Advertisement

A Layered Ontology-Based Architecture for Integrating Geographic Information

  • Agustina Buccella
  • Domenico Gendarmi
  • Filippo Lanubile
  • Giovanni Semeraro
  • Alejandra Cechich
  • Attilio Colagrossi
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 134)

Abstract

Architectural solutions to information integration have extensively appeared during the last years, mostly from the federated system research field. Some of these solutions were created to deal with geographic information, whose inherent features make the integration process particularly complex. Among others, the use of ontologies has been proposed as a way of supporting an automated integration. However, how to specify and use a geographic ontology is not so clear in this context. In this paper, we introduce an ontology-based architectural solution as an extension of a federated system (Information Broker) built by the Italian Agency for Environmental Protection and Technical Services (APAT). Our extension is aimed at improving integration by adding semantic features through the use of ontologies and the ISO 19100 standards.

Keywords

Geographic Information Systems Federated Systems Ontology ISO 19100 Standards 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S., Zimányi, E.: Spatio-temporal conceptual models: data structures + space + time. In: Proceedings of the GIS 1999: 7th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems, pp. 26–33. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borges, K., Davis, C., Laender, A.: Omt-g: An object-oriented data model for geographic applications. Geoinformatica 5, 221–260 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(1), 1–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mark, D.M., Skupin, A., Smith, B.: Features, objects, and other things: Ontological distinctions in the geographic domain. In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 488–502. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Calefato, F., Colagrossi, A., Gendarmi, D., Lanubile, F., Semeraro, G.: An information broker for integrating heterogeneous hydrologic data sources: A web services approach. In: Xu, A.M., Chaudhry, L., Guarino, S.N. (eds.) Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Inf. Sys. IFIP Series, vol. 205, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gendarmi, D., Lanubile, F., Lichelli, O., Semeraro, G., Colagrossi, A.: Water protection information management by syntactic and semantic interoperability of heterogeneous repositories. In: Proceedings of the ISESS 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buccella, A., Cechich, A.: Towards integration of geographic information systems. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 168, 45–59 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buccella, A., Cechich, A., Brisaboa, N.R.: A three-level approach to ontology merging. In: Gelbukh, A., de Albornoz, Á., Terashima-Marín, H. (eds.) MICAI 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3789, pp. 80–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geographic information. Rules for Application Schema. Draft Int. Std. 19109, ISO/IEC (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geographic information. Geographic Information and Methodology for Feature Cataloguing. Draft International standard 19110, ISO/IEC (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geographic information. Spatial Schema. Int. Std. 19107, ISO/IEC (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Belussi, A., Negri, M., Pelagatti, G.: An iso tc 211 conformant approach to model spatial integrity constraints in the conceptual design of geographical databases. In: ER (Workshops), pp. 100–109 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jang, S., Kim, T.J.: Modeling an interoperable multimodal travel guide system using the iso 19100 series of international standards. In: Proceedings of the GIS 2006, pp. 115–122. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horrocks, I., Hayes, P., Patel-Schneider, P.: OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. Technical report (February (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haarslev, V., Moller, R.: Racer system description. In: Lambrix, P., Borgida, A., Lenzerini, M., Moller, R., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the CEUR-WS International Workshop on DL, vol. 22 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodríguez, M.A., Egenhofer, M.J.: Comparing geospatial entity classes: An asymmetric and context-dependent similarity measure. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18(3), 229–256 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Visser, U. (ed.): Intelligent Information Integration for the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3159. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hakimpour, F.: Using Ontologies to Resolve Semantic Heterogeneity for Integrating Spatial Database Schemata. PhD thesis, Zurich University (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fonseca, F.: Ontology-driven Geographic Information Systems. PhD thesis, University of Maine (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stoimenov, L., Stanimirovic, A., Djordjevic-Kajan, S.: Discovering mappings between ontologies in semantic integration process. In: Proceedings of the AGILE 2006, Visegrád, Hungary, pp. 213–219 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aerts, K., Maesen, K., van Rompaey, A.: A practical example of semantic interoperability of large-scale topographic databases using semantic web technologies. In: Proceedings of the AGILE 2006, Visegrád, Hungary, pp. 35–42 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janowicz, K.: Sim-dl: Towards a semantic similarity measurement theory for the description logic cnr in geographic information retrieval. In: OTM Workshops (2), pp. 1681–1692 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agustina Buccella
    • 1
  • Domenico Gendarmi
    • 2
  • Filippo Lanubile
    • 2
  • Giovanni Semeraro
    • 2
  • Alejandra Cechich
    • 1
  • Attilio Colagrossi
    • 3
  1. 1.GIISCO Research Group, Departamento de Ciencias de la ComputaciónUniversidad Nacional del ComahueNeuquenArgentina
  2. 2.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversity of BariBariItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento Tutela delle Acque Interne e MarineAPATRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations