Integrability and Nijenhuis Tensors

  • V.S. Gerdjikov
  • G. Vilasi
  • A.B. Yanovski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 748)

Keywords

Poisson Bracket Symplectic Form Symplectic Manifold Poisson Structure Symplectic Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. D. Lax. Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 21:467–490, 1968.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. E. Zakharov and L. D. Faddeev. Korteweg-de Vries equation: A completely integrable Hamiltonian system. Funct. Anal. Appl., 5(4):280–287, 1971.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. De Filippo, G. Marmo, M. Salerno, and G. Vilasi. On the Phase Manifold Geometry of Integrable Nonlinear Field Theory. Preprint IFUSA, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. De Filippo, G. Marmo, M. Salerno, and G. Vilasi. A new characterization of complete integrable systems. Nuovo Cimento B, 83:97–112, 1984.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. J. Kaup. Closure of the squared Zakharov–Shabat eigenstates. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 54(3):849–864, 1976.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. J. Olver. Evolution equations possessing infinitely many symmetries. J. Math. Phys., 18:1212, 1977.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magri, F.: A geometrical approach to the nonlinear solvable equations. In: Boiti, M., Pempinelli, F., Soliani, G. (eds.) Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Dynamical Systems: Proceedings of the Meeting Held at the University of Lecce June 20–23, 1979. Lect. Notes Phys. 120, 233–263 (1980)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Vilasi. On the hamiltonian structures of the Korteweg-de Vries and sine-Gordon theories. Phys. Lett. B, 94(2):195–198, 1980.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. De Filippo, G. Marmo, and G. Vilasi. A geometrical setting for the Lax representation. Phys. Lett. B, 117(6):418–422, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. De Filippo, M. Salerno, and G. Vilasi. A geometrical approach to the integrability of soliton equations. Lett. Math. Phys., 9:85–91, 1985.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Hopf. The partial differential equation u t + uu x = u xx. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 3:201–230, 1950.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. D. Cole. On a quasi-linear parabolic equation occurring in aerodynamics. Q. Appl. Math., 9(3):225–236, 1951.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. F. Ames. Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations in Engineering. Academic Press, New York-London edition, 1965.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Vilasi. Phase manifold geometry of burgers hierarchy. Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 37(3):105–109, 1985.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. De Filippo, G. Marmo, M. Salerno, and G. Vilasi. Phase manifold geometry of burgers hierarchy. Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 37(3):105–109, 1983.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. S. Mishchenko and A. T. Fomenko. Generalized Liouville method of integration of Hamiltonian systems. Funct. Anal. Appl., 12(2):113–121, 1978.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. R. Adams and T. Ratiu. The three-point vortex problem: Commutative and noncommutative integrability. Contemp. Math., 81:245–257, 1988.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. V. Trofimov and A. T. Fomenko. Algebra and Geometry of the Integrable Hamiltonian Differential Equations. Factorial, Minsk, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. T. Fomenko. Symplectic Geometry. Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics. Gordon & Breach Publishers, Luxembourg, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Fassò and T. Ratiu. Compatibility of symplectic structures adapted to noncommutatively integrable systems. J. Geom. Phys., 27:199–220, 1998.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O. I. Bogoyavlenskij. Extended integrability and Bi-Hamiltonian systems. Commun. Math. Phys., 196(1):19–51, 1998.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O. I. Bogoyavlenskij. Theory of tensor invariants of integrable Hamiltonian systems. I. Incompatible Poisson structures. Commun. Math. Phys., 180(3):529–586, 1996.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O. I. Bogoyavlenskij. Theory of tensor invariants of integrable Hamiltonian systems. II. Theorem on symmetries and its applications. Commun. Math. Phys., 184(2):301–365, 1997.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Cordani. The Kepler Problem:Group Theoretical Aspects, Regularization and Quantization, with Applications to the Study of Perturbations. Birkhauser Verlag, Boston, MA, 2003.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Marmo and G. Vilasi. When do recursion operators generate new conservation laws? Phys. Lett. B, 277(1–2):137–140, 1992.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    F. Magri and C. Morosi. A geometrical characterization of integrable Hamiltonian systems through the theory of Poisson–Nijenhuis manifolds. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Milano, 1984.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Magnano and F. Magri. Poisson–Nijenhuis structures and Sato hierarchy. Rev. Math. Phys., 3(4):403–466, 1991.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach and F. Magri. Lax–Nijenhuis operators for integrable systems. J. Math. Phys., 37:6173–6197, 1996.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach. The Lie bialgebroid of a Poisson–Nijenhuis manifold. Lett. Math. Phys., 38(4):421–428, 1996.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    V. G. Drinfeld and V. V. Sokolov. Lie Algebras and Korteweg-de Vries Type Equations. VINITI Series: Contemporary problems of mathematics. Recent developments. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vsesoyuz. Inst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Inform., Moscow, 1985.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    L. D. Faddeev and L. A. Takhtajan. Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Solitons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.MATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Magri, C. Morosi, and O. Ragnisco. Reduction techniques for infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems: Some ideas and applications. Commun. Math. Phys., 99(1):115–140, 1985.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Magri, F., Falqui, G., Pedroni. M.: The method of Poisson pairs in the theory of nonlinear PDEs. Direct and Inverse Methods in Nonlinear Evolution Equations. Lect. Notes Phys. 632, 85–136. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2003)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    I. M. Gel’fand and I. Y. Dorfman. Hamiltonian operators and algebraic structures related to them. Funct. Anal. Appl., 13(4):248–262, 1979.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    I. M. Gel’fand and I. Y. Dorfman. The schouten bracket and hamiltonian operators. Funct. Anal. Appl., 14(3):223–226, 1980.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. Godbillion. Géométrie différentielle et méchanique analytique. Hermann, Paris, 1969.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    B. Florko and A. B. Yanovski. On Magri’s theorem for complete integrability. Communication JINR (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research), Dubna, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • V.S. Gerdjikov
    • 1
  • G. Vilasi
    • 2
  • A.B. Yanovski
    • 3
  1. 1.Bulgarian Academy of SciencesInst. Nuclear Research & Nuclear EnergyGermany
  2. 2.Dipto. Fisica Ist. Nazionale di Fisica NucleareUniversità SalernoItaly
  3. 3.Dept. Mathematics & Applied MathematicsUniversity of Cape Town7701 South Africa

Personalised recommendations