Bertrand Competition in Networks

  • Shuchi Chawla
  • Tim Roughgarden
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4997)


We study price-of-anarchy type questions in two-sided markets with combinatorial consumers and limited supply sellers. Sellers own edges in a network and sell bandwidth at fixed prices subject to capacity constraints; consumers buy bandwidth between their sources and sinks so as to maximize their value from sending traffic minus the prices they pay to edges. We characterize the price of anarchy and price of stability in these “network pricing” games with respect to two objectives—the social value (social welfare) of the consumers, and the total profit obtained by all the sellers. In single-source single-sink networks we give tight bounds on these quantities based on the degree of competition, specifically the number of monopolistic edges, in the network. In multiple-source single-sink networks, we show that equilibria perform well only under additional assumptions on the network and demand structure.


Nash Equilibrium Capacity Constraint Demand Curve Pure Nash Equilibrium Bertrand Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A.: Competition and efficiency in congested markets. Mathematics of Operations Research 32(1), 1–31 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A.: Competition in parallel-serial networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, special issue on Non-cooperative Behavior in Networking 25(6), 1180–1192 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anshelevich, E., Shepherd, B., Wilfong, G.: Strategic network formation through peering and service agreements. In: Foundations of Computer Science (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chawla, S., Roughgarden, T.: Bertrand competition in networks,
  5. 5.
    Cole, R., Dodis, Y., Roughgarden, T.: Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users. In: Proc. 34th ACM Symp. Theory of Computing (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Estan, C., Akella, A., Banerjee, S.: Achieving good end-to-end service using bill-pay. In: HOTNETS-V (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleischer, L., Jain, K., Mahdian, M.: Tolls for heterogeneous selfish users in multicommodity networks and generalized congestion games. In: Proc. 45th IEEE Symp. Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 277–285 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gibbens, R.J., Kelly, F.P.: Resource pricing and the evolution of congestion control. Automatica 35(12), 1969–1985 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayrapetyan, A., Tardos, É., Wexler, T.: A network pricing game for selfish traffic. In: Proc. Symp. Principles of distributed Computing, pp. 284–291 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackie-Mason, J., Varian, H.: Pricing congestible network resources. IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. 13(7), 1141–1149 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mas-Colell, Whinston, Green: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Odlyzko, A.: Paris metro pricing for the internet. In: Proc. 1st ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, pp. 140–147 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ozdaglar, A., Srikant, R.: Incentives and pricing in communication networks. In: Algorithmic Game Theory, Cambridge Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roughgarden, T., Tardos, É.: Introduction to the inefficiency of equilibria. In: Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, É., Vazirani, V.V. (eds.) Algorithmic Game Theory, vol. 17, pp. 443–459. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spence, A.M.: Entry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics 8(2), 534–544 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srinivasan, K.: Multiple market entry, cost signalling and entry deterrence. Management Science 37(12), 1539–1555 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weintraub, G.Y., Johari, R., Van Roy, B.: Investment and market structure in industries with congestion. (Unpublished manuscript, 2007) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuchi Chawla
    • 1
  • Tim Roughgarden
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Sciences Dept.University of Wisconsin - MadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceStanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations