Advertisement

Separating Learning as an Aspect in Malaca Agents

  • M. Amor
  • L. Fuentes
  • J. A. Valenzuela
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4953)

Abstract

Current OO frameworks provided with MAS development toolkits provide core abstractions to implement the agent behavior, by using the typical OO specialisation mechanisms. However, these OO designs do not provide proper abstractions to modularize other extra-functional concerns (e.g. learning property), which are normally intermingled with the agent functionality (tangled code problem), and spread over different classes or components (crosscutting concerns problem). This means that the reusability of the agent architectural components is drastically reduced, so agents are difficult to maintain, extend or adapt. Aspect-oriented technologies overcome these problems by modeling such concerns as aspects. This work proposes to separate and modularize the learning of software agents following the aspect-oriented solution of the Malaca model. By decoupling the agent functional behavior from the protocol that carries out the learning activities; the development, adaptation and evolution of intelligent agents is substantially improved.

Keywords

Multiagent System Little Mean Square Software Agent Composition Rule Interaction Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alonso, E., et al.: Learning in Multi-Agent Systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 16(3), 277–284 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, New York (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amor, M., Fuentes, L., y Troya, J.M.: Training Compositional Agents in Negotiation Protocols Using Ontologies. J. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 11(2) (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amor, M., Pinto, M., Fuentes, M.L., y Troya, J.M.: Building Software Agents from Software Components. In: Conejo, R., Urretavizcaya, M., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.-L. (eds.) CAEPIA/TTIA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3040, pp. 222–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aspect-Oriented Software Development, http://www.aosd.net
  6. 6.
    Amor, M., Fuentes, L.: A Description Language for Component and Aspect-Oriented Agent Architectures, en Multiagent Systems and Software Architecture (MASSA 2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Java Agent DEvelopment Framework, http://jade.tilab.com/
  8. 8.
    Clancey, W.: Conceptual Coordination: How the Mind Orders Experience in Time. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcia, A., et al.: The Learning Aspect Pattern. In: Proceedings of Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP 2004), Illinios, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia, A., Lucena, C.: Taming Heterogeneous Agent Architectures with Aspects. Communications of the ACM, July 2006 (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gamma, E., et al.: Design Patterns Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley editors, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sant’Anna, et al.: On the Quantitative Assessment of Modular Multi-Agent System Architectures. NetObjectDays (MASSA) (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sant’Anna, C., et al.: General Architecture Evaluation Process/ Metrics. AOSD-Europe Deliverable D85, AOSD-Europe-ULANC-25 (June 2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Amor
    • 1
  • L. Fuentes
    • 1
  • J. A. Valenzuela
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpto. Lenguajes y Ciencias de la ComputaciónUniversidad de MálagaMálaga 

Personalised recommendations