Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism

Chapter

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in hospitalised surgical and non-surgical patients. Thromboprophylaxis both mechanical and pharmacological has been clearly shown to decrease the incidence of both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The risk of developing VTE can be stratified according to the presence or absence of both individual patient and procedure-related factors. Widely accepted guidelines are available for risk stratification, and can be used to identify high risk patients requiring active prophylactic measures. The use of institutional strategies can improve compliance with protocols and leads to an increase in the proportion of patients receiving appropriate thromboprophylaxis.

The diagnosis and management of VTE will also be briefly discussed.

References

  1.  1.
    MacLellan, D.G., Fletcher, J.P.: Mechanical compression in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. ANZ J. Surg. 77, 418–423 (2007)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2.  2.
    Kakkos, S.K., Caprini, J.A., Geroulakos, G., et al.: Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism in high-risk patients (review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 8(4), CD005258 (2008)Google Scholar
  3.  3.
    McRae, S.J., Ginsberg, J.S.: In the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 19(1), 44–51 (2006)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4.  4.
    Australia and New Zealand Working Party on the Management and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Prevention of venous thromboembolism: best practice guidelines for Australia and New Zealand, 4th edn. Health Education and Management Innovations, Sydney (2007)Google Scholar
  5.  5.
    Geerts, W.H., Bergqvist, D., Pineo, G.F., et al.: Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edn.). Chest 133, 381–453 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6.  6.
    Cohen, A.T., Tapson, V.F., Bergmann, J.F., et al.: Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-­sectional study. Lancet 371(9610), 387–394 (2008)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7.  7.
    Tooher, R., Middleton, P., Pham, C., et al.: A systematic review of strategies to improve prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospitals. Ann. Surg. 241(3), 397–415 (2005)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8.  8.
    Wells, P.S., Anderson, D.R., Rodger, M., et al.: Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 349(13), 1227–1235 (2003)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryThe Queen Elizabeth HospitalWoodville SouthAustralia

Personalised recommendations