Multiparadigm Programming in Object-Oriented Languages: Current Research

Report on the Workshop MPOOL’07 at ECOOP 2007
  • Kei Davis
  • Jörg Striegnitz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4906)

Abstract

While OO has become ubiquitously employed for design, implementation, and even conceptualization, many practitioners recognize the concomitant need for other programming paradigms according to problem domain. Nevertheless, the choice of a programming paradigm is strongly influenced by the supporting programming language facilities. In turn, choice of programming language is usually highly constrained by practical considerations. We seek answers to the question of how to address the need for other programming paradigms, or even domain specific languages, in the general context of OO languages.

It is clear that this field is yet nascent: novel, disparate approaches and techniques are still being discovered or invented, and this very novelty adds a significant element of intellectual entertainment. This article describes the cross section of research efforts reported at the workshop on Multiparadigm Programming in Object-Oriented Languages held at the 2007 European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming.

Keywords

Object-oriented multiparadigm programming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrahams, D., Gurtovoy, A.: C++ template metaprogramming, Concepts, Tools, and Techniques from Boost and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexandrescu, A.: Modern C++ Design: Generic Programming and Design Patterns Applied. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ANSI/ISO C++ Committee. Programming Languages—C++ ISO/IEC 14882:1998(E). American National Standards Institute (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boost Metaprogramming library, http://www.boost.org/libs/mpl/doc/index.html
  5. 5.
    Brus, T.H., et al.: CLEAN: A language for functional graph rewriting. In: Kahn, G. (ed.) FPCA 1987. LNCS, vol. 274, pp. 364–384. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Czarnecki, K., et al.: Generative Programmind and Active Libraries. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karlsson, B.: Beyond the C++ Standard Library, A Introduction to Boost. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McNamara, B., Smaragdakis, Y.: Functional programming in C++. Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pp. 118–129 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Veldhuizen, T.: Expression Templates. C++ Report 7(5), 26–31 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kei Davis
    • 1
  • Jörg Striegnitz
    • 2
  1. 1.Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA
  2. 2.University Of Applied Sciences RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations