What We Are Talking about and What We Are Saying about It

  • Eva Hajičová
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4919)

Abstract

In view of the relationships between theoretical, computational and corpus linguistics, their mutual contributions are discussed and illustrated on the issue of the aspect of language related to the information structure of the sentence, distinguishing ”what we are talking about” and ”what we are saying about it”.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Uszkoreit, H.: New Chances for Deep Linguistic Processing. In: Huang, C.R. (ed.) Frontiers in Computational Linguistics, Shangwu Press Beijing (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hajič, J.: Building a Syntactically Annotated Corpus: The Prague Dependency Treebank. In: Hajičová, E. (ed.) Issues of Valency and Meaning. Studies in Honour of Jarmila Panevová, pp. 106–132. Karolinum, Charles University Press, Prague, Czech Republic (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sgall, P.: Zur Frage der Ebenen im Sprachsystem. In: Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1, pp. 95–106 (1964)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sgall, P.: Generative bschreibung und die ebenen des sprachsystems. Zeichen und System der Sprache III, 225–239 (1966)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sgall, P.: Generativní popis jazyka a česká deklinace. Academia, Prague (1967)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., Panevová, J.: The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Reidel Publishing Company, Academia and Dordrecht, Prague (1986)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hajičová, E., Partee, B.H., Sgall, P.: Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures, and semantic content. Kluwer, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strawson, P.P.: Introduction to Logical Theory. Methuen, London (1952)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strawson, P.P.: Identifying Reference and Truth Values. Theoria, 96–118 (1964)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hajičová, E.: On presupposition and allegation. In: Partee, B.H., Sgall, P. (eds.) Discourse and Meaning, pp. 99–122. John Benjamins Publ. House, Amsterdam (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Partee, B.H.: Allegation and Local Accommodation, pp. 65–86 (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chomsky, N.: Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague (1957)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lakoff, G.: On Generative Semantics, pp. 232–296 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sgall, P.: Functional Sentence Perspective in a Generative Description of Language. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 203–225 (1967)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rooth, M.: Association with Focus. PhD thesis, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst (1985)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Halliday, M.A.K.: Intonation and Grammar in British English. Mouton, The Hague (1967)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuno, S.: Functional sentence perspective. Linguistic Inquiry, 296–320 (1972)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bartels, C.: Acoustic correlates of second occurrence focus: Towards and experimental investigation. In: Kamp, H., Partee, B.H. (eds.), pp. 11–30 (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beaver, D., Clark, Z.B., Flemming, E.: T.Jaeger, F., Wolters, M.: When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second-occurrence focus. Language, 245–276 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hajiéová, E., Sgall, P.: Degrees of Contrast and the Topic-Focus Articulation. In: Steube, A. (ed.) Information Structure - Theoretical and Empirical Aspects, pp. 1–13. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Veselá, K., Peterek, N., Hajiéová, E.: Topic-Focus Articulation in PDT: Prosodic Characteristics of Contrastive Topic. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 5–22 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Firbas, J.: Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaby, S.: The use of italics as stylistic devices marking information focus in Englihs translation. In: Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, Birmingham, p. 55 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuno, S.: The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, Mass (1973)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fazuo, F.: A consideration of the thematiser ’wa’ (in Japanese), pp. 147–160 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Novák, P.: Remarks on devices of functional sentence perspective. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, pp. 175–178. Academia, Prague (1974)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dahl, O.: Topic and comment: a study in Russian and general transformational grammar. Slavica Gothoburgensia 4, Göteborg (1969)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krejnovič, E.A.: Jukagirskij jazyk. Leningrad, Moscow (1958)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bowen, D.: Beginning Tagalog. Berkeley and Los Angeles (1965)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sgall, P.: Towards a Definition of Focus and Topic. The Prague Studies of Mathematical Linguistics, 173–198 (1981)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chomsky, N.: Deep Structure, Surface Structure and Semantic Interpretation, pp. 193–216 (1971)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schmerling, S.: Aspects of English Sentence Stress. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas (1971)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Selkirk, E.: Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Selkirk, E.: Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing. In: Goldsmith, A. (ed.) Handbook of Phonological Theory, pp. 550–569. Blackwell, London (1995)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hajièová, E., Sgall, P.: Topic and Focus in Transformational Grammar. Papers in Linguistics, 3–58 (1975)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Steedman, M.: Structure and Intonation. Language, 260–296 (1991)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Steedman, M.: Surface Structure and Interpretation. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Steedman, M.: Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 649–689 (2000)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sgall, P., et al.: Experimental Research on Systemic Ordering. Theoretical Linguistics, 97–239 (1995)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zikánová, v.: What Do the Data in PDT Say about Systemic Ordering in Czech? The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 39–46 (2006)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cuřín, J., et al.: The Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank 1.0 CD-ROM (2004) CAT: LDC2004T25, Linguistic Data Consortium (2004)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dušková, L.: Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Academia, Prague (1988)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cinková, S., et al.: The tectogrammatics of English: on some problematic issues from the viewpoint of Prague Dependency Treebank (in preparation)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Hajičová
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Formal and Applied LinguisticsCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations