Advertisement

Comparing Emotional vs. Envelope Feedback for ECAs

  • Astrid von der Pütten
  • Christian Reipen
  • Antje Wiedmann
  • Stefan Kopp
  • Nicole C. Krämer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5208)

Abstract

Opinions in the scientific community differ about what makes an ECA effective. This study investigated whether emotional expressions influence the effectiveness of human-agent-interaction the participants´ emotional status after the experiment. 70 participants took part in a small talk (10 min.) situation with the ECA MAX. We implemented two different types of feedback: emotional feedback (EMO), which provided a feedback about the emotional state of MAX (including smiles and compliments) and envelope feedback (ENV), which provided a feedback about the comprehension of the participants´ contributions and presents MAX as an attentive listener. We found that smiling was the only nonverbal behaviour which was significantly recognized and that the emotional feedback led to increased feelings of interest in the participants. There were no effects with regard to the evaluation of the effectiveness of the conversation.

Keywords

evaluation study nonverbal behavior emotional feedback envelope feedback social effects of ECAs 

References

  1. 1.
    Cassell, J., Thórisson, K.R.: The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope vs. Emotional Feedback. Animated Conversational Agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13, 519–538 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjálmsson, H., Yan, H.: Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: Rea. In: Proceedings of the CHI 1999 Conference, PA, Pittsburgh, pp. 520–527 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kopp, S., Allwood, J., Ahlsen, E., Grammer, K., Stocksmeier, T.: Modeling Embodied Feedback in a Virtual Human. In: Wachsmuth, I., Knoblich, G. (eds.) Modeling Communication With Humanoids And Robots, Springer, Hamburg (to appear)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of Oz studies – why and how. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Astrid von der Pütten
    • 1
  • Christian Reipen
    • 1
  • Antje Wiedmann
    • 1
  • Stefan Kopp
    • 2
  • Nicole C. Krämer
    • 1
  1. 1.University Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  2. 2.Artificial Intelligence GroupUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations