Foundations of Refinement Operators for Description Logics

  • Jens Lehmann
  • Pascal Hitzler
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4894)

Abstract

In order to leverage techniques from Inductive Logic Programming for the learning in description logics (DLs), which are the foundation of ontology languages in the Semantic Web, it is important to acquire a thorough understanding of the theoretical potential and limitations of using refinement operators within the description logic paradigm. In this paper, we present a comprehensive study which analyses desirable properties such operators should have. In particular, we show that ideal refinement operators in general do not exist, which is indicative of the hardness inherent in learning in DLs. We also show which combinations of desirable properties are theoretically possible, thus providing an important step towards the definition of practically applicable operators.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Badea, L., Stanciu, M.: Refinement operators can be (weakly) perfect. In: Džeroski, S., Flach, P.A. (eds.) ILP 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1634, pp. 21–32. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Badea, L.: Perfect refinement operators can be flexible. In: Horn, W. (ed.) Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 2000, pp. 266–270. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Badea, L., Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H.: A refinement operator for description logics. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A.M. (eds.) ILP 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1866, pp. 40–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, W.W., Hirsh, H.: Learning the classic description logic: Theoretical and experimental results. In: Doyle, P.T.J., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Bonn, FRG, May 1994, pp. 121–133. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esposito, F., Fanizzi, N., Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Semeraro, G.: Knowledge-intensive induction of terminologies from metadata. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 441–455. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fanizzi, N., Ferilli, S., Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Semeraro, G.: Downward refinement in the ALN description logic. In: 4th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2004), Kitakyushu, Japan, December 2004, pp. 68–73. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fanizzi, N., Ferilli, S., Di Mauro, N., Basile, T.M.A.: Spaces of theories with ideal refinement operators. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.) IJCAI 2003, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, August 9-15, 2003, pp. 527–532. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iannone, L., Palmisano, I.: An algorithm based on counterfactuals for concept learning in the semantic web. In: Ali, M., Esposito, F. (eds.) Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Bari, Italy, June 2005, pp. 370–379 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kietz, J.-U., Morik, K.: A polynomial approach to the constructive induction of structural knowledge. Machine Learning 14, 193–217 (1994)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehmann, J.: Hybrid learning of ontology classes. In: Perner, P. (ed.) MLDM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4571, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: Foundations of refinement operators for description logics. In: Technical report. University of Leipzig (2007), http://www.jens-lehmann.org
  13. 13.
    Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: Foundations of refinement operators for description logics. In: Blockeel, H., Ramon, J., Shavlik, J., Tadepalli, P. (eds.) ILP 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4894, pp. 161–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lisi, F.A., Malerba, D.: Ideal refinement of descriptions in AL-log. In: Horváth, T., Yamamoto, A. (eds.) ILP 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2835, pp. 215–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, New York (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H., Van Laer, W., Ramon, J., De Raedt, L.: Generalizing refinement operators to learn prenex conjunctive normal forms. In: Džeroski, S., Flach, P.A. (eds.) ILP 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1634, pp. 245–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nienhuys-Cheng, S.H., van der Laag, P.R.J., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Constructing refinement operators by decomposing logical implication. In: Torasso, P. (ed.) AI*IA 1993. LNCS, vol. 728, pp. 178–189. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H., de Wolf, R. (eds.): Foundations of Inductive Logic Programming. LNCS, vol. 1228. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shapiro, E.Y.: Inductive inference of theories from facts. In: Lassez, J.L., Plotkin, G.D. (eds.) Computational Logic: Essays in Honor of Alan Robinson, pp. 199–255. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    van der Laag, P.R.J., Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H.: Existence and nonexistence of complete refinement operators. In: Bergadano, F., De Raedt, L. (eds.) ECML 1994. LNCS, vol. 784, pp. 307–322. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens Lehmann
    • 1
  • Pascal Hitzler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.AIFB InstituteUniversität Karlsruhe (TH)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations