Advertisement

Shock Waves pp 383-388 | Cite as

Structural response to detonation loading in 90-degree bend

  • Z. Liang
  • T. Curran
  • J.E. Shepherd

Summary

The structural response due to detonation propagation through a 90-degree bend in a circular tube was experimentally examined. Hoop strain measurements were obtained at key locations along the tube to measure elastic deformation. Dynamic pressure signals at the same locations were also recorded to track the detonation wave and record the peak pressure. Of particular interest are the effects of the bend on the magnitude of the pressure and strain in the material when compared to the straight tubes. These geometrical effects are due to the excitation of multiple modes: a short period detonation driven mode and longer period bending modes within the structure not seen in the straight tubes. The excitation of these bending modes serves to increase the maximum strain observed, which translates to greater hazards for industrial piping systems.

Keywords

Shock Wave Peak Pressure Detonation Wave Structural Response Straight Tube 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.E. Shepherd: ‘ASME Structural Response of Piping to Internal Gas Detonation’. PVP2006-ICPVT11-93670, (2006).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. M. Beltman and J.E. Shepherd: ‘Linear Elastic Rsponse of Tubes to Internal Detonation Loading’. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 252(4), (2002) pp. 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.E. Shepherd, A. Teodorcyzk, R. Knystautas, and J.H. Lee: ‘Shock waves produced by reflected detonations’. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 134, (1991), pp. 244-264.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.E. Shepherd, E. Schultz, and R. Akbar: ‘Detonation diffraction’. Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on Shock Waves, 1, (2000), pp. 4148.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. O. Thomas and R. L. Williams: ‘Detonation interactions with wedges and bends’. Shock Waves, 114, (2002) pp. 481-491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. O. Thomas: ‘The response of pipes and supports generated by gaseous detonations’. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 124, (2002) pp. 66-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Chao and J.E. Shepherd: ‘Detonation loading of tubes in the modified shear wave regime’. Proceedings of the 24nd International Symposium on Shock Waves, 2, (2005) pp. 865–870.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.C. Reynolds: ‘The element potential method for chemical equilibrium analysis: implementation in the interactive program STANJAN’. Stanford University, (1986).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Liang, T. Curran and J. E. Shepherd: ‘Structural Response to Detonation Loading in Piping Components’, California Institute of Technology Report FM2006.008 (2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Liang
    • 1
  • T. Curran
    • 1
  • J.E. Shepherd
    • 1
  1. 1.California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations