Advertisement

Collection of Biospecimen Resources for Cancer Research

Ethical Framework and Acceptance from the Patients’ Point of View
  • Johannes Huber
  • Esther Herpel
  • Frank Autschbach
  • Stephan Buse
  • Markus Hohenfellner
Conference paper
Part of the Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim book series (IMGB, volume 33)

Abstract

The collection of tissue samples has become a valuable basis for medical research. Relying on a deeply rooted tradition in cancer research, a common biobank project has been established in Heidelberg within the “National Center for Tumor Diseases” (NCT). As there is a lack of specific legal regulation in Germany, organisational requirements are uncertain. The use of a one-time general informed consent procedure containing both oral and written elements, attended by a physician, should guarantee the utmost legal security and respect for ethical considerations. The project is also mentioned in the hospital treatment contract. As the idea of ‘informed consent’ has become indispensable to medical ethics it is questionable whether, under well-defined circumstances, it might nevertheless be replaceable by regulatory means. Given the experience of the ‘NCT Tissue Bank’ that not a single patient refused to donate leftover tissue for subsequent use, a procedure based on contradiction might be regarded as more appropriate. In addition to ethical and legal considerations, the perspectives of those directly involved should be appreciated. We asked our patients, therefore, for their opinions as to whether the established informed consent procedure is satisfactory or in any way deficient.

Keywords

Informed Consent Procedure Legal Consideration Leftover Tissue Thoracic Disease Legal Harmonisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Barr M (2006) ’I’m not really read up on genetics’: biobanks and the social context of informed consent. BioSocieties 1: 251-262Google Scholar
  2. van Diest PJ (2002) No consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes. For. BMJ 325: 648-649Google Scholar
  3. Furness PN (2006) One-time general consent for research on biological samples: good idea, but will it happen? BMJ 332: 665Google Scholar
  4. Godard B, Schmidtke J, Cassiman JJ et al (2003) Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective. Eur J Hum Genet 11: 88-122Google Scholar
  5. Harris J (2005) Scientific research is a moral duty. J Med Ethics 31: 242-248Google Scholar
  6. Jack AL, Womack C (2003) Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research:review of records. BMJ 327: 262Google Scholar
  7. Malone T, Catalano PJ, O’Dwyer PJ et al. (2002) High rate of consent to bank biologic samples for future research: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 769-771Google Scholar
  8. Moutel G, de Montgolfier S, Meningaud JP et al (2001) Bio-libraries and DNA storage: assessment of patient perception of information. Med Law 20: 193-204Google Scholar
  9. Savulescu J (2002) No consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes. Against. BMJ 325: 649-651Google Scholar
  10. Start RD, Brown W, Bryant R et al (1996) Ownership and uses of human tissue: does the Nuffield bioethics report accord with opinion of surgical inpatients? BMJ 313: 1366-1368Google Scholar
  11. Taupitz J, Wicklein M (2007) Biobanken: Spannungsfeld zwischen Forschung und Persönlichkeitsschutz. BioFokus 74: 3-7Google Scholar
  12. Wendler D (2006) One-time general consent for research on biological samples. BMJ 332: 544-547Google Scholar
  13. Wheeler J, Agarwal M, Sugden J et al (2007) Experiences from the front-line routine consenting of surplus surgically removed tissue: without investment by the National Health Service fully informed consent for all is not available. J Clin Pathol 60: 351-354Google Scholar
  14. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67: 361-370Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Huber
    • 1
  • Esther Herpel
    • 2
  • Frank Autschbach
    • 3
  • Stephan Buse
    • 4
  • Markus Hohenfellner
    • 5
  1. 1.University Hospital for UrologyHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.National Centre for Tumor DiseasesHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Ruprecht-Karls-UniversityHeidelbergGermany
  4. 4.Department of UrologyRuprecht-Karls-UniversityHeidelbergGermany
  5. 5.Ruprecht-Karls-UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations