To Be or Not to Be (Served)
- 1.7k Downloads
A common modeling assumption in the realm of cost sharing is that players persuade each other to jointly submit false bids if none of the members of such a coalition loses utility and at least one gains. In order to counteract this kind of manipulation, the service provider could employ group-strategyproof (GSP) mechanisms that elicit truthful bids. The basically only general technique for the design of GSP mechanisms is due to Moulin. Unfortunately, it has limitations with regard to budget-balance (BB) and economic efficiency (EFF).
In this work, we introduce a slight modification of GSP that we call CGSP, allowing us to achieve vastly better results concerning BB and EFF. In particular, we give new CGSP mechanisms that we call “egalitarian” due to being inspired by Dutta and Ray’s (1989) “egalitarian solution”. We achieve 1-BB for arbitrary costs and additionally 2H n -EFF for the very natural and large class of subadditive costs. Egalitarian mechanisms are also acyclic mechanisms, as introduced by Mehta et al. (2007). Thus far, acyclic was known only to imply weak GSP, yet we show that it is already sufficient for the strictly stronger CGSP.
Finally, we present a framework and applications on how to cope with computational complexity.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bleischwitz, Y., Monien, B., Schoppmann, F., Tiemann, K.: The power of two prices: Beyond cross-monotonicity. In: Kučera, L., Kučera, A. (eds.) MFCS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4708, pp. 657–668. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Brenner, J., Schäfer, G.: Cost sharing methods for makespan and completion time scheduling. In: Proc. of the 24th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. LNCS, vol. 4393, pp. 670–681 (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Bruckner, P.: Scheduling Algorithms. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
- 11.Gupta, A., Könemann, J., Leonardi, S., Ravi, R., Schäfer, G.: An efficient cost-sharing mechanism for the prize-collecting Steiner forest problem. In: Proc. of the 18th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Immorlica, N., Mahdian, M., Mirrokni, V.: Limitations of cross-monotonic cost sharing schemes. In: Proc. of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 602–611 (2005)Google Scholar
- 14.Mehta, A., Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: Beyond Moulin mechanisms. In: Proc. of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 1–10 (2007)Google Scholar
- 18.Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: New trade-offs in cost-sharing mechanisms. In: Proc. of the 38th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 79–88 (2006)Google Scholar
- 19.Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: Optimal efficiency guarantees for network design mechanisms. In: Proc. of the 12th Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 469–483 (2007)Google Scholar