Advertisement

The Marriage of Rousseau and Blended Learning: An Investigation of 3 Higher Educational Institutions’ Praxis

  • Esyin Chew
  • Norah Jones
  • David Turner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4823)

Abstract

This paper sets out the central problem of current blended learning research that it does not have an appropriate focus on educational theory. The paper explains how the blended learning praxis in higher education can be understood in terms of Rousseau’s educational theory. The research methods for collecting qualitative data from 28 academics in 3 universities are explained concisely. The analysis and discussion of institutional practices are used to identify best practice for blended learning. The role of the educator and student on holistic learning are examined. Overall, the authors urge that the focal point of blended learning research should not merely focus on the innovative technology and instructional design issues; educational theories remain the fundamental foundation for any educationalist as well as for any educational technologist.

Keywords

Blended learning educational theory educational technology higher education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adelman, C., Kemimis, S., Jenkins, D.: Rethinking Case Study: Notes from the Second Cambridge Conference. In: H. (ed.) Towards a Science of The Singular, Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia, pp. 45–61 (1980)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, G.: Fundamentals of educational Research, 2nd edn. RoutlegeFalmer London (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aspy, D.N., Aspy, C.B.: Toward Effective Advocacy for Humanistic Values. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development 37(2), 85–95 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bailey, G., Pownell, D.: Tecnology Staff-Development and Support Programs: Applying Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Learning and Leading with Technology 26(3), 48–64 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barker, T.: Computer Adaptive Assessment and Its Use in the Development of a Student Model for Blended Learning, Blended Learning – Promoting Dialogue in Innovation and Practice, University of Hertfordshire. In: First Annual Blended Learning Conference. Learning in Higher Education and Workplace Learning Settings’ Hatfield (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyle, T.: A Dynamic, Systematic Method for Developing Blended Learning, Education. Communication and Information 5(3), 221–232 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chew, E., Jones, N.: Generic Model of Computation for Intelligent Computer-aided Assessment Progress (iCAP). In: Chew, E., Jones, N. (eds.) University of Loughborough: Tenth International Computer Assisted Assessment (CAA) Conference, Loughborough, pp. 107–124 (July4-5, 2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cortazzi, M., Hall, B.: Vygotsky and learning. Education Libraries Journal 42, 17–21 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Croft, R.S.: What Is a Computer in the Classroom? A Deweyan Philosophy. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 22, 301 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cubberley, E.P.: The History Of Education, Blackmask Online (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dewey, J.: Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. The Macmillan Company, New York (1922)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ehrlich, T.: Reinventing John Dewey’s Pedagogy as a University Discipline. The Elementary School Journal, ProQuest Psychology Journals 98, 489 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    James, J.D.: Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In: James, F., Bradley, D. (eds.) The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (2006), http://www.iep.utm.edu/[Accessed: 3.3.2007]
  14. 14.
    Jennifer, A.J.S., Monfries, M.: Motivation to Learn in University Students: Links with Vygotsky’s Assisted Discovery. In: European Conference on Educational Research. Bath (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnston, I.: Introduction to the Eighteenth Century and Rousseau’s Emile. Media Relations & Publications Department, Malaspina University-College (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson, J., Tang, M.: Integration of e-Management, e-Development and e-Learning Technologies for Blended Course delivery. AACE Journal 13(2), 185–199 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones, N.: Chapter 13: E-College Wales, A Case Study of Blended Learning. In: Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R. (eds.) Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, CA (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loveless, A.M.: Where do You Stand to Get a Good View of Pedagogy? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 8(4), 337–349 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matthews, M.: Knowledge, Action and Power. In: MACKIE, R. (ed.) Literacy and Revolution: the Pedagogy of Paulo Freire, Pluto Press, London (1980)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newman, I., Benz, C.R.: Qualitative-Quantitative Research Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Southern Illinois University Press, IL (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Otte, G.: Using Blended Learning to Drive Faculty Development (And Vice Versa). Sloan-C Series 6, 71–84 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ross, B., Gage, K.: Global Perspective on Blended Learning: Insight from WebCT and Our Customers in higher Education. In: Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R. (eds.) Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, CA (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rousseau, J.-J.: Emile. The Project Gutenberg EBook (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salmon, G., Lawless, N.: Chapter 28: Management Education for the Twenty-First Century. In: Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R. (eds.) Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, CA (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simpson, D.J.: John Dewey’s Concept of the Student. Canadian Journal of Education 26 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thorne, K.: Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online & Traditional Learning, Kogan Page London, p. 18 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Whitelock, D.: Blended Learning: Forget the Name But What About The Claims? In: Whitelock, D., Mason, R. (eds.) Bledned Learning. Special Issue of Education, Communication and Information (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esyin Chew
    • 1
  • Norah Jones
    • 1
  • David Turner
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) 
  2. 2.Education Department at Faculty of Humanities and Social ScienceUniversity of GlamorganUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations