Model Checking Almost All Paths Can Be Less Expensive Than Checking All Paths
We compare the complexities of the following two model checking problems: checking whether a linear-time formula is satisfied by all paths (which we call universal model checking) and checking whether a formula is satisfied by almost all paths (which we call fair model checking here). For many interesting classes of linear-time formulas, both problems have the same complexity: for instance, they are PSPACE-complete for LTL.
In this paper, we show that fair model checking can have lower complexity than universal model checking, viz., we prove that fair model checking for L(F ∞ ) can be done in time linear in the size of the formula and of the system, while it is known that universal model checking for L(F ∞ ) is co-NP-complete. L(F ∞ ) denotes the class of LTL formulas in which F ∞ is the only temporal operator. We also present other new results on the complexity of fair and universal model checking. In particular, we prove that fair model checking for RLTL is co-NP-complete.
KeywordsModel Check Linear Time Temporal Logic Universal Model Linear Temporal Logic
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Lichtenstein, O., Pnueli, A.: Checking that finite state concurrent programs satisfy their linear specification. In: POPL, pp. 97–107. ACM Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
- 7.Schmalz, M.: Extensions of an algorithm for generalised fair model checking. Diploma Thesis, Technical Report B 07-01, University of Lübeck, Germany (2007), http://www.tcs.uni-luebeck.de/Forschung/B0701.pdf
- 8.Schmalz, M., Völzer, H., Varacca, D.: Model checking almost all paths can be less expensive than checking all paths. Technical Report 573, ETH Zürich, Switzerland (2007), http://www.inf.ethz.ch/research/disstechreps/techreports
- 9.Schnoebelen, P.: The complexity of temporal logic model checking. In: AiML, pp. 393–436. King’s College Publications (2002)Google Scholar
- 12.Varacca, D., Völzer, H.: Temporal logics and model checking for fairly correct systems. In: LICS, pp. 389–398. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Vardi, M.Y.: Automatic verification of probabilistic concurrent finite-state programs. In: FOCS, pp. 327–338. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1985)Google Scholar
- 14.Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: An automata-theoretic approach to automatic program verification. In: LICS, pp. 332–344. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1986)Google Scholar