Advertisement

An Order Based Memetic Evolutionary Algorithm for Set Partitioning Problems

  • Christine L. Mumford
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 115)

Metaheuristic algorithms, such as simulated annealing, tabu search and evolutionary algorithms, are popular techniques for solving optimization problems when exact methods are not practical. For example, the run times required to obtain exact solutions to many common combinatorial problems grow exponentially (or worse) with the problem size, and as a result, solving even a relatively modest sized problem of this type may require many centuries of computation time, even on the fastest computer of the day. Such problems are known collectively as NP-Hard, and include the travelling salesman problem (TSP), which is probably the best known problem in the class. The present study will concentrate on a type of NP-Hard combinatorial problem known as the set partitioning problem. If we have n objects to partition into m sets, in such a way that each object must be assigned to exactly one set, it follows that there are m n different ways that the n objects can be assigned to the m sets, for a straightforward unconstrained problem. It is instructive to note that every time the problem size of the set partitioning problem is increased by one object, the corresponding run time for an exhaustive search algorithm will increase by a factor of m, and thus the run time grows exponentially as the number of objects – n – increases. While it is true that much better exact methods than exhaustive search have been developed for most NP-Hard problems, the ‘growth factor’ remains exponential for the run time, and no one in history has so far managed to change that.

Keywords

Local Search Crossover Operator Graph Coloring Timetabling Problem Graph Coloring Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson PG, Ashlock D (2004) Advances in ordered greed. (available online at http://www.cs.rit.edu/∼pga/abstracts.php - last accessed: 28 February 2007)
  2. 2.
    Brélaz D 1979 New methods to color the vertices of graphs. Communications ACM, 24(4): 251-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burke E, Newell J(1999) A multi-stage evolutionary algorithm for the timetabling problem. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 3(1): 63-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke E, Petrovic S 2002 Recent research directions in automated timetabling. European J. Operational Research, 140(2): 266-280.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caramia M, Dell’Olmo P, Italiano G (2000) New algorithms for examination timetabling. In: Proc. 4th Intl. Workshop Algorithm Engineering,5-8 September, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1982, Springer, London, UK: 230-240.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carter MW, Laporte G, Lee SY 1996 Examination timetabling: algorithms, strategies and applications. European J. Operational Research, 47: 373-383.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coffman EG, Garey MR, Johnson DS 1984 Approximation algorithms for bin packing - an updated survey. In: Ausiello G, Lucertini M, Serafini P (eds) Algorithm Design for Computer System Design: Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 49-106.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Croitoru C, Luchian H, Gheorghies O, Apetrei A (2002) A new genetic graph coloring heuristic. In: Proc. Computational Symp. Graph Coloring and its Generalizations, Ithaca, NY: 63-74.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Culberson J, Luo F 1996 Exploring the k-colorable landscape with iterated greedy. In: Johnson DS, Trick MA (eds) (1996) DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 26. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI: 499-520.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis L (1985) Applying adaptive algorithms to epistatic domains. In: Proc. Intl. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, CA: 162-164Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis L (1991) Order based genetic algorithms and the graph coloring problem. In: Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY: 72-90.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1996) The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans. System Man Cybernetics - Part B, (26): 29-41.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eiben A, der Hauw JV, Hemert JV 1998 Graph coloring with adaptive evolutionary algorithms. J. Heuristics, 4: 25-46.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erben W (2001) A grouping genetic algorithm for graph colouring and exam timetabling. In: Practice and Theory of Auttomated Timetabling- Proc. PATAT2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2079, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 132-156.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Falkenauer E 1995 Solving equal piles with the grouping genetic algorithm. In: Eshelman LJ (ed) Proc. 6th Intl. Conf. Genetic Algorithms - ICGA, 15-19 July, San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann: 492-497.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Falkerauer E 1996 A hybrid grouping genetic algorithm for bin packing. J. Heuristics, 2: 5-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fogel L, Owens A, Walsh M 1966 Artificial Intelligence Through Simulated Evolution. Wiley, New York, NY.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Galinier P, Hao JK 1999 Hybrid evolutionary algorithms for graph coloring. J. Combinatorial Optimization, 3(4): 379-397.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldberg DE 1989 Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldberg DE, Lingle R (1985) Alleles, loci and the traveling salesman problem. In: Proc. Intl. Conf. Genetic Algorithms and their Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ: 154-159.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greenwood GW, Tyrrell AM 2006 Introduction to Evolvable Hardware: a Practical Guide for Designing Self-Adaptive Systems. Wiley-IEEE Press, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holland JH 1975 Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hurley S, Smith D, Thiel S 1997 Fasoft: a system for discrete channel frequency assignment. Radio Science, 32(5): 1921-1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson DS, Trick MA (eds) (1996) DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathemat-ics and Theoretical Computer Science 26. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones D, Beltramo M 1991 Solving partitioning problems with genetic algo-rithms. In: Belew RK, Booker LB (eds) Proc. 4th Intl. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, July, San Diego, CA, Morgan Kaufmann: 442-449.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Neural Networks, IEEE Computer Society Press, Piscataway, NJ: 1942-1948.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C, Vecchi M 1983 Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598): 671-680.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Langton C (ed) (1995) Artificial Life: an Overview. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lewis R, Paechter B 2005 Application of the grouping genetic algorithm to university course timetabling. In: Raidl GR, Gottlieb J (eds) Evolutionary Com-putation in Combinatorial Optimization (Proc. 5th European Conf. - EvoCOP 2005), 30 March - 1 April, Lausanne, Switzerland. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3448, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 144-153.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martello S, Toth P (1990) Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implementations. Wiley, Chichester, UK.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matula D, Marble G, Isaacson J 1972 Graph coloring algorithms. In: Read R (ed) Graph Theory and Computing, Academic Press, New York, NY: 104-122.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Michalewicz Z 1996 Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolutionary Programs 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, London, UK.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mitchell M(1996) An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mumford C 2006 New order based crossovers for the graph coloring prob-lem. In: Runarsson TP, Beyer H-G, Burke EK, Guervós JJM, Whitley LD, Yao X (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from nature (Proc. 9th Intl. Conf. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature Conf. - PPSN IX), 9-13 September, Reykjavik, Iceland. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4193, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 880-889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Oliver IM, Smith DJ, Holland JH (1987) A study of permutation crossover operators on the traveling salesman problem. In: Grefenstette JJ (ed) Genetic Algorithms and their Applications (Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. Genetic Algorithms), July, Cambridge, MA, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ: 224-230.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pankratzl G 2005 A grouping genetic algorithm for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows. OR Spectrum, 27(1): 21-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rechenberg I (1965) Cybernetic solution path of an experimental problem. Technical Report 1122, Ministry of Aviation, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, Hants, UK, August.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rekiek B, Lit PD, Pellichero F, Falkenauer E, Delchambre A (1999) Applying the equal piles problem to balance assembly lines. In: Proc. 1999 IEEE Intl. Symp. Assembly and Task Planning - ISATP’99, Portugal, IEEE Computer Society Press, Piscataway, NJ: 399-404.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ross P, Hart E, Corne D (1998) Some observations about ga-based exam timetabling. In: Selected Papers from Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling II - PATAT 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1408, Springer-Verlag, London, UK: 115-129.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schaerf A 1999 A survey of automated timetabling. Artificial Intelligence Review, 13: 87-127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schwerin P, Wäscher G 1997 The bin-packing problem: a problem genera-tor and some numerical experiments with ffd packing and mtp. Intl. Trans. Operational Research, 4(5-6): 377-389.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Valenzuela CL 2001 A study of permutation operators for minimum span frequency assignment using an order based representation. J. Heuristics, 7(1): 5-22. (CL Valenzuela is now known as CL Mumford).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Welsh D, Powell M 1967 An upper bound for the chromatic number of a graph and its application to timetabling problems. The Computer Journal, 10: 85-86.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine L. Mumford
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations