Compliance Aware Business Process Design

  • Ruopeng Lu
  • Shazia Sadiq
  • Guido Governatori
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4928)

Abstract

Historically, business process design has been driven by business objectives, specifically process improvement. However this cannot come at the price of control objectives which stem from various legislative, standard and business partnership sources. Ensuring the compliance to regulations and industrial standards is an increasingly important issue in the design of business processes. In this paper, we advocate that control objectives should be addressed at an early stage, i.e., design time, so as to minimize the problems of runtime compliance checking and consequent violations and penalties. To this aim, we propose supporting mechanisms for business process designers. This paper specifically presents a support method which allows the process designer to quantitatively measure the compliance degree of a given process model against a set of control objectives. This will allow process designers to comparatively assess the compliance degree of their design as well as be better informed on the cost of non-compliance.

Keywords

Business Process Design Process Compliance Control Business Process Modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    zur Muehlen, M., Ho, D.T.: Risk Management in the BPM Lifecycle. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 454–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christopher, G., Müller, S., Pfitzmann, B.: From Regulatory Policies to Event Monitoring Rules: Towards Model-Driven Compliance Automation. IBM Research Report RZ 3662, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goedertier, S., Vanthienen, J.: Designing Compliant Business Processes with Obligations and Permission. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 5–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Governatori, G.: Representing Business Contracts in RuleML. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 14(2–3), 181–216 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Governatori, G., Milosevic, Z.: A Formal Analysis of a Business Contract Language. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 15(4), 659–685 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Governatori, G., Milosevic, Z., Sadiq, S.: Compliance checking between business processes and business contracts. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hagerty, J.: SOX Spending for 2006. AMR Research, Boston USA (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu, R., Sadiq, S.: Managing Process Variants as an Information Resource. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., Naimiri, K.: Modeling Control Objectives for Business Process Compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zdravkovic, J., Kabilan, V.: Enabling Business Process Interoperability Using Contract Workflow Models. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 77–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruopeng Lu
    • 1
  • Shazia Sadiq
    • 1
  • Guido Governatori
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information Technology and Electrical EngineeringThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations