Modelling Intellectual Processes: The FRBR - CRM Harmonization

  • Martin Doerr
  • Patrick LeBoeuf
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4877)

Abstract

Even though the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set is well accepted as a general solution, it fails to describe more complex information assets and their cross-correlation. These include data from political history, history of arts and sciences, archaeology or observational data from natural history or geosciences. Therefore IFLA and ICOM are merging their core ontologies, an important step towards semantic interoperability of metadata schemata across all archives, libraries and museums. It opens new prospects for advanced global information integration services. The first draft of the combined model was published in June 2006.

Keywords

Digital Library Bibliographic Information Semantic Interoperability Bibliographic Record Core Ontology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Patel, M., Koch, T., Doerr, M., Tsinaraki, C., Gioldasis, N., Golub, K., Tudhope, D.: Semantic Interoperability in Digital Library Systems. DELOS Network of Excellence on Digital Libraries - deliverable 5.3.1 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doerr, M.: The CIDOC CRM - An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine 4(1) (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    LeBoeuf, P. (ed.): Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (Frbr): Hype or Cure-All? Haworth Press, Inc. (January 2005) ISBN:0789027984 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doerr, M., Hunter, J., Lagoze, C.: Towards a Core Ontology for Information Integration. Journal of Digital information 4(1) (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinclair, P., Addis, M., Choi, F., Doerr, M., Lewis, P., Martinez, K.: The use of CRM Core in Multimedia Annotation. In: SWAMM 2006. Proceedings of First International Workshop on Semantic Web Annotations for Multimedia, part of the 15th World Wide Web Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, May 22-26, 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Definition of the CIDOC CRM: http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    IFLA Study Group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records: Functional requirements for bibliographic records. Final report. Volume 19 of UBCIM Publications. New Series. K. G. Saur,Munich (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Boeuf, P., Lahanier, C., Aitken, G., Sinclair, P., Lewis, P., Martinez, K.: Integrating Museum & Bibliographic Information: The SCULPTEUR Project. In: Proc. ICHIM 2005 Conference, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Successive drafts of the model and minutes of the Harmonisation Group’s meetings are available from both the CIDOC CRM Web site at http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/frbr_inro.html and the FRBR Review Group’s Web site at http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/wgfrbr/FRBR-CRMdialogue_wg.htm

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Doerr
    • 1
  • Patrick LeBoeuf
    • 2
  1. 1.ICS-FORTH 
  2. 2.Bibliotheque National deFrance

Personalised recommendations