Identification of FRBR Works Within Bibliographic Databases: An Experiment with UNIMARC and Duplicate Detection Techniques
Many experiments and studies have been conducted on the application of FRBR as an implementation model for bibliographic databases, in order to improve the services of resource discovery and transmit better perception of the information spaces represented in catalogues. One of these applications is the attempt to identify the FRBR work instances shared by several bibliographic records. In our work we evaluate the applicability to this problem of techniques based on string similarity, used in duplicate detection procedures mainly by the database research community. We describe the particularities of the application of these techniques to bibliographic data, and empirically compare the results obtained with these techniques to those obtained by current techniques, which are based on exact matching. Experiments performed on the Portuguese national union catalogue show a significant improvement over currently used approaches.
KeywordsFunctional Requirements for Bibliographic Records FRBR Bibliographic databases string similarity duplicate detection
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. München: K.G. Saur, UBCIM publications, new series, vol. 19 (1998), www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf ISBN 3-598-11382-X
- 7.Hickey, T.B., O’Neill, E.T., Toves, J.: Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). D-Lib Magazine 8, 9 (2002), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september02/hickey/09hickey.html
- 8.California Digital Library.: The Melvyl Recommender Project. Full Text Extension. Supplementary Report (2006), http://www.cdlib.org/inside/projects/melvyl_recommender/report_docs/mellon_extension.pdf
- 9.Cohen, W.W., Ravikumar, P., Fienberg, S.E.: A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (2003), http://www.isi.edu/info-agents/workshops/ijcai03/papers/Cohen-p.pdf
- 10.Jaro, M.A.: Advances in record linking methodology as applied to the 1985 census of Tampa Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Society 64, 1183–1210 (1989)Google Scholar
- 11.Kaiser, M., Lieder, H.J., Majcen, K., Vallant, H.: New Ways of Sharing and Using Authority Information. D-Lib Magazine 9, 11 (2003), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november03/lieder/11lieder.html
- 12.Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L., Bollacker, K.D.: Autonomous Citation Matching. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents, ACM press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
- 13.Pasula, H., Marthi, B., Milch, B., Russell, S., Shpitser, I.: Identity Uncertainty and Citation Matching. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing (2002), http://people.csail.mit.edu/milch/papers/nipsnewer.pdf
- 14.Lee, D., On, B.W., Kang, J., Park, S.: Effective and Scalable Solutions for Mixed and Split Citation Problems in Digital Libraries. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Information quality in information systems, pp. 69–76 (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Aalberg, T.: A process and tool for the conversion of MARC records to a normalized FRBR implementation. Digital Libraries: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities. In: 9th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, pp. 283–292 (2006)Google Scholar