On Community-Oriented Internet Measurement

  • Mark Allman
  • Lann Martin
  • Michael Rabinovich
  • Kenneth Atchinson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4979)

Abstract

In this paper we describe a new measurement framework that researchers can use to abstract away some of the mundane logistic details that tend to dog every measurement project. The measurement community has outlined the need for better ways to gather assessments from a multitude of vantage points and our system is designed to be an open community-oriented response to this desire. While many previous efforts have approached this problem with heavyweight systems that ultimately fizzle due to logistical issues (e.g., hosts breaking and no money to replace them) we take the opposite approach and attempt to use the lightest possible weight framework that allows researchers to get their work done. In particular, we take the approach of designing a system without any sort of central “core” component and therefore the system has no single point of failure. In addition, our proposed system is community-oriented in that there is no central control and we build just enough mechanism for the community to get their work done and police the infrastructure. In addition, our proposed system works in an open fashion such that results from the community’s infrastructure are immediately provided to the community through publicly available “live feeds”.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    PREDICT: Protected Repository for the Defense of Infrastructure Against Cyber Threats, http://www.predict.org
  2. 2.
    CAIDA. Archipelago measurement infrastructure, http://www.caida.org/projects/ark/
  3. 3.
    CAIDA. Internet Measurement Data Catalog, http://www.datcat.org
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    claffy, k., Crovella, M., Friedman, T., Shannon, C., Spring, N.: Community-Oriented Network Measurement Infrastructure (CONMI) Workshop Report. ACM Computer Communication Review 36(2), 41–48 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M.J.: Surveyor: An infrastructure for internet performance measurements. In: INET 1999 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paxson, V., Mahdavi, J., Adams, A., Mathis, M.: An architecture for large-scale internet measurements. IEEE Communications 36(8), 48–54 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rabinovich, M., Triukose, S., Wen, Z., Wang, L.: Dipzoom: the internet measurements marketplace. In: 9th IEEE Global Internet Symp. (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rhea, S., Godfrey, B., Karp, B., Kubiatowicz, J., Ratnasamy, S., Shenker, S., Stoica, I., Yu, H.: OpenDHT: A Public DHT Service and Its Uses. In: SIGCOMM (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spring, N., Wetherall, D., Anderson, T.: Scriptroute: A public internet measurement facility. In: Usenix Symp. on Internet Technologies and Systems (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Allman
    • 1
  • Lann Martin
    • 2
  • Michael Rabinovich
    • 2
  • Kenneth Atchinson
    • 3
  1. 1.International Computer Science Institute 
  2. 2.Case Western Reserve University 
  3. 3.Baldwin-Wallace College 

Personalised recommendations