multimedia Metadata. In: 5th International Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    García, R., Gil, R.: Facilitating Business Interoperability from the Semantic Web. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4439, pp. 220–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garcia, R., Gil, R., Delgado, J.: A Web Ontologies Framework for Digital Rights Management. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Law 15, 137–154 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gemmell, J., Bell, G., Lueder, R.: Mylifebits: a personal database for everything. Commun. ACM 49(1), 88–95 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gemmell, J., Williams, L., Wood, K., Lueder, R., Bell, G.: Passive capture and ensuing issues for a personal lifetime store. In: Proceedings of the the 1st ACM workshop on Continuous archival and retrieval of personal experiences, pp. 48–55. ACM Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Geurts, J., van Ossenbruggen, J., Hardman, L.: Application-specific constraints for multimedia presentation generation. In: Multimedia Modeling. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Geurts, J., van Ossenbruggen, J., Hardman, L.: Requirements for practical multimedia annotation. In: Workshop on Multimedia and the Semantic Web (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gräßl, C., Deinzer, F., Nieman, H.: Continuous parametrization of normal distribution for improving the discrete statistical eigenspace approach for object recognition. In: Krasnoproshin, V., Ablameyko, S., Soldek, J. (eds.) Pattern Recognition and Information Processing 2003, Minsk, Belarus, May 2003, pp. 73–77 (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grzegorzek, M., Izquierdo, E.: Statistical 3d object classification and localization with context modeling. In: Domanski, M., Stasinski, R., Bartkowiak, M. (eds.) 15th European Signal Processing Conference, pp. 1585–1589. PTETiS, Poznan (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Halasz, F., Schwartz, M.: The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model. Communications of the ACM 37(2), 30–39 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harth, A., Umbrich, J., Hogan, A., Decker, S.: Yars2: A federated repository for searching and querying graph structured data. Technical report, Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Galway, 4 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hornegger, J.: Statistische Modellierung, Klassifikation und Lokalisation von Objekten. Shaker Verlag, Aachen (1996)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hunter, J.: Adding Multimedia to the Semantic Web - Building an MPEG-7 Ontology. In: 1st International Semantic Web Working Symposium, pp. 261–281 (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hunter, J.: Combining the CIDOC/CRM and MPEG-7 to Describe Multimedia in Museums. In: 6th Museums and the Web Conference (2002),
  34. 34.
    Hunter, J.: Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 13(1), 49–58 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hunter, J., Armstrong, L.: A Comparison of Schemas for Video Metadata Representation. In: 8th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 1431–1451 (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hunter, J., Little, S.: A Framework to Enable the Semantic Inferencing and Querying of Multimedia Content. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology – Special Issue on the Semantic Web 2(2/3), 264–286 (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Isaac, A., Troncy, R.: Designing and Using an Audio-Visual Description Core Ontology. In: Workshop on Core Ontologies in Ontology Engineering (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kang, H., Shneiderman, B.: Visualization methods for personal photo collections: Browsing and searching in the photofinder. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (III), pp. 1539–1542 (August 2000)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kerr, J., Compton, P.: Toward generic model-based object recognition by knowledge acquisition and machine learning. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 9–15 (2003)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    King, R., Popitsch, N., Westermann, U.: METIS: a flexible database foundation for unified media management. In: Proc.of the 12th annual ACM Int. Conf. on Multimedia, pp. 744–745. ACM Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J., Pohl, W.: Personalized Hypermedia Presentation Techniques for Improving Online Customer Relationships. In: The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 16, pp. 111–155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kochut, K., Janik, M.: Sparqler: Extended sparql for semantic association discovery. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 145–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lagoze, C., Hunter, J.: The ABC Ontology and Model (v3.0). Journal of Digital Information 2(2) (2001)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Latecki, L.J., Lakaemper, R., Wolter, D.: Optimal partial shape similarity. Image and Vision Computing Journal 23, 227–236 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lee, B.N., Chen, W., Chang, E.Y.: Fotofiti: web service for photo management. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, pp. 485–486. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lee, T., Sheng, L., Balkir, N.H., Al-Hamdani, A., Özsoyoglu, G., Özsoyoglu, Z.M.: Query Processing Techniques for Multimedia Presentations. Multimedia Tools Appl. 11(1), 63–99 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee, T., Sheng, L., Bozkaya, T., Balkir, N.H., Özsoyoglu, Z.M., Özsoyoglu, G.: Querying Multimedia Presentations Based on Content. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 11(3), 361–385 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Leonardis, A., Bischof, H.: Dealing with occlusions in the eigenspace approach. In: Pelillo, M., Hancock, E.R. (eds.) EMMCVPR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1223, pp. 453–458. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Moghaddam, B., Pentland, A.: Probabilistic visual learning for object representation. PAMI 19(7), 696–710 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mokhtarian, F., Bober, M.: Curvature Scale Space Representation: Theory, Applications, and MPEG7-Standardization. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    MPEG-21. Part 17: Fragment Identification of MPEG Resources. Standard No. ISO/IEC 21000-17 (2006)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    MPEG-7. Multimedia Content Description Interface. Standard No. ISO/IEC 15938 (2001)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Murase, H., Nayar, S.K.: Visual learning and recognition of 3-d objects from appearance. International Journal of Computer Vision 14(1), 5–24 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Naaman, M., Yeh, R.B., Garcia-Molina, H., Paepcke, A.: Leveraging context to resolve identity in photo albums. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pp. 178–187. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nack, F.: AUTEUR: The Application of Video Semantics and Theme Representation for Automated Film Editing. PhD thesis, Lancaster University, UK (September 1996)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nack, F., Hardman, L.: Denotative and connotative semantics in hypermedia: proposal for a semiotic-aware architecture. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 7(1), 7–37 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nack, F., Lindsay, A.T.: Everything you wanted to know about MPEG-7 (Parts I & II). IEEE Multimedia 6(3-4) (1999)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nack, F., van Ossenbruggen, J., Hardman, L.: That Obscure Object of Desire: Multimedia Metadata on the Web (Part II). IEEE Multimedia 12(1) (2005)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Neumann, B., Möller, R.: On Scene Interpretation with Description Logics. In: Cognitive Vision Systems, pp. 247–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Niemann, H.: Klassifikation von Mustern. Springer, Heidelberg (1983)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Oberle, D., Lamparter, S., Grimm, S., Vrandecic, D., Staab, S., Gangemi, A.: Towards Ontologies for Formalizing Modularization and Communication in Large Software Systems. Journal of Applied Ontology 1(2), 163–202 (2006)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sirma Group Corp Ontotext Lab. Bigowlim: System documentation (2006) [15-05-2008],
  63. 63.
    van Ossenbruggen, J., Nack, F., Hardman, L.: That Obscure Object of Desire: Multimedia Metadata on the Web (Part I). IEEE Multimedia 11(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Park, S., Lee, J., Kim, S.: Content-based image classification using a neural network. Pattern Recognition Letters 25(3), 287–300 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Paulus, D., Hornegger, J.: Applied Pattern Recognition. Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH, Braunschweig (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Pease, A., Niles, I., Li, J.: The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology: A Large Ontology for the Semantic Web and its Applications. In: Working Notes of the AAAI-2002 Workshop on Ontologies and the Semantic Web (2002)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Polleres, A., Scharffe, F., Schindlauer, R.: Sparql++ for mapping between rdf vocabularies. In: OTM Conferences (1), pp. 878–896 (2007)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Polydoros, P., Tsinaraki, C., Christodoulakis, S.: GraphOnto: OWL-based ontology management and multimedia annotation in the DS-MIRF framework. Journal of Digital Information Management (JDIM) 4(4), 214–219 (2006)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Popper, K.: Three worlds [the tanner lecture on human values: Delivered at the university of michigan], April (1978),
  70. 70.
    Pösl, J.: Erscheinungsbasierte, statistische Objekterkennung. Shaker Verlag, Aachen (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pratt, W.K.: Digital Image Processing. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Reinhold, M.: Robuste, probabilistische, erscheinungsbasierte Objekterkennung. Logos Verlag, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ross, K., Westermann, G.U., Popitsch, N.: METIS - A Flexible Database Solution for the Management of Multimedia Assets. In: Proc. of the 10th Int. Workshop on Multimedia Information Systems, College Park, MD, USA (August 2004)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Saathoff, C., Staab, S.: Exploiting Spatial Context in Images Using Fuzzy Constraint Reasoning. In: 9th Int. Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, Klagenfurt, Austria. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Schenk, S., Staab, S.: Networked graphs: A declarative mechanism for sparql rules, sparql views and rdf data integration on the web. In: Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference, WWW2008, Bejing, China (2008)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Scherp, A., Agaram, S., Jain, R.: Event-centric media management. In: Gevers, T., Jain, R.C., Santini, S. (eds.) Multimedia Content Access: Algorithms and Systems II. Proceedings of the SPIE Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, vol. 6820, pp. 68200C-68200C-15 (January 2008)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Scherp, A.: Semantics support for personalized multimedia content. In: Int. Conf. Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications, Innsbruck, Austria, March 2008, pp. 57–65. IASTED (2008)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Scherp, A., Boll, S., Cremer, H.: Emergent semantics in personalized multimedia content. J. of Digital Information Management 5(2) (April 2007)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Scherp, A., Jain, R.: Towards an ecosystem for semantics. In: MS 2007: Workshop on multimedia information retrieval on The many faces of multimedia semantics, pp. 3–12. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Schilit, B., Adams, N., Want, R.: Context-Aware Computing Applications. In: Workshop on Mobil Computing Systems and Applications, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, pp. 85–90. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1994)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Schmidt, A., Beigl, M., Gellersen, H.-W.: There is more to context than location. Computers & Graphics 23(6), 893–901 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Schueler, B., Sizov, S., Staab, S., Tran, D.T.: Querying for meta knowledge. In: WWW 2008: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 625–634. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Shneiderman, B., Kang, H.: Direct annotation: A drag-and-drop strategy for labeling photos. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation, p. 88. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Straccia, U.: Managing Uncertainty and Vagueness in Description Logics, Logic Programs and Description Logic Programs. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R.: Methodology for development and employment of ontology based knowledge management applications. SIGMOD Rec. 31(4), 18–23 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tadeusiewicz, R.: Introduction to Practice of Application of Neural Networks (in Neuron Networks) StatSoft, Warsaw, Poland (1999)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Troncy, R.: Integrating Structure and Semantics into Audio-visual Documents. In: 2nd International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 566–581 (2003)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Troncy, R., Bailer, W., Hausenblas, M., Hofmair, P., Schlatte, R.: Enabling Multimedia Metadata Interoperability by Defining Formal Semantics of MPEG-7 Profiles. In: 1st International Conference on Semantics And digital Media Technology, pp. 41–55 (2006)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Troncy, R., Celma, Ó., Little, S., García, R., Tsinaraki, C.: MPEG-7 based Multimedia Ontologies: Interoperability Support or Interoperability Issue? In: 1st International Workshop on Multimedia Annotation and Retrieval enabled by Shared Ontologies, pp. 2–15 (2007)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Troncy, R., Hardman, L., van Ossenbruggen, J., Hausenblas, M.: Identifying Spatial and Temporal Media Fragments on the Web. In: W3C Video on the Web Workshop (2007),
  91. 91.
    Tsinaraki, C., Christodoulakis, S.: Interoperability of XML Schema Applications with OWL Domain Knowledge and Semantic Web Tools. In: 6th International Conference on Ontologies, DataBases, and Applications of Semantics (ODBASE) (2007)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tsinaraki, C., Polydoros, P., Christodoulakis, S.: Interoperability support for Ontology-based Video Retrieval Applications. In: 3rd International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR), pp. 582–591 (2004)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tsinaraki, C., Polydoros, P., Christodoulakis, S.: Interoperability support between MPEG-7/21 and OWL in DS-MIRF. Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE) 19(2), 219–232 (2007) (Special Issue on the Semantic Web Era)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Turk, M., Pentland, A.: Face recognition using eigenfaces. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Maui, USA, pp. 586–591 (June 1991)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    van Ossenbruggen, J., Hardman, L., Geurts, J., Rutledge, L.: Towards a multimedia formatting vocabulary. In: World Wide Web. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Vapnik, V.N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Walter, J., Arnrich, B.: Gabor filters for object localization and robot grasping. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain, September 2000. ICSP, pp. 124–127 (2000)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Westermann, U., Jain, R.: Toward a common event model for multimedia applications. IEEE MultiMedia 14(1), 19–29 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Yuan, C., Niemann, H.: Neural networks for the recognition and pose estimation of 3-d objects from a single 2-d perspective view. International Journal of Image and Vision Computing 19, 585–592 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steffen Staab
    • 1
  • Ansgar Scherp
    • 1
  • Richard Arndt
    • 1
  • Raphael Troncy
    • 2
  • Marcin Grzegorzek
    • 1
  • Carsten Saathoff
    • 1
  • Simon Schenk
    • 1
  • Lynda Hardman
    • 2
  1. 1.ISWeb Research GroupUniversity of Koblenz-LandauGermany
  2. 2.Semantic Media InterfacesCWI AmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations