Advertisement

Using Swarm-GAP for Distributed Task Allocation in Complex Scenarios

  • Paulo R. FerreiraJr.
  • Felipe S. Boffo
  • Ana L. C. Bazzan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5043)

Abstract

This paper addresses distributed task allocation in complex scenarios modeled using the distributed constraint optimization problem (DCOP) formalism. It is well known that DCOP, when used to model complex scenarios, generates problems with exponentially growing number of parameters. However, those scenarios are becoming ubiquitous in real-world applications. Therefore, approximate solutions are necessary. We propose and evaluate an algorithm for distributed task allocation. This algorithm, called Swarm-GAP, is based on theoretical models of division of labor in social insect colonies. It uses a probabilistic decision model. Swarm-GAP is experimented both in a scenario from RoboCup Rescue and an abstract simulation environment. We show that Swarm-GAP achieves similar results as other recent proposed algorithm with a reduction in communication and computation. Thus, our approach is highly scalable regarding both the number of agents and tasks.

Keywords

Multiagent System Task Allocation Complex Scenario Average Reward Total Reward 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goldman, C., Zilberstein, S.: Decentralized control of cooperative systems: Categorization and complexity analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 22, 143–174 (2004)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kitano, H.: Robocup rescue: A grand challenge for multi-agent systems. In: Proc. of the 4th International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, Boston, USA, pp. 5–12. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lesser, V.: Cooperative multiagent systems: A personal view of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 11(1), 133–142 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maheswaran, R.T., Tambe, M., Bowring, E., Pearce, J.P., Varakantham, P.: Taking DCOP to the real world: Efficient complete solutions for distributed multi-event scheduling. In: Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Washington, DC, USA, July 2004, vol. 1, pp. 310–317. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Modi, P.J., Shen, W.-M., Tambe, M., Yokoo, M.: An asynchronous complete method for distributed constraint optimization. In: Proc. of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 161–168. ACM Press, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nair, R., Ito, T., Tambe, M., Marsella, S.: Task allocation in the rescue simulation domain: A short note. In: Birk, A., Coradeschi, S., Tadokoro, S. (eds.) RoboCup 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2377, pp. 751–754. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petcu, A., Faltings, B.: A scalable method for multiagent constraint optimization. In: Kaelbling, L.P., Saffiotti, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, Scotland, August 2005, pp. 266–271. Professional Book Center (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scerri, P., Farinelli, A., Okamoto, S., Tambe, M.: Allocating tasks in extreme teams. In: Proc. of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 727–734. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shmoys, D.B., Tardos, V.: An approximation algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Mathematical Programming 62(3), 461–474 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skinner, C., Barley, M.: Robocup rescue simulation competition: Status report. In: Bredenfeld, A., Jacoff, A., Noda, I., Takahashi, Y. (eds.) RoboCup 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4020, pp. 632–639. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.: Response threshold reinforcement and division of labour in insect societies. In: Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences, vol. 265, pp. 327–332 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paulo R. FerreiraJr.
    • 1
    • 2
  • Felipe S. Boffo
    • 1
  • Ana L. C. Bazzan
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de InformáticaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrasil
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciências Exatas e TecnológicasCentro Universitário FeevaleNovo HamburgoBrasil

Personalised recommendations