Source Salience and the Persuasiveness of Peer Recommendations: The Mediating Role of Social Trust

  • Peter de Vries
  • Ad Pruyn
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4744)


A lack of trust and face-to-face interaction prevents many people from purchasing online. Relevant research aimed at overcoming such problems is often based on the assumption that providing social information increases trust. These studies, however, have yielded inconsistent results, arguably because trust is usually treated as a unidimensional concept. This study targets the influence of social information on trust by taking account of the multidimensional nature of trust. Peer recommendations in product judgment tasks were hypothesized to affect consumers’ product attitudes via social trust, rather than competence, if peer images are available and uncertainty associated with products is high. Results indeed support mediation by social trust, but only for experience products.


E-commerce peer recommendations social trust social presence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ahuja, M., Gupta, B., Raman, P.: An empirical investigation of online consumer purchasing behaviour. Communications of the ACM 46, 145–151 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McKnight, D.H., Chervany, N.L.: What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 35–59 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luhmann, N.: Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. John Wiley Sons, Chichester (1979)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis, D., Weigert, A.: Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 63, 967–985 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McAllister, D.J.: Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38, 24–59 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson, D., Grayson, K.: Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research 58, 500–507 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20, 709–734 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamagishi, T., Yamagishi, M.: Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion 18, 130–166 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega 32, 407–424 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G.T., Gutscher, H.: Shared values, social trust, and the perception of geographic cancer clusters. Risk Analysis 21, 1047–1053 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corritore, C.L., Kracher, B., Wiedenbeck, S.: Online trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 737–758 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Riegelsberger, J.: Trust in Mediated Interactions. Doctoral thesis, University of London, United Kingdom (2005) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walker, J., Sproull, L., Subramani, R.: Using a human face in an interface. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 85–99 (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tourangeau, R., Couper, M.P., Steiger, D.M.: Humanizing self-administered surveys: Experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys. Computers in Human Behavior 19, 1–24 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rocco, E.: Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact. In: CHI 1998 Proceedings, pp. 496–502 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., Wright, Z.: Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In: CHI 2002 Proceedings, vol. 4, pp. 135–140 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen, S., Chaiken, S.: The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In: Chaiken, S., Trope, Y. (eds.) Dual-process theories in social psychology, pp. 73–96. The Guilford Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley, London (1976)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Biocca, F., Harms, C., Burgoon, J.K.: Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence 12, 456–480 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Latané, B.: The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36, 343–356 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spears, R., Lea, M.: Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 21, 427–459 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M.: Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 25, 689–715 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walther, J.B.: Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: a relational perspective. Communication Research 19, 52–90 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nelson, P.: Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy 82, 729–754 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klein, L.R.: Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: Search versus experience goods. Journal of Business Research 41, 195–203 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Darby, M.R., Karni, E.: Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics 16, 67–86 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Giddens, A.: The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1990)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McKimmie, B.M., Chalmers, K.: Academic Facial Attributes Catalogue [internet database]. School of Psychology, University of Queensland (2002),
  29. 29.
    Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dennett, D.C.: The intentional stance. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA (1987)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56, 81–103 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Girard, T., Korgaonkar, P., Silverblatt, R.: Relationship of type of product, shopping orientations, and demographics with preference for shopping on the internet. Journal of Business and Psychology 18, 101–120 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter de Vries
    • 1
  • Ad Pruyn
    • 1
  1. 1.Twente University, Marketing Communication and Consumer Psychology, 7500 AE EnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations