Advertisement

The London Congestion Charging Scheme: The Evidence

  • John Peirson
  • Roger Vickerman
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

In February 2003, the Mayor of London introduced road pricing for driving in a small area of Central London. The London Congestion Charging Scheme uses relatively simple technology, was implemented over two and a half years, faced political opposition and required the efforts of a determined political champion who refused to be put off. The £5 charge has reduced car movements by about 30%, and increased bus use and traffic speeds. The unexpectedly large reduction in car use is partly explained by the possibility of taking routes around the charging zone. For this reason, the implied elasticity of about −0.8 is greater than many other previous elasticity estimates. It is suggested that extending the Scheme to a larger area or applying a similar scheme to certain other cities may not be quite so successful.

Keywords

Price Elasticity Road User Ring Road Road Price Congestion Charge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Automobile Association (2000). Congestion Charging in London — The Views of the AA. London.Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan, C. (1963). Traffic in Towns: A study of the long term problems of traffic in urban areas. Reports of the Steering and Working Groups to the Minister of Transport. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  3. Committee for Integrated Transport (2002). Public Attitudes to Transport in England. London.Google Scholar
  4. De Borger B., Proost, S. (eds.) (2001). Reforming Transport Pricing in the European Union. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  5. Department of Transport (1994). Travel in London, London Area Transport Survey. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  6. Department for Transport (2000). Ten Year Plan for Transport. The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
  7. Dix, M. (2002), The Central London Congestion Charging Scheme — From Conception to Implementation. Paper delivered at Conference on Implementing Reform on Transport Pricing Identifying Mode-specific Issues, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. ECMT (2004). Managing Transport Demand Through User Charges: Experience to Date. OECD/ECMT Conference, London.Google Scholar
  9. Goodwin, P. (1992). A Review of New Demand Elasticities with Special Reference to Short and Long Run Effects of Price Changes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 26: 155–169.Google Scholar
  10. Government Office for London (1995). The London Congestion Charging Research Programme. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  11. Government Office for London (2000). Road Charging Options for London. (ROCOL), London.Google Scholar
  12. House of Commons Committee on Transport (2003). Urban Charging Schemes: First Report. HC390-I, Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
  13. Livingstone, K. (1998). It Pays to Invest in Public Transport. Newspaper Plc 22 July 1998.Google Scholar
  14. Livingstone, K. (2000). Mayoral Manifesto.Google Scholar
  15. London Assembly (2004). Congestion Charging: A First Review. Greater London Authority, London.Google Scholar
  16. Observer, The (2004). Many cities look to emulate London congestion fee, 15 February 2004, London.Google Scholar
  17. Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (2004). RICS Research into the Impact of Congestion Charging on London Property.Google Scholar
  18. Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (2005). RICS Research into the Impact of Congestion Charging on London Property. http://www.rics.org/NR/rdonlyres/BE42797B-BC58-4AAE-8737-813278CDB601/0/congestioncharging.pdfGoogle Scholar
  19. Santos, G., Shaffer, B. (2004). Preliminary Result of the London Congestion Charging Scheme. Public Works, Management and Policy, 9: 164–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smeed, R J. (1964). Road Pricing: Economics and Technical Possibilities. Ministry of Transport, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  21. Transport for London (2001). Transport Strategy. London.Google Scholar
  22. Transport for London (2003a). Impacts Monitoring First Annual Report. London.Google Scholar
  23. Transport for London (2003b). Congestion Charging: Three Months On. London.Google Scholar
  24. Transport for London (2003c). Congestion Charging 6 Months On. London.Google Scholar
  25. Transport for London (2003d). http://www.londontransport.co.uk/tfl/cc-ex/Google Scholar
  26. Transport for London (2004). Update on Scheme Impacts. London.Google Scholar
  27. Transport Initiatives Edinburgh Ltd/the City of Edinburgh Council (2004). The Integrated Transport Initiative for Edinburgh and South East Scotland Proposed Congestion Charging Scheme: Statement of Case. City of Edinburgh Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Peirson
    • 1
  • Roger Vickerman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations