On the Roles and Rationales of European STI-Policies

  • Rahel Falk
  • Werner Hölzl
  • Hannes Leo


EU enlargement has increased the economic diversity of the European Union substantially, also with respect to capacities in the fields of science, technology and innovation (STI). The increasing disparities have (re)kindled (old) debates on the role and scope of EU policy intervention. The conflicts of interest revolve mainly around the size of the budget, but also on the composition of funding and - within the single chapters of funding- around the content of programmes. In a nutshell, the net paying Member States aim to limit the redistributive role of EU funds and strive for more excellence in European STI performance. The net recipient countries in turn insist on Article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union which states that cohesion is one of the core objectives of the European Union.


Innovation Policy Policy Field Policy Learning Mutual Cooperation Cohesion Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alesina A, Angeloni I, Schuknecht L (2005) What does the European Union do? Public Choice 123: 275–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banchoff T (2002) Institutions, inertia and European Union research policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 1–21Google Scholar
  3. Borras S (2003) The Innovation Policy of the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  4. Breuss F, Eller M (2004) Efficiency and Federalism in the European Union: The optimal assignment of policy tasks to different levels of government. Constitutional Political Economy 15: 27–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casella A (2005) Redistribution policy: a European Model. Journal of Public Economics 89: 1305–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ederveen S, Gelauff G, Pelkmans J (2008) Assessing Subsidiarity. In: In Gelauff G, Grilo I, Lejour A (eds) Subsidiarity and Economic Reform in Europe: 19–40, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  7. Ederveen S, Thissen L (2008) European Coordination of Higher Education. In Gelauff G, Grilo I, Lejour A (eds) Subsidiarity and Economic Reform in Europe: 113–128, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission (2006a) Putting Knowledge into Action: A broad-based innovation strategy for the EU, Communication from the Commission, COM (2006) 502 finalGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission (2006b) Impact Assessment, Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the European Institute of Technology, COM (2006) 604 finalGoogle Scholar
  10. Gérard M (2008) Higher Education, Mobility and the Subsidiarity Principle. In: Gelauff G, Grilo I, Lejour A (eds) Subsidiarity and Economic Reform in Europe: 97–112, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  11. Hölzl W (2006) Cohesion and Excellence: Two ways to a better Europe. TIP Study, Vienna: WIFO-Austrian Institute of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  12. Holtz-Eakin D (2000) Public Policy toward entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 15: 283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keller W (2004) International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature 42: 752–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaul I, Grundberg I, Stern M (1999) Global public goods-international cooperation in the 21st century, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Middlefart-Knarvik KH, Overman HG (2002) Delocation and European integration: is structural spending justified? Economic Policy 17: 321–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oates WE (1972) Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt, Brace, JovanovicGoogle Scholar
  17. Oates WE (1999) An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37: 1120–1149Google Scholar
  18. Pelkmans J (2006) Testing for Subsidiarity. BEEP Briefing no 13, February 2006Google Scholar
  19. Scotchmer S (2005) Innovation and Incentives, Cambridge MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Von Tunzelman N, Nassehi S (2004) Technology policy, European Union enlargement, and economic, social and political sustainability. Science and Public Policy 31: 475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van der Horst A, Lejour A, Straathof B (2008) Why European Innovation Policy? In: Gelauff G, Grilo I, Lejour A (eds) Subsidiarity and Economic Reform in Europe: 143–156, SpringerGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahel Falk
    • 1
  • Werner Hölzl
    • 1
  • Hannes Leo
    • 1
  1. 1.WIFO Austrian Institute of Economic ResearchViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations