Organisational Artifacts and Agents for Open Multi-Agent Organisations: “Giving the Power Back to the Agents”

  • Rosine Kitio
  • Olivier Boissier
  • Jomi Fred Hübner
  • Alessandro Ricci
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4870)

Abstract

The social and organisational aspects of agency have become nowadays a major focus of interest in the MAS community, and a good amount of theoretical work is available, in terms of formal models and theories. However, the conception and engineering of proper organisational infrastructures embodying such models and theories is still an open issue, in particular when open MAS are considered. Accordingly, in this paper we discuss a model for an organisational infrastructure called ORA4MAS that aims at addressing these issues. By being based on the A&A (Agents and Artifacts) meta-model, the key and novel aspect introduced with ORA4MAS is that organisations and the organisation infrastructure itself are conceived in terms of agents and artifacts, as first-class abstractions giving body to the MAS from design to runtime.

Keywords

Multi-agent Systems MAS organisations Open systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bellifemine, F.L., Caire, G., Greenwood, D.: Developing Multi-Agent Systems with JADE. Wiley, Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boissier, O., Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S.: Organization oriented programming from closed to open organizations. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 86–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., der van Torre, L.: The BOID architecture: conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In: Müller, J.P., Andre, E., Sen, S., Frasson, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal, Canada, pp. 9–16. ACM Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Deliberate normative agents: Principles and architecture. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dignum, V., Vazquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F.: OMNI: Introducing social structure, norms and ontologies into agent organizations. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah-Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) PROMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3346, pp. 181–198. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esteva, M., Rodriguez-Aguiar, J.A., Sierra, C., Garcia, P., Arcos, J.L.: On the formal specification of electronic institutions. In: Dignum, F., Sierra, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1191, pp. 126–147. Springer, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Esteva, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Rosell, B., AMELI, J.L.: An agent-based middleware for electronic institutions. In: Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L., Tambe, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 236–243. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agents systems. In: Demazeau, Y. (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), pp. 128–135. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    García-Camino, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J., Vasconcelos, W.W.: A distributed architecture for norm management in multi-agent systems. In: Sichman, J.S., et al. (eds.) COIN 2007 Workshops. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4870, pp. 171–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gasser, L.: Mas infrastructure: Definitions, needs and prospects. In: Revised Papers from the International Workshop on Infrastructure for Multi-Agent Systems, London, UK, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gâteau, B., Boissier, O., Khadraoui, D., Dubois, E.: Moiseinst: An organizational model for specifying rights and duties of autonomous agents. In: Third European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS 2005), Brussels, Belgium, December 7–8, pp. 484–485 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IST Advisory Group. Ambient intelligence: from vision to reality. Technical report, IST (2003), ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/istag-ist2003_consolidate_report.pdf
  13. 13.
    Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multiagent systems. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) SBIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2507, pp. 118–128. Springer, Berlin (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: \({\mathcal{S}}\mbox{-}{\mathcal{M}}{\sc OISE}^+\): A middleware for developing organised multi-agent systems. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J.A., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Sichman, J.S., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) ANIREM 2005 and OOOP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3913, pp. 64–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kitio, R.: Organizational artifacts and agents for open multi-agent systems, Master Thesis report (June, 2007), http://www.emse.fr/~boissier/kitio
  16. 16.
    Luck, M., et al.: Agent Technology: Computing as Interaction (A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing). AgentLink (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nardi, B.A.: Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okuyama, F.Y., Bordini, R.H., da Rocha Costa, A.C.: Spatially distributed normative objects. In: G. Boella, O. Boissier, E. Matson, J. Vázquez-Salceda (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems (COIN), held with ECAI 2006, Riva del Garda, Italy (August 28, 2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Omicini, A., Ossowski, S., Ricci, A.: Coordination infrastructures in the engineering of multiagent systems. In: Bergenti, F., Gleizes, M.-P., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems: The Agent-Oriented Software Engineering Handbook. Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations, vol. 11, pp. 273–296. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Omicini, A., Ricci, A., Viroli, M.: Agens Faber: Toward a theory of artefacts for MAS. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Sciences 150(3), 21–36 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Omicini, A., et al.: Coordination artifacts: Environment-based coordination for intelligent agents. In: AAMAS 2004, vol. 1, pp. 286–293. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ricci, A., Omicini, A., Denti, E.: Activity Theory as a framework for MAS coordination. In: Petta, P., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2577, pp. 96–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ricci, A., Viroli, M., Omicini, A.: A general purpose programming model & technology for developing working environments in MAS. In: Dastani, M., et al. (eds.) 5th International Workshop “Programming Multi-Agent Systems” (PROMAS 2007), AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 54–69 (May 15, 2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sairamesh, J., Lee, A., Anania, L.: Introduction. Commun. ACM 47(2), 28–31 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schmidt, K., Simone, C.: Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. International Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 5(2–3), 155–200 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Serrano, J.M., Ossowski, S.: A compositional framework for the specification of interaction protocols in multi-agent organizations. In: Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS), Brussels, Belgium, pp. 375–386 (December 7–8, 2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Susi, T., Ziemke, T.: Social cognition, artefacts, and stigmergy: A comparative analysis of theoretical frameworks for the understanding of artefact-mediated collaborative activity. Cognitive Systems Research 2(4), 273–290 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vázquez-Salceda, J., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F.: Norms in multiagent systems: Some implementation guidelines. In: Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems (EUMAS 2004) (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weyns, D., Van Dyke Parunak, H.: Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. Special Issue: Environment for Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 14(1). Springer, Netherlands (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weyns, D., Van Dyke Parunak, H., Michel, F. (eds.): E4MAS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3830, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosine Kitio
    • 1
  • Olivier Boissier
    • 1
  • Jomi Fred Hübner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alessandro Ricci
    • 3
  1. 1.SMA/G2I/ENSM.SESaint-EtienneFrance
  2. 2.GIA/DSC/FURBBlumenauBrazil
  3. 3.DEISALMA MATER STUDIORUM Università di BolognaCesena (FC)Italy

Personalised recommendations