Advertisement

Abstract

Electronic institutions are software frameworks integrating normative environments where agents interact to create mutual commitments. Contracts are formalizations of business commitments among a group of agents, and comprise a set of applicable norms. An electronic institution acts as a trusted third-party that monitors contract compliance, by integrating in its normative environment the contractual norms, which are applicable to the set of contractual partners. In this paper we present and explore a contract model that facilitates contract establishment by taking advantage of an institutional normative background. Furthermore, the model is flexible enough to enable the expansion of the underlying normative framework, making it applicable to a wide range of contracting situations.

Keywords

Multiagent System Institutional Fact Normative Environment Normative Framework Default Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Environment engineering for multiagent systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18, 191–204 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Artikis, A., Pitt, J., Sergot, M.: Animated specifications of computational societies. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York 10036-5701, United States, Bologna, Italy, pp. 1053–1062 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Contracts as Legal Institutions in Organizations of Autonomous Agents. In: Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L., Tambe, M. (eds.) Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multi Agent Systems, pp. 948–955. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Engineering Social Order. In: Omicini, A., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1972, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craswell, R.: Contract Law: General Theories. In: Bouckaert, B., De Geest, G. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, pp. 1–24. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daskalopulu, A., Maibaum, T.: Towards Electronic Contract Performance. In: 12th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 771–777. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dignum, F., Broersen, J., Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J.: Meeting the deadline: Why, when and how. In: Hinchey, M.G., Rash, J.L., Truszkowski, W.F., Rouff, C.A. (eds.) FAABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3228, pp. 30–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J.C., Dignum, F., Weigand, H.: Formal Specification of Interaction in Agent Societies. In: Hinchey, M.G., Rash, J.L., Truszkowski, W.F., Rouff, C.A., Gordon-Spears, D.F. (eds.) FAABS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2699, pp. 37–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Colombetti, M.: Agent Communication and Institutional Reality. In: van Eijk, R.M., Huget, M.-P., Dignum, F.P.M. (eds.) AC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3396, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman-Hill, E.: Jess in Action, Manning Publications Co. (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    García-Camino, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C., Vasconcelos, W.: Norm-Oriented Programming of Electronic Institutions: A Rule-Based Approach. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4386, pp. 177–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power. Logic Journal of the IGPL 4, 427–443 (1996)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lopes Cardoso, H., Oliveira, E.: Electronic Institutions for B2B: Dynamic Normative Environments, Artificial Intelligence and Law (in press)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lopes Cardoso, H., Oliveira, E.: Virtual Enterprise Normative Framework within Electronic Institutions. In: Gleizes, M.-P., Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3451, pp. 14–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Searle, J.R.: The Construction of Social Reality. Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vázquez-Salceda, J., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F.: Implementing norms in multiagent systems. In: Lindemann, G., Denzinger, J., Timm, I.J., Unland, R. (eds.) MATES 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3187, pp. 313–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weyns, D., Omicini, A., Odell, J.: Environment as a first class abstraction in multiagent systems. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14, 5–30 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrique Lopes Cardoso
    • 1
  • Eugénio Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.LIACC – NIAD&R, Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations