Advertisement

Improving the Performance of DCH Timing Adjustment in 3G Networks

  • Gaspar Pedreño
  • Juan J. Alcaraz
  • Fernando Cerdán
  • Joan García-Haro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4982)

Abstract

The main goal of Transport Channel Synchronization is that frames sent by the RNC arrive in time to the Nodes B for transmission over the air interface. The 3GPP specifies a simple Timing Adjustment algorithm that tracks the delay of the Iub link (interface defined between RNC and Node B) by adding or subtracting a constant step. We show that this scheme reacts too slowly under abrupt delay variations and may become unstable in high delay scenarios. This paper proposes an alternative mechanism denominated Proportional Tracking Algorithm (PTA) which ensures stability in any scenario and improves performance compared to the classic one. The stability analysis of PTA is based on control theory and the performance is measured by means of an UTRAN simulator considering realistic traffic conditions in the Iub.

Keywords

Data Frame Classic Algorithm Timing Adjustment Speech Source Frame Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    3GPP; Technical Specification Group RAN.: Synchronization in UTRAN Stage 2, 7.2.0. 3GPP TS 25.402 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    3GPP; Technical Specification Group RAN.: Iub/Iur Interface User Plane Protocol for DCH Data Streams, 7.3.0. 3GPP TS 25.427 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abraham, S., et al.: Effect of Timing Adjust Algorithms on Iub Link Capacity for Voice Traffic in W-CDMA Systems. In: Proc. IEEE VTC, vol. 1, pp. 311–315 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sagfors, M., et al.: Transmission Offset Adaptation in UTRAN. In: Proc. IEEE VTC, vol. 7, pp. 5240–5244 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogata, K.: Discrete Time Control Systems. Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    OMNeT++ Discrete Event Simulation System, http://www.omnetpp.org
  7. 7.
    3GPP; Technical Specification Group RAN.: IP Transport in UTRAN, 5.4.0. 3GPP TS 25.933 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bu, T., Chan, M.C., Ramjee, R.: Connectivity, Performance, and Resiliency of IP-Based CDMA Radio Access Networks. IEEE Trans. on Mobile Computing 5(8) (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    3GPP; Technical Specification Group RAN.: Delay Budget within the Access Stratum, 4.0.0, 3GPP TR 25.853 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaspar Pedreño
    • 1
  • Juan J. Alcaraz
    • 1
  • Fernando Cerdán
    • 1
  • Joan García-Haro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Technologies and ComunicationsPolytechnic University of Cartagena (UPCT)CartagenaSpain

Personalised recommendations