The Role of Propagule Pressure in Invasion Success
One of the core goals of invasion biology is the identification of factors that increase the risk of establishment success of non-native species. Historically, marine invasions have been investigated through observational studies and surveys (Cohen and Carlton 1998; Ruiz et al. 2000). These have guided ecologists towards the processes most relevant to invasion, but researchers are becoming increasingly aware of the limitations of observational studies alone. It is clear that different factors may influence invasion success at different stages of the invasion process (Kolar and Lodge 2001) and a major challenge is to quantify the relative importance of these factors. Understanding the intricacies of invasion dynamics requires a rigorous approach, in which potentially important factors can be controlled, manipulated and tested (Ruiz et al. 2000). Particularly strong calls have been made for the inclusion of propagule pressure or invader supply into our models, experiments and surveys, and this chapter reviews recent progress in elucidating the role of propagule pressure on invasion success in marine ecosystems.
KeywordsInvasion Success Round Goby Propagule Pressure Biotic Resistance Invasion Biology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cohen AN, Harris LH, Bingham BL, Carlton JT, Chapman JW, Lambert CC, Lambert G, Ljubenkov JC, Murray SN, Rao LC, Reardon K, Schwindt E (2005) Rapid assessment survey for exotic organisms in southern California bays and harbors, and abundance in port and non-port areas. Biol Invas 7:995–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coutts ADM, Taylor MD, Hewitt CL (2006) Novel method for assessing the en route survivorship of biofouling organisms on various vessel types Mar Pollut Bull 54:97–100Google Scholar
- Hayward BW, Stephenson AB, Morley M, Riley JL, Grenfell HR (1997) Faunal changes in Waitemata Harbour sediments, 1930s-1990s. J R Soc N Z 27:1–20Google Scholar
- Hewitt C, Campbell M, Thresher R, Martin R (1999) Marine biological invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Technical Report No 20, CSIRO Marine Research, Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, Hobart, Australia, p 344Google Scholar
- Johnston EL, Clark GF (2007) Recipient environment more important than community composition in determining the success of an experimental sponge transplant. Restor Ecol 15Google Scholar
- Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536Google Scholar
- Radziejewska T, Gruszka P, Rokicka-Praxmajer J (2006) A home away from home: a meiobenthic assemblage in a ship's ballast water tank sediment. Oceanologia 48:259–265Google Scholar
- Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (2003) Invasion vectors: a conceptual framework for management. In: Ruiz G, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 529–547Google Scholar
- Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2002) Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83:2575–2590Google Scholar
- Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92Google Scholar
- Underwood AJ, Keough MJ (2001) Supply-side ecology: the nature and consequences of variations in recruitment of intertidal organisms. In: Bertness M, Gaines S, Hay M (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Maine, pp 183–200Google Scholar