WINE 2007: Internet and Network Economics pp 108-118 | Cite as
Competitive Safety Strategies in Position Auctions
Abstract
We attempt to address the challenge of suggesting a useful bidding strategy to an agent in the an ad auction setting. We explore the possibility of using competitive safety strategies in that context; a C-competitive strategy guarantees a payoff which is no less than 1/C of the payoff obtained in a best Nash equilibrium. We adopt the model of ad auctions suggested by Varian and provide analysis of competitive safety strategies in that context. We first show that no useful safety competitive strategies exist in a setting with complete information about the agents’ valuations. Namely, in a setting with N bidders and exponential click-rate functions the ratio can be arbitrarily close to N. We also show that N is a general upper bound for any click-rates and valuations, while \(\sum_{t=1}^N \frac{1}{t}\) is a tight bound for linear click-rates. However, in our main results we show that, surprisingly, useful C-competitive strategies do exist in the incomplete information setting. More specifically, we show that under the assumption that agents’ valuations are uniformly distributed, an e-competitive strategy exists for the case of exponential click-rate functions, and a 2-competitive safety strategy exists for linear click-rate functions.
Keywords
Nash Equilibrium Multiagent System Congestion Game Symmetric Nash Equilibrium Complete Information GamePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Altman, A., Boden-Bercovici, A., Tennenholtz, M.: Learning in one-shot strategic form games. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4212, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Asdemir, K.: Bidding Patterns in Search Engine Auctions. Working Paper, University of Alberta School of Business (2005), Available at: http://www.business.ualberta.ca/kasdemir/biddingWARS.PDF
- Aumann, R.J.: On the Non-Transferable Utility Value: A Comment on the Roth-Shaper Examples. Econometrica 53(3), 667–677 (1985)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Borgs, C., Chayes, J., Etesami, O., Immorlica, N., Jain, K., Mahdian, M.: Bid Optimization in Online Advertisement Auctions. manuscript (2005)Google Scholar
- Carmel, D., Markovitch, S.: Exploration strategies for model-based learning in multiagent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 2(2), 141–172 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krishna, V., Perry, M.: Efficient Mechanism Design. Technical report, Pennsylvania State University (1998), Available at: http://econ.la.psu.edu/~vkrishna/papers/vcg20.pdf
- Powers, R., Shoham, Y.: New criteria and a new algorithm for learning in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of NIPS 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R.W.: A Class of Games Possessing Pure-Strategy Nash Equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory 2, 65–67 (1973)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Tennenholtz, M.: Competitive Safety Analysis: Robust Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 17, 363–378 (2002)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Varian, H.R.: Position auctions. Technical Report, UC Berkeley (2006), Available at: http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/2006/