A Model of Self-organized Criticality in Emergent Web Systems

  • Christian Russ
  • Mathias Lux
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 5)

Abstract

Self-organized criticality (SOC) is a measure to identify if complex systems have the potential to build out emergent behavior. This phenomenon is known in many different areas of physics, biology, ecology, economy and social systems. Its core assertion is that an over critical energy input can lead to spontaneous, self-enforcing and unpredictable self-organization. In such a process new structures and orders emerge. “Online Crowds” are masses of internet users who behave and act collectively on the web. They tend to follow specific online trends and can generate tremendous online traffic and attention (cp. Social software like YouTube.com, MySpace.com, Friendster.com, etc.). “Online Crowds” are observed rarely, are hard to predict and even harder to generate artificially. So it is essential for online business ideas to foster and facilitate these “Online Crowds” to reach a critical mass of online users to grow continuously and to produce profit. The paper in hand introduces the “Online Crowds” model (OCM) in context of web information systems employing the concepts of self organization theory and self organization criticality. Furthermore a statistical approach for detection of indicators of self organized criticality is presented along with experiments and preliminary results showing the applicability of the approach.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arthur, W.B.: Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banzhaf, W.: Overview of self-organzing systems in Science. In: Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, 14th edn., pp. 589–598. Academic Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bak, P., Tang, C., Wiesenfeld, K.: Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise. Physical Review Letters 59, 381–384 (1987)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barabási, A.L., Bonabeau, E.: Scale-free networks. Scientific American 288, 60–69 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beckenkamp, M.: The Herd Moves? MPI Collective Goods Preprint No. 14 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., Welch, I.: Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Information Cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3), 151–170 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonabeau, E.: The Perils of the Imitation Age. Harvard Business Review, 49–54 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bughin, J.R.: How the companies can make the most of user-generated content. The McKinsey Quarterly (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Celen, B., Kariv, S.: Observational learning under imperfect information. Games and Economic Behavior 47(1), 72–86 (2004)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colman, A.: A Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fuchs, C.: The Self-Organization of Virtual Communities. Journal of New Communications Research 1(1), 29–68 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gladwell, M.: The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Back Bay Books, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Golder, S.A., Huberman, B.A.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2), 198–208 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gross, R., Acquisti, A., Heinz, I.H.J.: Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In: ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society 2005, pp. 71–80. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heylighen, F.: The Science of Self-organization and Adaptivity. In: Kiel, L.D. (ed.) Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity, Eolss Publishers, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knowledge & Data Engineering Group, University of Kassel: Benchmark Folksonomy Data from BibSonomy. Kassel (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C.: Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. The American Economic Review 75(3), 424–440 (1985)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kurihara, S., Sugawara, T., Onai, R.: Self-organization based on nonlinear nonequilibrium. Dynamics of autonomous agents. Artificial Life and Robotics 2(3), 102–107 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ossimitz, G., Lapp, C.: Das Metanoia Prinzip — Eine Einführung in systemgerechtes Denken und Handeln. Franzbecker Verlag, Hildesheim (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2005), http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mika, P.: Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics. In: International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 522–536. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nielsen, J.: Participation Inequality: Encouraging More Users to Contribute. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.htmlGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Silent participants: Getting to know lurkers better. In: Fisher, D., Lueg, C. (eds.) From Usenet to Co Webs: Interacting with social information spaces, pp. 110–132. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pressley, L.: Using Social Software for Business Communication. Technical Report, Lauren Pressley (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prigogine, I.: Time, Structure and Fluctuations. Science 201(4358), 777–785 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rheingold, H.: Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Perseus Books, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Russ, C.: Online Crowds-Extraordinary mass behavior on the Internet. In: Tochtermann, K., Maurer, H. (eds.) Proceedings of i-Media 2007, Graz, pp. 65–76 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schelling, T.C.: Micromotives and Macrobehavior. W. W. Norton, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Watts, D.J.: The “New” Science of Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 30, 243–270 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Russ
    • 1
  • Mathias Lux
    • 1
  1. 1.Klagenfurt UniversityKlagenfurtAustria

Personalised recommendations