EGOV 2008: Electronic Government pp 25-36 | Cite as
Implementation Challenges: Competing Structures When New Public Management Meets eGovernment
Abstract
This article discusses practices, opportunities and challenges in local eGovernment project management; the development towards eGovern ment and “the 24/7 agency”. Analyzing a case against eGovernment success factors we find seven “critical issues”; political timing, resource allocation, political mandate, distinction between administrative and political responsibilities, coordination of departments, dependence on providers, and use of standards. These are issues where development is open for local choice, influences of strong stakeholders, and chance. This situation is a consequence of the prevailing strategic model for the public sector, New Public Manage ment. This model by design leaves these issues in a void which has to be filled by negotiations among many actors with different roles, goals, and action space. The general lesson is that the void needs to be filled strategically; to reduce the risk level and increase the ability to implement policy or it will be open for unexpected turns of events.
Keywords
eGovernment New Public Management Project Management 24/7 AgencyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Gore, Al.: Reengineering Through Information Technology. Accompanying Report of the National Performance Review. Office of the Vice President, Washington (1993)Google Scholar
- 2.Grant, G., Chau, D.: Developing a Generic Framework for E-Government. Journal of Global Information Management 13(1), 1–30 (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.Grönlund, Å.: Electronic Government – Design, Applications, and Management. Idea Group, Hershey (2002)Google Scholar
- 4.Grönlund, Å.: Introducing e-Gov: history, definitions, and issues. Communications of AIS 15 (2005) (electronic journal), http://www.cais.org
- 5.OECD, The e-Government Imperative. OECD e-Government Studies, Paris. ISBN 92-64-10117-9 (2003)Google Scholar
- 6.UN Global E-Government Readiness Report 2004. Towards Access For Opportunity. United Nations, Department for Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Public Administration and Development Management, New York (2004) (Retrieved December 29, 2005), www.unpan.org/egovernment4.asp
- 7.UNDESA e-Government at the Crossroads. World Public Sector Report 2003. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations, New York (2003) (Retrieved December 29, 2005), www.un.org/esa/desa/desaNews/desa94.html
- 8.Lau, E.: Electronic Government and the Drive for Growth and Equity. In: Mayer-Schönbeger, Lazer (eds.) From Electronic Government to Information Government, pp. 39–58. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
- 9.eGEP Measurement Framework Final Version, eGovernment Economics Project, European Commission, Brussels (2006a), http://217.59.60.50/eGEP/Static/Contents/final/D.2.4_Measurement_Framework_final_version.pdf (visited January 20, 2008)
- 10.eGEP Compendium to the Measurement Framework, eGovernment Economics Project, European Commission, Brussels (2006b), http://217.59.60.50/eGEP/Static/Contents/final/Measurement_Framework%20_Compendium.pdf (visited Jan 20, 2008)
- 11.Hughes & Owen (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., Tinkler, J.: Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and E-Government. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Boston, J., Martin, J., Pallot, J., Walsh, P.: Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Oxford University Press, Auckland (1996)Google Scholar
- 14.Ministry of Finance Swedish National Plan for eGovernment [Nationell handlingsplan för den svenska eFörvaltningen] (Retrieved March 3, 2008) (2008), http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/9942/a/96512
- 15.Örebro municipality executive board, Budget 2007 With Priority Goals for Örebro Municipal [Budget 2007 med prioriterade mål Örebro Kommun] (2006)Google Scholar
- 16.Steering committee member 2007, Interview held on October 31, 2007Google Scholar
- 17.Örebro Municipality, Örebro Municipal Complaints Procedure [Klagomålshantering i Örebro Kommun] (2007)Google Scholar
- 18.Steering committee member 2007, Interview held on November 28, 2007 Google Scholar
- 19.Project manager 2007, Interview held on November 28, 2007 Google Scholar
- 20.Verva Swedish National Guidelines for Public Sector Websites [Vägledningen 24-timmarswebben] (2007) (Retrieved February 1, 2008), http://www.verva.se/verksamhetsstod/webb/vl24/2006/2/1/3/
- 21.Hood, C.: The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20/2/3, 93–109 (1995)Google Scholar