Advertisement

Cross-Curriculum Search for Intergeo

  • Paul Libbrecht
  • Cyrille Desmoulins
  • Christian Mercat
  • Colette Laborde
  • Michael Dietrich
  • Maxim Hendriks
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5144)

Abstract

Intergeo is a European project dedicated to the sharing of interactive geometry constructions. This project is setting up an annotation and search web platform which will offer and provide access to thousands of interactive geometry constructions and resources using them. The search platform should cross the boundaries of the curriculum standards of Europe. A topics and competency based approach to retrieval for interactive geometry with designation of the semantic entities has been adopted: it requests the contributor of an interactive geometry resource to input the competencies and topics involved in a construction, and allows the searcher to find it by the input of competencies and topics close to them; both rely on plain-text-input.

This paper describes the current prototypes, the input-methods, the workflows used, and the integration into the Intergeo platform.

Keywords

Curriculum Standard Semantic Entity Competency Base Approach False Friend Interactive Geometry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guin, D., Trouche, L.: Intégration des tice: concevoir, expérimenter et mutualiser des ressources pédagogiques. Repéres (55), 81–100 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., Brindley, S.: Teacher representations of the successful use of computer based and resources in secondary school english, mathematics and science. Teaching and Teacher Education 20(3), 259–275 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buswell, S., Caprotti, O., Carlisle, D., Dewar, M., Gaëtano, M., Kohlhase, M.: The openmath standard, version 2.0. Technical report, The OpenMath Society (2004), http://www.openmath.org/
  4. 4.
    Philippe, J.: Exploiter les logiciels de géométrie dynamique. 4 constructions géométriques avec Géoplan. Les Dossiers de l’ingénierie éducative (54), 35–37 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ait Ouassarah, A.: Cabri-géométre et systémes dynamiques. Bulletin de l’APMEP (433), 223–232 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Falcade, R., Laborde, C., Mariotti., A.: Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation. Educational Studies in Mathematics (66.3), 317–333 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hohenwarter, M.: GeoGebra: Dynamische Geometrie, Algebra und Analysis für die Schule. Computeralgebra-Rundbrief (35), 16–20 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Mathematical Society: Mathematical Subject Classfication (2000), http://www.ams.org/msc/
  9. 9.
    Karhima, J., Nurmonen, J., Pauna, M.: WebALT Metadata = LOM + CCD. In: Proceedings of the WebALT 2006 Conference, The WebALT project (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    OFSET: GNU Edu. (2008), http://gnuedu.ofset.org/
  11. 11.
    Paquette, G.: An ontology and a software framework for competency modeling and management. Educational Technology and Society 10(3), 1–21 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    British Educational Communication and Technology Agency: Curriculum online (2008), http://www.curriculumonline.gov.uk/
  13. 13.
    Microsoft: Microsoft Lesson Connection Launched At Technology + Learning Conference (1999), http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1999/nov99/lessonpr.mspx
  14. 14.
    ExploreLearning: Correlation of gizmos by state and textbooks (2005), http://www.explorelearning.com
  15. 15.
    van Rijsbergen, C.: Information Retrieval. Butterworths (1979), http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~iain/keith/
  16. 16.
    Hatcher, E., Gosnopedic, O.: Lucene in Action. Manning (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Graupmann, J., Biwer, M., Zimmer, C., Zimmer, P., Bender, M., Theobald, M., Weikum, G.: COMPASS: A Concept-based Web Search Engine for HTML, XML, and Deep Web Data. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 1313–1316 (2004), http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/graupmann04compass.html
  18. 18.
    The Global Education Learning Community: Curriki (2008), http://www.curriki.org/
  19. 19.
    Ministére de l’Éducation Nationale: Programmes des classes de troisieme des colleges. Bulletin Officiel de l’Education Nationale (10), 108 (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Intergeo Consortium: D2.1 internationalized ontology (2008), http://www.inter2geo.eu/en/deliverables
  21. 21.
    Qualifications and Curriculum Authority: National Curriculum Mathematics Keystage 3. Technical report, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2007), http://curriculum.qca.org.uk/subjects/mathematics/keystage3/
  22. 22.
    Gasevic, D., Hatala, M.: Ontology mappings to improve learning resource search. British Journal of Educational Technology 37(3), 375–389 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Association of Computer Machinery: ACM Classification (2008), http://www.acm.org/class/1998/
  24. 24.
    IEEE: ACM/IEEE Computer Society Computing Curricula (2008), http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final/
  25. 25.
    Van Asche, F.: Linking learning resources to curricula by using competencies. In: First International Workshop on Learning Object Discovery and Exchange, Crete (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stanford Medical Informatics: Protégé ontology editor version 3.3.1 (2007), http://protege.standford.edu
  27. 27.
    Kifer, M., Lausen, G., Wu, J.: Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. Journal of the ACM 42(4), 741–843 (1995)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
  29. 29.
    Racer Systems GmbH and Co. KG: Racerpro owl reasoner version 1.9.2 (2007), http://www.racer-systems.com/
  30. 30.
    HP Labs: Jena - a semantic web framework for java version 2.5.5 (2007), http://jena.sourceforge.net/
  31. 31.
    Parsia, C.: Pellet owl dl reasoner version 1.5.1 (2007), http://pellet.owldl.com/
  32. 32.
    Pepper, S., Moore, G.: Xml topic maps (xtm) 1.0 – topicmaps.org specification (2001), http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/
  33. 33.
    Dicheva, D.: Towards reusable and shareable courseware: Topic maps-based digital libraries (2005), http://compsci.wssu.edu/iis/nsdl/
  34. 34.
    Skaf-Molli, H., Molli, P., Marjanovic, O., Godart, C.: Libresource: Web based platform for supporting collaborative activities. In: 2nd IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: from Theory to Applications (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eurydice European Unit: Key data on education in Europe 2005, Eurydice European Unit (2005), http://www.eurydice.org/portal/page/portal/Eurydice/showPresentation?pubid=052EN
  36. 36.
    Google Inc.: Google Web Toolkit (GWT), a java to javascript compiler and toolkit (2008), http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
  37. 37.
    The Intergeo Consortium: D6.1 quality assessment plan (2008), http://www.inter2geo.eu/en/deliverables
  38. 38.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Libbrecht
    • 1
  • Cyrille Desmoulins
    • 2
  • Christian Mercat
    • 3
  • Colette Laborde
    • 2
  • Michael Dietrich
    • 1
  • Maxim Hendriks
    • 4
  1. 1.DFKI GmbHSaarbrückenGermany
  2. 2.LIGUniversité Joseph FourierGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.I3M, Université Montpellier 2France
  4. 4.Technische Universiteit EindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations