Integrated Authoring, Annotation, Retrieval, Adaptation, Personalization, and Delivery for Multimedia

  • Horst Eidenberger
  • Susanne Boll
  • Stavros Christodoulakis
  • Doris Divotkey
  • Klaus Leopold
  • Alessandro Martin
  • Andrea Perego
  • Ansgar Scherp
  • Chrisa Tsinaraki
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4877)

Abstract

In this paper we present CoCoMA, an integrated platform, developed in the framework of the DELOS II European Network of Excellence on Digital Libraries, aiming at the unification of the most important aspects of multimedia management and multimedia presentation. The paramount goal of CoCoMA is to maximize the added value from task and data integration by the identification and exploitation of connection points and inherent workflow similarities. The paper provides a brief description of the involved research fields, suggests an architecture for integrated multimedia consumption and presentation, and discusses the most prominent connection points. Problems and solutions are discussed jointly, and illustrated by the components of the application prototype developed for the DELOS project.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Manjunath, B.S., Salembier, P., Sikora, T. (eds.): Introduction to MPEG-7: Multimedia Content Description Interface. Wiley, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eidenberger, H., Boll, S., Christodoulakis, S., Divotkey, D., Leopold, K., Martin, A., Perego, A., Scherp, A., Tsinaraki, C.: Towards integrated authoring, annotation, retrieval, adaptation, personalization and delivery of multimedia content. In: DELOS 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Del Bimbo, A.: Visual Information Retrieval. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fuhr, N.: Information retrieval methods for multimedia objects. In: Veltkamp, R.C., Burkhardt, H., Kriegel, H.P. (eds.) State-of-the-Art in Content-based Image and Video Retrieval, pp. 191–212. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graves, A., Lalmas, M.: Video retrieval using an MPEG-7 based inference network. In: SIGIR 2002, pp. 339–346 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tseng, B.L., Lin, C.Y., Smith, J.: Using MPEG-7 and MPEG-21 for personalizing videos. IEEE Multimedia 11(1), 42–52 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, Q., Balke, W.T., Kießling, W., Huhn, A.: P-News: Deeply personalized news dissemination for MPEG-7 based digital libraries. In: Heery, R., Lyon, L. (eds.) ECDL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3232, pp. 256–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsinaraki, C., Polydoros, P., Kazasis, F., Christodoulakis, S.: Ontology-based semantic indexing for MPEG-7 and TV-Anytime audiovisual content. Multimedia Tools and Application Journal 26, 299–325 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsinaraki, C., Polydoros, P., Christodoulakis, S.: Interoperability support for ontology-based video retrieval applications. In: Enser, P.G.B., Kompatsiaris, Y., O’Connor, N.E., Smeaton, A.F., Smeulders, A.W.M. (eds.) CIVR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3115, pp. 582–591. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsinaraki, C., Polydoros, P., Christodoulakis, S.: Interoperability support between MPEG-7/21 and OWL in DS-MIRF. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19(2), 219–232 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsinaraki, C., Christodoulakis, S.: A user preference model and a query language that allow semantic retrieval and filtering of multimedia content. In: SMAP 2006 Workshop, pp. 121–128 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bertino, E., Ferrari, E., Perego, A., Santi, D.: A constraint-based approach for the authoring of multi-topic multimedia presentations. In: ICME 2005, pp. 578–581 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schojer, P., Böszörményi, L., Hellwagner, H.: QBIX-G – A transcoding multimedia proxy. In: MMCN 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Devillers, S., Timmerer, C., Heuer, J., Hellwagner, H.: Bitstream syntax description-based adaptation in streaming and constrained environments. IEEE Trans. on Multimedia 7(3), 463–470 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vetro, A., Timmerer, C.: Digital item adaptation: Overview of standardization and research activities. IEEE Trans. on Multimedia 7(3), 418–426 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mukherjee, D., Delfosse, E., Kim, J.G., Wang, Y.: Optimal adaptation decision-taking for terminal and network quality-of-service. IEEE Trans. on Multimedia 7(3), 454–462 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Böszörményi, L., Hellwagner, H., Kosch, H., Libsie, M., Podlipnig, S.: Metadata driven adaptation in the ADMITS project. EURASIP Signal Processing and Image Communication Journal 18, 749–766 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Steiger, O., Sanjuan, D.M., Ebrahimi, T.: MPEG-based personalized content delivery. In: IEEE ICIP 2003, pp. 14–16. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geurts, J., van Ossenbruggen, J., Hardman, L.: Application-specific constraints for multimedia presentation generation. In: MMM 2001, pp. 339–346 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bes, F., Jourdan, M., Khantache, F.: A generic architecture for automated construction of multimedia presentations. In: MMM 2001, pp. 229–246 (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lemlouma, T., Layaïda, N.: Context-aware adaptation for mobile devices. In: IEEE MDM 2004, pp. 106–111. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scherp, A., Boll, S.: MM4U: A framework for creating personalized multimedia content. In: Srinivasan, U., Nepal, S. (eds.) Managing Multimedia Semantics, pp. 246–287. IRM Press (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scherp, A., Boll, S.: Paving the last mile for multi-channel multimedia presentation generation. In: MMM 2005, pp. 190–197 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leopold, K., Jannach, D., Hellwagner, H.: A knowledge and component based multimedia adaptation framework. In: IEEE MSE 2004, pp. 10–17. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jannach, D., Leopold, K., Timmerer, C., Hellwagner, H.: A knowledge-based framework for multimedia adaptation. Applied Intelligence 24(2) (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jannach, D., Leopold, K.: Knowledge-based multimedia adaptation for ubiquitous multimedia consumption. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 30(3), 958–982 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eidenberger, H., Breiteneder, C.: VizIR – A framework for visual information retrieval. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 14(5), 443–469 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eidenberger, H., Divotkey, R.: A data management layer for visual information retrieval. In: ACM MDM Workshop, ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mitrovic, D., Zeppelzauer, M., Eidenberger, H.: Analysis of the data quality of audio descriptors of environmental sounds. In: WMS 2006, pp. 70–79 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Divotkey, D., Eidenberger, H., Divotkey, R.: Artificial intelligence and query execution methods in the VizIR framework. Journal of the Austrian Artificial Intelligence Society 24(2), 17–27 (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salembier, P.: MPEG-7 multimedia description schemes. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11(6), 748–759 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Polydoros, P., Tsinaraki, C., Christodoulakis, S.: GraphOnto: OWL-based ontology management and multimedia annotation in the DS-MIRF framework. In: WMS 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tsinaraki, C., Perego, A., Polydoros, P., Syntzanaki, A., Martin, A., Christodoulakis, S.: Semantic, constraint & preference based multimedia presentation authoring. Journal of Digital Information Management 4(4), 207–213 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Horst Eidenberger
    • 1
  • Susanne Boll
    • 2
  • Stavros Christodoulakis
    • 3
  • Doris Divotkey
    • 1
  • Klaus Leopold
    • 4
  • Alessandro Martin
    • 5
  • Andrea Perego
    • 6
  • Ansgar Scherp
    • 7
  • Chrisa Tsinaraki
    • 3
  1. 1.Vienna University of TechnologyAustria
  2. 2.University of OldenburgGermany
  3. 3.Technical University of Crete 
  4. 4.University of KlagenfurtAustria
  5. 5.University of MilanItaly
  6. 6.University of Insubria at VareseItaly
  7. 7.OFFIS Institute for Information TechnologyGermany

Personalised recommendations