Trade-Offs in the Performance of Workflows – Quantifying the Impact of Best Practices
Business process redesign is one of the most powerful ways to boost business performance and to improve customer satisfaction . A possible approach to business process redesign is using redesign best practices. A previous study identified a set of 29 different redesign best practices . However, little is known about the exact impact of these redesign best practices on workflow performance.
This study proposes an approach that can be used to quantify the impact of a business process redesign project on all dimensions of workflow performance. The approach consists of a large set of performance measures and a simulation toolkit. It supports the quantification of the impact of the implementation of redesign best practices, in order to determine what best practice or combination of best practices leads to the most favorable effect in a specific business process.
The approach is developed based on a quantification project for the parallel best practice  and is validated with two other quantification projects, namely for the knockout and triage best practices.
KeywordsBusiness Process Redesign Business Process Simulation Best Practices Performance Measurement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Adams, C., Neely, A.: Prism Reform. Financial Management 5, 28–31 (2002)Google Scholar
- 3.Brand, N., van der Kolk, H.: Workflow Analysis and Design. Kluwer Bedrijfswetenschappen (in Dutch) (1995)Google Scholar
- 4.Brignall, T.J., Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Silvestro, R.: Performance Measurement in Service Businesses. Management Accounting 69(10), 34–36 (1991)Google Scholar
- 6.Goverde, R.H.J.J.M., Reijers, H.A.: Resource Management: a Clear-Headed Approach to Ensure Efficiency. Workflow Magazine 4(6), 26–28 (1998)Google Scholar
- 8.Jansen-Vullers, M.H., Kleingeld, P.A.M., Loosschilder, M.W.N.C., Netjes, M.: Sequential or in Parallel – Measuring the impact of a Business Process Redesign Best Practice (submitted for publication, 2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review 70, 71–79 (1992)Google Scholar
- 10.Keegan, D.P., Eiler, R.G., Jones, C.R.: Are your Performance Measures obsolete? Management Accounting 70(12), 45–50 (1989)Google Scholar
- 12.Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D.: Simulation Modeling and Analysis, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Singapore (2000)Google Scholar
- 13.Loosschilder, M.W.N.C., Jansen-Vullers, M.H.: Quantification of the implementation of the parallel, knockout and triage heuristic, BETA Working papers 203, 204 and 205, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands (2007)Google Scholar
- 15.Mehta, A.: Smart modeling: Basic methodology and advanced tools. In: Joines, J.A., Barton, R.R., Kang, K., Fishwick, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the winter simulation conference, pp. 241–245 (2000)Google Scholar
- 17.Netjes, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A.: Analysis of Resource Constrained Processes with Colored Petri Nets. In: Jensen, K. (ed.) Proc. of the 6th Workshop on Practical Use of Coloured Petri Nets and the CPN Tools (2005)Google Scholar